Environmental knowledge is inversely associated with climate change anxiety

2,478 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by The Chicken Ranch
ShinerAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Environmental knowledge is inversely associated with climate change anxiety

This should explain things quite a bit...

Quote:

This study tests the hypotheses that overall environmental knowledge and climate-specific knowledge are inversely related to climate change anxiety, such that people who know more (less) about the environment in general, and about climate in particular, are less (more) anxious about climate change. Time lagged data were collected from N = 2,066 individuals in Germany. Results showed that, even after controlling for demographic characteristics, personality characteristics, and environmental attitudes, overall environmental knowledge and climate-specific knowledge were negatively related to climate change anxiety (both B = -.09, p < .001).
Quote:

The results of this study add to the growing body of evidence that higher domain-specific knowledge is associated with lower domain-associated anxiety. They also contribute to the emerging literature on the construct of climate change anxiety, which so far has focused on demographics, attitudes, and personality characteristics as predictors and neglected the role of environmental knowledge (Clayton 2020). In terms of practical implications, the main finding that environmental knowledge is negatively related to climate change anxiety suggests that efforts to improve environmental knowledge, for instance through educational and training interventions, may help reduce such anxiety. This seems important given demonstrated links between climate change anxiety and more general forms of mental ill-health, including generalized anxiety, depression, and distress (Schwartz et al. 2022; Searle and Gow 2010). These interventions could be targeted especially at younger people and people with higher environmental awareness and attitudes (e.g., climate scientists), who are at risk of experiencing higher climate change anxiety (Clayton 2020; Crandon et al. 2022; Verplanken et al. 2020).

However, consistent with previous research (Wullenkord et al. 2021), the average level of climate change anxiety in our sample was already quite low and, thus, it may not be possible to decrease it much further through interventions. It could also be questioned whether climate change anxiety has only (and always) negative consequences or, under certain circumstances, may even lead to positive outcomes. For example, recent research has suggested that engaging in collective action to address climate change can buffer the effect of climate change anxiety on depressive symptoms (Schwartz et al. 2022). Moreover, the measure used in our study is based on a definition of climate change anxiety as "a more clinically significant 'anxious' response" (Clayton and Karazsia 2020, p. 9). Future research should also focus on the potentially beneficial outcomes of more adaptive forms of climate change anxiety, such as practical anxiety (Pihkala 2020) or rational worrying (Verplanken and Roy 2013). Compared to clinical forms of climate change anxiety, these more adaptive forms may be constructively channeled into productive responses, such as increased information seeking and pro-environmental behavior (Verplanken et al. 2020).
________________________________________________________
“Those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.”
- George Bernard Shaw
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJ O'Rourke said "environmentalist will do anything they can to save the environment except learn about it"

Or something to that effect
ShinerAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As a corollary, they will spend any amount of money to fix it as long as it's not their own.
________________________________________________________
“Those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.”
- George Bernard Shaw
StrickAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well this certainly explains the debate in the other thread...
ShinerAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, it does. Without equivocation.
________________________________________________________
“Those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.”
- George Bernard Shaw
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only anxiety I have regarding climate change comes from the insane regulations and policies being implemented by the Marxists promoting it and using it as a political bludgeon.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most climate activists confuse "Weather" with "Climate". Enough said!
197361936
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Knowledge without understanding seems to be an issue.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pluralizes Everythings said:

Knowledge without understanding seems to be an issue.


Government does not analyze and adjust accordingly to anything that they do. Results be damned.
Bobaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Life on this planet is about 3.7 billion years old. I predict life will survive the summer of 23…
HWY6_RunsBothWays
How long do you want to ignore this user?
…so this is what's wrong with Greta Thunberg? She has anxiety? And here I was just thinking she was crazy.
Reno Hightower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Carbon = life
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sure this study says what many will think it does unless they read it.
Quote:

Hypothesis 1 was supported: people who possess more (less) overall environmental knowledge experience less (more) climate change anxiety.

Hypothesis 2 [was supported]: people who possess more (less) climate-specific knowledge experience less (more) climate change anxiety.
A climate zealot will obviously assume they know more about the climate than any rube on here and say because of that they have less anxiety and this study proves that. Now, that obviously flies in the face of what we see in reality since those nut jobs have lost their minds over it and the rest of us have way less anxeity, if any, over this issue.

So, at face value a non-zealot will see this and assume the study is going against the grain of the current climate doom and gloom messaging.

However, how are the authors defining environmental knowledge and climate-specific knowledge? For example, here is one of the questions asked:

Quote:

A 35-item multiple-choice environmental knowledge test, in which answers to the questions can be scored as "correct" or "incorrect," was collected from participants at T3 (Geiger et al. 2019). An example item is: "Which of the following phenomena has been the main cause of global warming over the last 20 years? (a) Reduction of the ozone layer (the so-called ozone hole), (b) Increased emissions of greenhouse gases (the so-called greenhouse effect), (c) Changes in ocean currents, (e.g., "el Niño"), (d) Changes in the skewness of earth's axis." Each participant's overall environmental knowledge score was represented as the number of correct answers out of 35.
The correct answer according to these researchers is (b) Increased emissions of greenhouse gases (the so-called greenhouse effect).

Thus, right away this research is debatable because the underlying answers to questions are assumed and have not been proven. IOW, there is zero room given here for natural causes to be a part of this answer.

So how do you interpret this study knowing that the Q&A used is debatable on some of these questions?

halfastros81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that item represents the overall survey then the whole thing is basically trash and doesn't mean a thing imo.

I dunno what the blue star means on my post but it was accidental.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only anxiety I get is wondering what the climate cultists are going to do to seize power and make my life hell.
BonfireNerd04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Climate activism is one of those things that sounds great in vague, abstract terms. Nobody (except maybe the Russians) actively wants the planet to get hotter.

But when you start asking "What would you personally sacrifice in order to prevent climate change?", it turns out that hardly anyone wants to give up modern conveniences like air conditioning and smartphones.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There have always been certain topics that a loud number people freak out about, but that most the populace doesn't really give an eff about.

For example, a July Gallup poll found that just 3% of Americans consider abortion to be the biggest issue. Only 4% moral/religious decline. 2% LGBT stuff. 2% the environment. The economy/inflation was at 19%, more than all those combined.

It's always about the economy.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BonfireNerd04 said:

Climate activism is one of those things that sounds great in vague, abstract terms. Nobody (except maybe the Russians) actively wants the planet to get hotter.

But when you start asking "What would you personally sacrifice in order to prevent climate change?", it turns out that hardly anyone wants to give up modern conveniences like air conditioning and smartphones.


This is soooo true. In my years covering oil and gas issues, I met ONE person who I legit think would do the whole off-grid/live in the stone age thing if we dropped fossil fuels. Most the others would cling to their comforts.

Obviously, I think cleaning up the industry and such is a good thing, but sometimes I just don't think people fully understand what they're advocating for.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BassCowboy33 said:

BonfireNerd04 said:

Climate activism is one of those things that sounds great in vague, abstract terms. Nobody (except maybe the Russians) actively wants the planet to get hotter.

But when you start asking "What would you personally sacrifice in order to prevent climate change?", it turns out that hardly anyone wants to give up modern conveniences like air conditioning and smartphones.


This is soooo true. In my years covering oil and gas issues, I met ONE person who I legit think would do the whole off-grid/live in the stone age thing if we dropped fossil fuels. Most the others would cling to their comforts.

Obviously, I think cleaning up the industry and such is a good thing, but sometimes I just don't think people fully understand what they're advocating for.


They're willing to pay more money for low emission technology. They purchase electric or hybrid cars, adopt vegan diets, etc.
fixer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
StrickAggie06 said:

Well this certainly explains the debate in the other thread...


But the all time highs!!!!
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The governor of Hawaii basically said climate change caused there disaster, the interviewer didn't call bull*****
The Chicken Ranch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's (D)ifferent.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.