Texas AG Paxton Refers Leach for Criminal Investigation over Judicial Interference

1,366 Views | 12 Replies | Last: 12 days ago by eric76
TheWoodlandsTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Attorney General Ken Paxton has initiated a criminal referral, accusing State Rep. Leach of a "serious breach of ethical rules and violation of the law".

This action follows revelations that Leach sent text messages to Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Michelle Slaughter in an attempt to sway her opinion. Leach later acknowledged the messages, explaining he was "passionate" about the case of Robert Roberson, who faced execution earlier this month for the murder of his two-year-old daughter. The execution was delayed due to legal interventions by Leach and other state lawmakers.

"Jeff Leach sought to alter the outcome of capital punishment proceedings by criminally attempting to influence a judge on the Court of Criminal Appeals," said Paxton citing Texas Penal Code 36.04, which prohibits "improper influence." This law makes it a crime to "privately address a representation, entreaty, argument, or other communication to any public servant who exercises or will exercise official discretion in an adjudicatory proceeding with an intent to influence the outcome of the proceeding on the basis of considerations other than those authorized by law."

To this end, Paxton is preparing a criminal referral for the case. Additionally, citing Leach's role as chairman of the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence, Paxton has called for his resignation.

After issuing a subpoena to Roberson, Leach purported to represent the Texas House of Representatives in the legal proceedings surrounding the efforta move that has been challenged already for violating state law.

Now, Leach has another hurdle as a newly released letter reveals Leach purportedly attempted to text a judge on the Court of Criminal Appeals in a bid to sway their opinion:

Leach: Judge I've wracked my brain about whether I should send you this message…about where 1 even can send you this message legally and ethically.
Being that I am not a party to active litigation in front of the CCA nor an attorney representing any active party, and being that I've made comments publicly, I simply am compelled to send you this message.
One Judge. That's all that is needed to simply say… there are too many questions and too many holes and too much uncertainty… and Robert Roberson deserves a new trial. Judge Alcala communicated to the Committee that the CCA can sua sponte do so. And that's my hope and prayer.
Only sending this message to you. And you alone. As my friend and as a wonderful Judge who I have so much faith in, I hope you'll consider doing so."

The judge responded saying it was an "ex parte" communication, meaning communication about a case without the knowledge or consent of all parties involved. Such communication is not only prohibited by disciplinary rules but state law as well.

https://texasscorecard.com/state/ag-paxton-refers-rep-leach-for-criminal-investigation-over-alleged-judicial-interference/

https://texasscorecard.com/state/jeff-leachs-alleged-texts-to-judge-on-death-row-case-sparks-legal-concerns/

Leach sent the illegal texts to 1 of the 3 RINOs (Judge Slaughter) who lost their seats to grassroots conservatives on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in the 2024 Primaries (Schenck, Parker, and Finley all won the primaries and are heavy favorites in the general. Schenck is poised to become the new Presiding Judge aka Chief Justice in 2025). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is our state's highest criminal court. Every judge on the court is Republican.

"legally": Leach is basically admitting to breaking the law in his text message.

Can't believe Abbott endorsed this RINO. All of the RINOs Abbott endorsed against lost. Abbott only endorsed Leach because Leach voted for school choice. Hopefully Abbott will endorse against Leach next time, if Leach decides to run again. The crime in Leach's text message is punishable by up to one year in jail. 24 RINOs lost their jobs in the 2024 Texas Primaries, but RINOs still remain in the Texas House. The Texas Senate is RINO free.
Bob Knights Paper Hands
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry not sorry. These dbags fell for another innocence project bull****ting and then chose to break the law.
txwxman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need more folks like Paxton in office. Only criminals can read the criminal mind
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Typical Woodlands OP

Post a story of alleged wrongdoing, and then spend the rest of the day using it to bash some politician over the head that had absolutely nothing to do with it. Or try to use it to make some completely unrelated political "point"

Typical
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those judges didn't lose their seats to "grassroots" anything. They lost them to Paxton-supported challengers who utilized Paxton-aligned SuperPAC money because they wouldn't let him run roughshod over the Texas Constitution when he tried to illegally take over criminal voting fraud cases.

(I'm all for the AG being able to do that, but you have to actually pass laws letting him do it first.)

I don't think people realize how Bidenesque Paxton is. He is cutthroat in going after his political enemies. There's a reason he has so many.
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clearly broke the law. The arrogance of this POS to think he is above the law and is able to attempt to criminally sway a judge's decision. **** this guy.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hungry Ojos said:

Clearly broke the law. The arrogance of this POS to think he is above the law and is able to attempt to criminally sway a judge's decision. **** this guy.


Yeah, this is pretty bad. And he did issue a statement acknowledging that he screwed up pretty badly.

I cannot imagine what was going through this guy's head
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I assume the judge felt obligated to notify the parties of the communication which is how it got out into the public. Good for her in doing the right thing.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This reminds me of the scene in Charlie Wilson's War

When one of congressman Wilson's prominent contributors/constituents came to his office and asked him to intervene in a case that was before a federal judge. Wilson said he could not do that. The constituent asked why not?

Wilson replied, because it's against a sh** load of really good laws, that's why.
Gigem_94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A bit ironic that Leach and Paxton are both members of the same church…at least they used to be.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem_94 said:

A bit ironic that Leach and Paxton are both members of the same church…at least they used to be.


Awwwwwkward!!
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Texas Supreme Court has ruled that Roberson's execution may continue.

From https://abcnews.go.com/US/robert-robersons-execution-resume-texas-supreme-court-declares/story?id=115901572

Quote:

The execution of Robert Roberson -- whose "shaken baby syndrome" murder conviction in the death of his 2-year-old daughter has come under scrutiny -- can resume, according to a Texas Supreme Court decision Friday.

Never mind that the "shaken baby syndrome" was reportedly by the defense. The medical examiner could not rule out that he may have shaken her, but that the cause of death was from blunt force trauma.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From https://www.tpr.org/news/2024-11-15/robert-robersons-execution-cant-be-stopped-by-texas-house-subpoena-supreme-court-rules

Quote:

A Texas House of Representatives committee did not have the authority to override death row inmate Robert Roberson's scheduled execution with a subpoena, the Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday.

Roberson was scheduled for execution last month over the death of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki in 2002. Prosecutors argued Roberson violently shook Nikki, but the scientific validity of shaken baby syndrome has been called into question since then.

The House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence issued its subpoena one day before, requiring Roberson to testify about the use of the state's "junk science" law in his capital murder case. It allows people to appeal their convictions if they believe they would not have been convicted if certain scientific information was available at trial.

Upon the request of the committee in a lawsuit filed Oct. 17, the day Roberson was scheduled to die, a Travis County district judge issued a temporary restraining order preventing the execution. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice successfully appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals the state's court of last resort for criminal cases which cleared the way for Roberson's execution.

But the Texas House committee took their request to the state's highest civil court to pause Roberson's execution and testify before lawmakers. The Texas Supreme Court temporarily paused the execution and allowed him to testify.

However, in Friday's order, the court ruled that while the Texas House committee rightfully raised a question of civil law, it overstepped and infringed on the other branches of government by attempting to delay the execution.
ef857002-e9da-4375-b80a-869a3518bb00@8shield.net
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.