HAHAHAHAHAHA


Genius

Well, that's one way to hit your diversity quota in advertising!

That's allsome!!

So much truth in advertising in that video.

Humor isn't dead after all.

Boreing says "what you run Hollywood now?" and I can't decipher what Shapiro says

and I have listened to it 3 times.

anyone know what his reply is?

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

LMCane said:

---

Boreing says "what you run Hollywood now?" and I can't decipher what Shapiro says

and I have listened to it 3 times.

anyone know what his reply is?

---

I heard something like "a little too on the nose"

"Too on the nose?"

never knew that the same Jeremy Boreing from Daily Wire was the razor guy

which came first?

and that commercial is AWESOME

homebuildingag said:

---

"Too on the nose?"

---

OMG

so many double entendres by Shapiro yet again!

texagbeliever said:

---

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

---

I see your point

but compared to most real commercials, was it really that over the top?

LMCane said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

---

I see your point

but compared to most real commercials, was it really that over the top?

---

Not over the top but I don't think the Daily Wire should be framing what they can/can't put in a commercial based on relativity to an industry standard. I would think as a principled organization it should be based on their principles. Again I realize this is nitpicky but I like to be picky sometimes.

Put another way, do I think Ben Shapiro would be cool if that was his wife (assuming she was just as attractive as those actresses) be dressed like that in a shoot. No. That is my issue. Don't let double standards creep in because they love to grow.

Yeah, too nitpicky. This is satirical humor. Lighten up Francis.

texagbeliever said:

---

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

---

Sorry darlin, but I dont think the commercial was meant for liberal white women. Except the very end.

The black dude is from the Babylon Bee's Californians Move to Texas skits.

texagbeliever said:

---

LMCane said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

---

I see your point

but compared to most real commercials, was it really that over the top?

---

Not over the top but I don't think the Daily Wire should be framing what they can/can't put in a commercial based on relativity to an industry standard. I would think as a principled organization it should be based on their principles. Again I realize this is nitpicky but I like to be picky sometimes.

---

What if their principles include "Not being gay!"?

Yeah, the sexualization in Jeremey's 2.0 commercial really puts this one to shame

most importantly- are the razors any good?

LMCane said:

---

never knew that the same Jeremy Boreing from Daily Wire was the razor guy

which came first?

and that commercial is AWESOME

---

Daily Wire came way before. He created Jeremy's Razors after Gillette released the Super Bowl commercial with the dad teaching his trans kid how to shave.

BigRobSA said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

LMCane said:

---

texagbeliever said:

---

honestly, a little nitpicky here, but I wish they wouldn't have sexualized the women as much. Seems like a cheap marketing ploy. I'm not saying don't have attractive women in it, but don't sexualize them to the degree they did. I get they made a joke about it, but to then have the base shot of the video be with the chick with the deep V seems contradictory. Flame away.

I do like the general message of the video. And glad to see the Babylon Bee guy who is really good in their skits branching out.

---

I see your point

but compared to most real commercials, was it really that over the top?

---

Not over the top but I don't think the Daily Wire should be framing what they can/can't put in a commercial based on relativity to an industry standard. I would think as a principled organization it should be based on their principles. Again I realize this is nitpicky but I like to be picky sometimes.

---

What if their principles include "Not being gay!"?

---

I didn't complain about the actresses being attractive. I just complained about their attire chosen. Not wanting scantily clad women on every video doesn't make one gay.

I just don't think selling "sex" with products like razors or beer or whatever is the right way to do it. For another thread but I think much of the issues of the sexual revolution likely stimmed from the cheaply selling of "sex" to move products.

LMCane said:

---

most importantly- are the razors any good?

---

They are meh, which is why they had to make a second one.

LMCane said:

---

most importantly- are the razors any good?

---

There's a QC test for that: Lend a new razor to your wife or GF for a day, and then shave your face and neck with it. If you look like Freddy Krueger afterwards, it's a crappy razor.

Hopefully they added a precision razor on the end. That was my biggest issue when I tried them

lol, Matt walsh is in the background of the selfie

LMCane said:

---

most importantly- are the razors any good?

---

I like the advertisement but still hard to beat the cheap disposable green schick razors from Walmart.

akm91 said:

---

Yeah, the sexualization in Jeremey's 2.0 commercial really puts this one to shame

---

C'mon now, where's Paris Hilton in the Carl's Jr commercial?

shack009 said:

---

LMCane said:

---

never knew that the same Jeremy Boreing from Daily Wire was the razor guy

which came first?

and that commercial is AWESOME

---

Daily Wire came way before. He created Jeremy's Razors after Gillette released the Super Bowl commercial with the dad teaching his trans kid how to shave.

---

He created Jeremy's Razors after Harry's pulled their Ads off of Daily Wire in some virtue signal power move. It was a direct response to Harry's, but I am sure Gillette going woke contributed as well.

a laughed a little too hard at the "black people of color" exchange

Jeremy sells razors but has a beard?

ord89 said:

---

shack009 said:

---

LMCane said:

---

never knew that the same Jeremy Boreing from Daily Wire was the razor guy

which came first?

and that commercial is AWESOME

---

Daily Wire came way before. He created Jeremy's Razors after Gillette released the Super Bowl commercial with the dad teaching his trans kid how to shave.

---

He created Jeremy's Razors after Harry's pulled their Ads off of Daily Wire in some virtue signal power move. It was a direct response to Harry's, but I am sure Gillette going woke contributed as well.

---

You're right. I think they were around the same time, maybe within a year of each other. Harry's pulled from DW because Michael Knowles wouldn't apologize for saying something along the lines of "men are men and can't be women."

cupcakesprinkles said:

---

Jeremy sells razors but has a beard?

---

Men who can't grow beards.

There are other parts of your neck and face you have to shave when you have a beard.

Totally forgot the Paris Hilton one since I don't really find her at all attractive.

Funny commercial.

End of the day these Jeremy's Razors are probably made in a Gillette factory & then repackaged to be a Jeremy's Razors. So Gillette is still making money (I know the DW beef was with Harrys not Gillette. However, Gillette still had that woke commercial that targeted "toxic male behavior").