The ABC Debate was a biased disaster that wont change any minds

5,340 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by HumpitPuryear
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody's mind will be changed. ABC should never host a Presidential debate again.
K2Ag97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do have a lower opinion of ABC now
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It doesn't help that Trump talked about eating cats. This is not the time for getting **** wrong. It's not hard to at least fact check your news a little bit. He's on the national stage, not frolicking and ****posting on Texags F16.
kongaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CNN is less biased at this point. The entire ABC post-debate is talking about Kakala's presidential presence
mlb87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houston Lee said:

Nobody's mind will be changed. ABC should never host a Presidential debate again.


But we Repubs are Charlie Brown. In 4 years, we'll agree to it again.
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She played the role of feel good lawyer perfectly. Obama 2.0 and we all know how bad that **** head was.

Trump did not stick to policy or turn any of her statements right back on her.

I fear for our country.

Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HalifaxAg said:

She played the role of feel good lawyer perfectly. Obama 2.0 and we all know how bad that **** head was.

Trump did not stick to policy or turn any of her statements right back on her.

I fear for our country.


How could he stick to policy when the "moderators" kept moving on to more pressing issues.
Fightin2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. Trump: what is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?

VP Harris: what is your favorite color?
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
K2Ag97 said:

I do have a lower opinion of ABC now


I don't. It was already rock bottom. That David guy is going to enjoy his male orgy big time tonight for his performance.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course no one's mind was changed. Did you really believe a Harris voter was suddenly going to vote for Trump should she do poorly or vice versa?

This was about wrangling in that tiny number of undecided voters and rallying those unmotivated voters who would vote for Trump or Harris if they were somehow convinced to get their asses into a voting booth come Election Day. From the sounds of it Trump didn't do that. Harris... maybe? Time will tell. We will see in the next few days what the polling numbers say about who won and who lost or if it was a draw.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry your candidate is insane
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
K2Ag97 said:

I do have a lower opinion of ABC now
Really how is that possible? You should have hated them more. I cant have a lower opinion of ABC, NBC, CNN, CBS, Yahoo, etc, etc. They have been nothing but propaganda outlets for 3 decades and only now some of yall are seeing this ????
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PanzerAggie06 said:

Of course no one's mind was changed. Did you really believe a Harris voter was suddenly going to vote for Trump should she do poorly or vice versa?

This was about wrangling in that tiny number of undecided voters FOR HARRIS and rallying those unmotivated voters who would vote for Trump or Harris if they were somehow convinced to get their asses into a voting booth come Election Day. From the sounds of it Trump didn't do that. Harris... maybe? Time will tell. We will see in the next few days what the polling numbers say about who won and who lost or if it was a draw.
FIFY
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

HalifaxAg said:

She played the role of feel good lawyer perfectly. Obama 2.0 and we all know how bad that **** head was.

Trump did not stick to policy or turn any of her statements right back on her.

I fear for our country.


How could he stick to policy when the "moderators" kept moving on to more pressing issues.


I don't disagree but there were several chances where he could have turned her statements right back on her with examples of her failures.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

Sorry your candidate is insane
What's your favorite policy of Kamala's? Please link her official stance and why you will vote for it.
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

Sorry your candidate is insane
And yours is a radical left commie. Fortunately she is also a mindless empty suit. So that helps a little.
rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The title of this thread is just an acknowledgement that Trunp lost tonight.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I actually thought Muir was more professional. This really surprised me.
JDay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you believe the moderators were neutral?
rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDay said:

Do you believe the moderators were neutral?


Of course they were. We all knew they would be.
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is wishful thinking. The last debate resulted in the sitting president dropping out of the race.

Trump didn't perform Biden bad but Kamala will see a poll bump this week.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDay said:

Do you believe the moderators were neutral?
Its ABC, Trump and his team should have known better
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

PanzerAggie06 said:

Of course no one's mind was changed. Did you really believe a Harris voter was suddenly going to vote for Trump should she do poorly or vice versa?

This was about wrangling in that tiny number of undecided voters FOR HARRIS and rallying those unmotivated voters who would vote for Trump or Harris if they were somehow convinced to get their asses into a voting booth come Election Day. From the sounds of it Trump didn't do that. Harris... maybe? Time will tell. We will see in the next few days what the polling numbers say about who won and who lost or if it was a draw.
FIFY
Hate to break it to you but undecided voters actually exist. I know two of them.

How they are trying to decide between Harris and Trump is beyond my ability to comprehend but they somehow are. I doubt this is a large number of people but in an election this close they could make all the difference in the world.
The D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrazosDog02 said:

It doesn't help that Trump talked about eating cats. This is not the time for getting **** wrong. It's not hard to at least fact check your news a little bit. He's on the national stage, not frolicking and ****posting on Texags F16.


There was a cat eaten. It was on a cops camera. There is a video
one safe place
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just like Trump left too many obama people in place when he became president, he should never agree to a "debate" on any of the mainstream media that favors his opponent. Mind boggling.
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDUB08AG said:

I actually thought Muir was more professional. This really surprised me.
Professional Democrat Politician?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Conclusion:

We are about 2 months from a presidential election and the American people still know nothing about Harris' positions. Shouldn't she want to tell people about what she wants to do and why?

Donald Trump is still Donald Trump. Very little we don't know about him. And if you don't know something then just ask him.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

Sorry your candidate is insane


Oh sure. Open borders, price controls, DEI, EQUITY, taxpayer healthcare for illegals, etc etc is not insane.

What a stupid ****ing take
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PanzerAggie06 said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

PanzerAggie06 said:

Of course no one's mind was changed. Did you really believe a Harris voter was suddenly going to vote for Trump should she do poorly or vice versa?

This was about wrangling in that tiny number of undecided voters FOR HARRIS and rallying those unmotivated voters who would vote for Trump or Harris if they were somehow convinced to get their asses into a voting booth come Election Day. From the sounds of it Trump didn't do that. Harris... maybe? Time will tell. We will see in the next few days what the polling numbers say about who won and who lost or if it was a draw.
FIFY
Hate to break it to you but undecided voters actually exist. I know two of them.

How they are trying to decide between Harris and Trump is beyond my ability to comprehend but they somehow are. I doubt this is a large number of people but in an election this close they could make all the difference in the world.
And you missed the point of my FIFY. This wasn't set up to give undecided voters a chance to pick a candidate. It was set up on tee for Kamala. Trump failed miserably in this debate. But it wouldn't have mattered.

"Donald, you said these despicable things that have debunked. Why are you awful?"

Trump defends himself taking the bait.

"Kamala, isn't what Trump said just awful?"

If people were undecided coming into this, they are morons. If they made up their mind after this debate without being able to see how slanted the debate was, then we deserve the depression we are about to get.
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?

kongaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrazosDog02 said:

It doesn't help that Trump talked about eating cats. This is not the time for getting **** wrong. It's not hard to at least fact check your news a little bit. He's on the national stage, not frolicking and ****posting on Texags F16.


"Getting **** wrong." Who exactly is fact checking this? The city officials who let 20k Haitians in their town?
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The D said:

BrazosDog02 said:

It doesn't help that Trump talked about eating cats. This is not the time for getting **** wrong. It's not hard to at least fact check your news a little bit. He's on the national stage, not frolicking and ****posting on Texags F16.


There was a cat eaten. It was on a cops camera. There is a video


And apparently that video was from Canton (not Springfield) and was a US citizen that was nuts.

At best, the cat thing is hearsay. And given the downside of it being 100% made up, why take the chance of saying "immigrants eat cats" on camera?
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

Gordo14 said:

Sorry your candidate is insane
What's your favorite policy of Kamala's? Please link her official stance and why you will vote for it.
Gordo?
"H-A: In return for the flattery, can you reduce the size of your signature? It's the only part of your posts that don't add value. In its' place, just put "I'm an investing savant, and make no apologies for it", as oldarmy1 would do."
- I Bleed Maroon (distracted easily by signatures)
BrazosDog02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kongaggie said:

BrazosDog02 said:

It doesn't help that Trump talked about eating cats. This is not the time for getting **** wrong. It's not hard to at least fact check your news a little bit. He's on the national stage, not frolicking and ****posting on Texags F16.


"Getting **** wrong." Who exactly is fact checking this? The city officials who let 20k Haitians in their town?


Dude could have gone with animal sacrifice that was at least backed with credible coverage. But he went with eating cats and now looks like a doofus that can't bother to at least check his facts. This now goes from a legit argument to being spun as a racist Haitian hating d-bag.

It's just sloppy , that's all.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of rehearsed lines, but terrible positions and track record for the Marxist. Smoke will clear and she is still selling bull*****

Americans have suffered for four years because of this and that's how they'll vote.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.