The steal is on: Federal agencies and EO 14019

4,656 Views | 35 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by SpreadsheetAg
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Executive Order 14019 was signed by President Joe Biden in March 2021, during his first 100 days in office. The order empowers federal agencies to engage in Get Out the Vote measures for federal, state, and local elections, including in federal prisons. It is telling that you cannot access the executive order on White House dot gov. However, the United States Employment Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has fully overviewed and outlined the purpose behind this EO and the implementation plan.
Quote:

Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting, states the Administration's policy to promote and defend the right to vote for all Americans who are legally entitled to participate in elections. The Executive Order also asserts the Federal Government's responsibility to expand access to, and education about, voter registration and election information, and to combat misinformation, to enable all eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.

Describing the right to vote as "fundamental" and as "the foundation of American democracy," the Executive Order notes the challenges encountered by many Americans who seek to exercise that right, including people of color, individuals with limited English proficiency, people with disabilities, members of the military serving overseas, and other American citizens living abroad. The Executive Order identifies several legal authorities that protect and promote the right to vote, including the U.S. Constitution, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
Quote:

Republican state attorneys general are pushing back through lawfare.
Quote:

On Tuesday, attorneys general from nine states Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and South Dakota filed a federal lawsuit asking a U.S. district court in Wichita, Kansas, to shut down an executive order that is using federal agencies to register and mobilize left-leaning voters, with the assistance of White House-approved leftist organizations. Among the charges, the complaint alleges the Biden administration has usurped the appropriating power of Congress, which did not grant the executive branch authority to fund the unprecedented GOTV initiative.

"We're not going to stand by and let the federal government get turned into a giant voter turnout machine for Democrats. We're going to make sure you follow the law," Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen told me in an interview this week. "You've got an executive branch that is far exceeding the authority that has been given to them. This is something that's never been done before at the federal level."

Quote:

That's because, as the AGs argue in the federal lawsuit, the executive branch cannot "take money Congress allocated and reuse it for improper purposes." And they certainly cannot do so without following the laws that establish procedures laid out by Congress. Biden and crew also can't encroach on the state's sovereign rights over the administration of elections, including registering voters.
Quote:

Known action by the Biden-Harris administration, combined with secrecy, "creates an impression" that the federal government has its "thumb on the scales" for the Nov. 5 presidential election, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach says.

Kobach, a Republican, is leading a multistate lawsuit to strike down President Joe Biden's 2021 executive order on elections.

"It appears it could be designed to register more Democrats than Republicans," Kobach said of Biden's order in a phone interview Wednesday with The Daily Signal.

The Kansas attorney general referred to a March letter, cited in footnotes in the lawsuit, from Senate Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin of Illinois and other Senate Democrats to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland about voter registration through the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

"Durbin's letter is applauding registration in prisons, and prisoners have disproportionately been Democrats," Kobach told The Daily Signal.
LINK

We are so screwed.
Canyon Lake Agbu94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:



We are so screwed.
And not in a good way.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Canyon Lake Agbu94 said:

aggiehawg said:



We are so screwed.
And not in a good way.
Not even a reach around.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At this point I'm fine with getting rid of Executive Orders.

A president's job is to "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Not to create laws or change appropriations. The fact that Congress would have to have a supermajority vote in order to invalidate an executive order (because the President could veto the law invalidating his own executive order) just mocks the intent of Art. 2 Section 3.

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why in the world would Republicans wait until 3 months before the election if the EO was passed in 2021?

As always, Republicans play tiddly winks with Democrats are playing 3-D chess.
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe prior pursuits were dismissed by a Dem friendly judge on standing and the plaintiffs asked the Supremes to consider the standing issue but they refused.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
81-days until we hit with that razzle-dazzle.

Gonna be a wild ride.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

Why in the world would Republicans wait until 3 months before the election if the EO was passed in 2021?

As always, Republicans play tiddly winks with Democrats are playing 3-D chess.
They tried earlier but judge dismissed their claims. Once again, the Catch-22 inelection laws. But recent SCOTUS decisions getting rid of Chevron and reining in other federal agencies brought the issue back up again for these state AGs to sue again.
AgNav93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I predict Kamala hits 90M votes this election.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgNav93 said:

I predict Kamala hits 90M votes this election.
In MI, PA and WI the total number of votes will be in excess of 100% of eligible voters, not just registered voters, eligible voters. There's a difference. And ERIC targets them.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sims said:

At this point I'm fine with getting rid of Executive Orders.

A president's job is to "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed." Not to create laws or change appropriations. The fact that Congress would have to have a supermajority vote in order to invalidate an executive order (because the President could veto the law invalidating his own executive order) just mocks the intent of Art. 2 Section 3.


If you abuse a power, you should lose it. Auto-route all EOs through the Supreme Court for a constitutionality check before enactment.
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great news!! Yee-haw! Now some of you Georgia baws file open records requests on Runbeck. They handled Fulton County MIBs.
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mericopa too?
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I heard it called "Mari-corruption County"
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I were President, I would issue an Executive Order banning all Executive Orders.

Seriously, EO's have gotten completely out-of-hand and I still don't understand why the judicial branch hasn't declared them unconstitutional.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Barnyard96 said:

Mericopa too?
No. Maricopa was not doing business in Georgia. But Runbeck was a contractor for Fulton County Board of Elections.

Let's also add Gabe Sterling's consulting company that was contractor for 2020.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Meanwhile in Georgia ...
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Meanwhile in Georgia ...
Probably true but so far the private entities have been successful in GA to deny open records requests. Now they will have to explain why they no longer have their own records.
FDT 1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgNav93 said:

I predict Kamala hits 90M votes this election.

I've been saying the same thing for months, but my number has been 100M. Every swing state will pause counting again and it will take weeks for a final count. Heck, the FBI has already come out and said there will be "delays."
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tramp96 said:

If I were President, I would issue an Executive Order banning all Executive Orders.

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Meanwhile in Georgia ...
Probably true but so far the private entities have been successful in GA to deny open records requests. Now they will have to explain why they no longer have their own records.
Leaky pipes. Records got wet, molded and were destroyed as a biohazard.

/probably
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's why all those reports a few months ago about excess voter registrations were coming up. All the states were clueless and now the reporting mechanism had been shut down. So yeah...welcome to a full blown communist takeover.
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

It's why all those reports a few months ago about excess voter registrations were coming up. All the states were clueless and now the reporting mechanism had been shut down. So yeah...welcome to a full blown communist takeover.
At this point, ERIC, CTCL, CEIR and multiple SuperPacs aligned with Dems are in RICO territory,if not in violation of election laws.

Not that anything will happen of course.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Ag87H2O said:

Why in the world would Republicans wait until 3 months before the election if the EO was passed in 2021?

As always, Republicans play tiddly winks with Democrats are playing 3-D chess.
They tried earlier but judge dismissed their claims. Once again, the Catch-22 inelection laws. But recent SCOTUS decisions getting rid of Chevron and reining in other federal agencies brought the issue back up again for these state AGs to sue again.


It was dismissed, by a Trump appointed judge, because they lacked standing under the Electors and Elections clauses.

Nothing in the administrative law cases like the Chevron one have anything to do with the standing issue.

The answer is politics. They're filing this lawsuit now for political points leading into elections and to further their narrative.
aggiepanic95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
coming to Georgia soon





APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like has been stated before, Harris is going to "win", by hook or by crook".

A power hungry party that has done everything to circumvent laws, cheat, steal, and lie to win.

And it has been very successful with the help of our education system and MSM, which has betrayed the essence of freedom for tyranny.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder how many democrats are hot bolting water flanges in Atlanta, Phoenix, Detroit, Philly,etc?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Executive Order 14019 was signed by President Joe Biden in March 2021, during his first 100 days in office. The order empowers federal agencies to engage in Get Out the Vote measures for federal, state, and local elections, including in federal prisons. It is telling that you cannot access the executive order on White House dot gov. However, the United States Employment Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has fully overviewed and outlined the purpose behind this EO and the implementation plan.
Quote:

Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting, states the Administration's policy to promote and defend the right to vote for all Americans who are legally entitled to participate in elections. The Executive Order also asserts the Federal Government's responsibility to expand access to, and education about, voter registration and election information, and to combat misinformation, to enable all eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.

Describing the right to vote as "fundamental" and as "the foundation of American democracy," the Executive Order notes the challenges encountered by many Americans who seek to exercise that right, including people of color, individuals with limited English proficiency, people with disabilities, members of the military serving overseas, and other American citizens living abroad. The Executive Order identifies several legal authorities that protect and promote the right to vote, including the U.S. Constitution, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
Quote:

Republican state attorneys general are pushing back through lawfare.
Quote:

On Tuesday, attorneys general from nine states Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and South Dakota filed a federal lawsuit asking a U.S. district court in Wichita, Kansas, to shut down an executive order that is using federal agencies to register and mobilize left-leaning voters, with the assistance of White House-approved leftist organizations. Among the charges, the complaint alleges the Biden administration has usurped the appropriating power of Congress, which did not grant the executive branch authority to fund the unprecedented GOTV initiative.

"We're not going to stand by and let the federal government get turned into a giant voter turnout machine for Democrats. We're going to make sure you follow the law," Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen told me in an interview this week. "You've got an executive branch that is far exceeding the authority that has been given to them. This is something that's never been done before at the federal level."

Quote:

That's because, as the AGs argue in the federal lawsuit, the executive branch cannot "take money Congress allocated and reuse it for improper purposes." And they certainly cannot do so without following the laws that establish procedures laid out by Congress. Biden and crew also can't encroach on the state's sovereign rights over the administration of elections, including registering voters.
Quote:

Known action by the Biden-Harris administration, combined with secrecy, "creates an impression" that the federal government has its "thumb on the scales" for the Nov. 5 presidential election, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach says.

Kobach, a Republican, is leading a multistate lawsuit to strike down President Joe Biden's 2021 executive order on elections.

"It appears it could be designed to register more Democrats than Republicans," Kobach said of Biden's order in a phone interview Wednesday with The Daily Signal.

The Kansas attorney general referred to a March letter, cited in footnotes in the lawsuit, from Senate Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin of Illinois and other Senate Democrats to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland about voter registration through the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

"Durbin's letter is applauding registration in prisons, and prisoners have disproportionately been Democrats," Kobach told The Daily Signal.
LINK

We are so screwed.
The most truthful thing they'll say.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

Why in the world would Republicans wait until 3 months before the election if the EO was passed in 2021?

As always, Republicans play tiddly winks with Democrats are playing 3-D chess. Actively subverting the spirit of the constitution and the separation of powers
FIFY

It time to put the executive branch back into its original constitutionally mandated place. Some big states need to step up, like they did on the border when they forced Bidens hand on immigration. That was the way to fight this.

Big blocks of states need to tell the feds to FO when they push beyond their boundaries.

Never vote democrat ever not even for dog catcher.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man, reading this thread pisses me off. But it was that 2020 broke what little trust I had in a once great system.

It wasn't our system that failed. It was rotten and corrupt people that failed us. I hope I live to see the day they are held accountable by the rule of law. Well, once we get that back.

How do we get that back ?
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its not coming back, welcome to the democrat dictatorship. We will start to see larger and larger margins of victory.
JamesPShelley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

Why in the world would Republicans wait until 3 months before the election if the EO was passed in 2021?

As always, Republicans play tiddly winks with Democrats are playing 3-D chess checkers.
FIFY

Libs couldn't play Twister without instructions authored in 'dummy'.

Chess? lol
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ttu_85 said:

Man, reading this thread pisses me off. But it was that 2020 broke what little trust I had in a once great system.

It wasn't our system that failed. It was rotten and corrupt people that failed us. I hope I live to see the day they are held accountable by the rule of law. Well, once we get that back.

How do we get that back ?
By doing what the NY State Government did to Trump.

They selected which law they needed, then choose to extend the Statute of Limitations on every single person involved.

Every single time a Dem needs an expired SOL extended, they either get the judge to comply, or the state assembly willingly either extends the SOL, or just writes a new law for the time they need.

The Dems did it with Michael Flynn and Trump, for sure. I'm certain there are other times.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.