🚨 How much of the $143,000+ Julie and John Kelly have given to politicians have been to Democrats?

Prior to Nov 2016, Julie Kelly seemed content doing propaganda for the Big Ag businesses under the guise of a regular "suburban mom" who teaches cooking classes. She lives in a… pic.twitter.com/tAd2AGF9OK

— Kyle Seraphin (@KyleSeraphin) August 26, 2024

Quote:

---

This is curious because on 3/29/2016, Julie contributed $2700 to Hillary for America - the
@HillaryClinton campaign for president against @realDonaldTrump. This was in line with her and her husband's pattern of giving money to @TheDemocrats including Harry Reid, @BarackObama
both senate and presidential campaigns, and more. She actually supported @AdamKinzinger
for Congress with $500 in 2012 in an amusing turn of events.

But people change, and Julie is entitled to change. However, it becomes harder to explain the fact that she supported and donated $2800 to @JoeBidenon 12/17/2019. At the time she was writing for American Greatness (https://amgreatness.com/author/julie-kelly/…) and likely writing her book trashing the #NeverTrump part of the @GOP. Her book "Disloyal Opposition," published in July 2020, has an amusingly ironic title. As people supported "the Great Julie Kelly" on podcasts, TV, and now her subscriber funded @X and @SubstackInc accounts, #MAGA readers were funding a household that has donated over $130,000 to all of the Democrats they dislike intensely.

Since Trump first took office, and Julie was writing for conservative publications, she and John donated to@BetoORourke,@SenatorDurbin,@timkaine in VA, @TammyMurphyNJ @KamalaHarris (via Harris Victory Fund - previously Biden Victory Fund), @jontester, @SenBobCasey, and the @DNC.

All of this information was obtained using publicly available information on the internet from my home. You don't need special access or databases. The donations can be seen on the government's FEC contributions database. The search parameters were chosen using OSINT that took about 30 minutes to generate. I spent more time writing this post than looking this up.

The point is - stop being so trusting of people's motives when they are going to attack
@SuspendablesUSA for simply sharing accurate information. Julie was wrong about the language in the FD-888 used to execute the Mar-a-Lago search warrant.
@dbongino decided to back Julie's false information and publicly attacked a number of men who have more skin in the game and future's on the line than either the Bonginos or the Kellys.

If you blindly follow this woman who has attacked @shipwreckedcrew, @TPC4USA , and others without justification or cause, you are supporting Democrats. Financially.
(Journalists who wish to received the FEC search parameters can request via DM. The answer to the headline question is over 90% by my calculation.)

---

I reached out to @SeanMDav to see what the @FDRLST take was. He decided I was an op...

even though he was paying @julie_kelly2 while she was donating to @JoeBiden. She has articles from 2016 til 2024. (https://t.co/5VJrf2ADli)

But... She gave $2800 to Joe in Dec 2019. Weird. pic.twitter.com/uC3ZEaIcCg

— Kyle Seraphin (@KyleSeraphin) August 26, 2024

Julie is funny. She wants to give me credit for a piece I didn't write. My friend @TPC4USA asked for my opinion on video which comes from 1000's of hours of surveillance in DC. I gave it.

I stand by giving my OPINION to a reporter writing a story.

Meanwhile, it is a fact that… https://t.co/HfqTj70akL pic.twitter.com/jfdinZLVWh

— Kyle Seraphin (@KyleSeraphin) August 26, 2024

Oh... Julie... why did you support @SAKimFoxx in 2015?! Those soft on crime, let criminals out on no bail, and eventually blind eye to George Floyd riots really seemed troubling to conservatives.

$2000 should have gotten you a thank you note, right? https://t.co/A8RDcthUQt pic.twitter.com/HgObqpf6lD

— Kyle Seraphin (@KyleSeraphin) August 27, 2024

Quote:

---

Outrageous lies by Joe Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and DOJ/Jack Smith about "independence" from investigations into Trump.

The Biden White House and DOJ wew intimately involved in developing a criminal case against Trump for records mismanagement--it appears the… pic.twitter.com/UhHPtRkVlR

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) April 22, 2024

But sure, none of these case have been coordinated with the WH. Here's a question though.

Doesn't appear to me that any of those earlier redactions have anything to do with documents with classified markings, sources or methods or national security info, so why was it redacted in the first place?

---

Quote:

---

---

Quote:

---

Julie Kelly wrote an article about the trial after the conviction in May of this year. For the lawyers here, suggest you read the whole thing. For you IANAL types, I'll excerpt some of the irregularities that the judge allowed in the trial.

Quote:

---

Quote:
Jury deliberations began April 26; the nearly four-month trial was marred by controversy, including last-minute disclosures of numerous FBI informants; open hostility between the judge and defense attorneys; the accidental discovery of explosive messages between FBI agents discussing deleted evidence, a doctored report, and the surveillance of attorney-client jailhouse communications; multiple sightings in evidence of the still-uncharged Ray Epps; a convoluted appellate ruling on the legitimacy of a key charge in the case; and suspicions of a jury stalker.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:
Most of the government's evidence consisted of inflammatory text messages posted in group chats, which included the presence of an unknown number of FBI informants. No defendant was accused of bringing weapons to the Capitol or assaulting a police officer. Tarrio, the group's leader, was in a Baltimore hotel on January 6, having left Washington under court order following his arrest on January 4, 2021 for an unrelated incident.

One defense attorney described the Justice Department's case as "fairy dust." Nicholas Smith, who represents Nordean, told the jury last week during closing arguments that the case was held together by "paper clips and rubber bands." Two former Proud Boys were witnesses for the government; two defendants, Rehl and Pezzola, testified on their own behalf.

---

Quote:

---

Quote:
Judge Kelly, a former federal prosecutor and Trump appointee, acted as an extra lawyer for the prosecution, routinely rubber-stamping government motions that make the convictions ripe for appeal.

He repeatedly denied the defendants' release from jailBiggs, Rehl, Nordean, and Pezzola have been in custody under pretrial detention orders since early 2021while refusing to move the trial out of D.C. as the Justice Department racked up convictions in record time against January 6 defendants.


At least one court observer noted the jury's troubling political bias. "Six jurors had participated in liberal-leaning protests or marches, while none mentioned conservative-leaning demonstrations," Lawfare writer Roger Parloff reported after the jury was selected. "The protests included, in two cases, 'women's marches'; in two cases, 'anti-gun' marches; and, in four cases, protests related to Black Lives Matter or George Floyd's murder, which, as we'll see, are of particular concern in this case. One sitting juror had a Black Lives Matter sign in her yard."

Public meetings held by the January 6 select committee coincided with jury selection in the case, but Kelly was unpersuaded that the committee's work would influence a highly-partisan jury pool in Washington even as committee members singled out the Proud Boys during nighttime televised hearings.

Kelly forced defense attorneys to "pre-clear" cross-examination questions related to the use of FBI informants with prosecutors, a move defense counsel decried as inimical to the adversarial nature of a criminal trial. He rejected a defense subpoena for Epps and refused to compel the testimony of a key FBI informant tied to Tarrio.

---

LINK

---

lead said:

---

What's going on and why should I care?

---

- Julie Kelly did some great work on behalf of J6ers.

- Julie Kelly has donated thousands up upon thousands of dollars to Democrats persecuting J6ers.

Both of those statements are true at the same time which is why people deserve answers.

— John Cardillo (@johncardillo) August 27, 2024

I owe you nothing.

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 28, 2024

No.

— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) August 29, 2024