Tucker Carlson producer about Trump election deniers: 'cousin ****ing terrorists'

4,489 Views | 42 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by fka ftc
Heloteslotus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tucker-carlson-fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-b2299830.html

Texts between Carlson's producer and Raj Shah, a former aide to Trump. Some highlights:

"Might wanna address this, but this stuff is so f****** insane. Vote rigging to the tune of millions? C'mon," he wrote.

Alex Pfeiffer, a producer working for Mr Carlson at the time but who has now left Fox, wrote back that "it is so insane but our viewers believe it so addressing again how her stupid Venezuela affidavit isn't proof might insult them".

Mr Shah later asked Mr Pfeiffer if he had seen that Newsmax host Greg Kelly "came after you?"

"Yeah," Mr Pfeiffer said. "This whole thing is surreal. Like negotiating with terrorists, but especially dumb ones. Cousin f****** types not saudi royalty."

Mr Raffel noted to Mr Shah that the White House public schedule was vague, simply saying that Mr Trump would be making "many calls and have many meetings" and "work from early in the morning until late in the evening".

"I think what they meant is The President will wake up early and commit many, many crimes including but not limited to obstruction of justice, attempted fraud, and treason in an effort to conduct a coup. Then he'll fly to a rally in furtherance of the same," Mr Raffel wrote.

"It's really disheartening," Mr Shah said. "The only clear cut evidence for voter fraud is the failed attempts from Trump."
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
not sure the grift that Greg Kelly has been running for two years but something going on there
Viper16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what crimes did President Trump commit rookie OP?
Lex Talionis.......Ordo Seclorum
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You think I really care what some producer at Fox News says?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you care what a liberal New York developer says?
bayareaag17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liberals vastly overestimate the influence of Fox News on the right. Nobody under the age of 50 watches it.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't feed the troll bot.
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bayareaag17 said:

Liberals vastly overestimate the influence of Fox News on the right. Nobody under the age of 50 65watches it.
FIFY
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Viper16 said:

So what crimes did President Trump commit rookie OP?
every democrat:

gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
carl spacklers hat said:

bayareaag17 said:

Liberals vastly overestimate the influence of Fox News on the right. Nobody under the age of 50 65watches it.
FIFY


What you're saying is nobody watches Fox News except old people who have higher voter turnout than any other age group and highest assets.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Okay, which res leftist got banned and had to come up with a new sock?
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Viper16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

Viper16 said:

So what crimes did President Trump commit rookie OP?
every democrat:


Classic Dumbocrat voter in this country! Millions of them!
Lex Talionis.......Ordo Seclorum
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lefty so angry at Tucker right now for destroying their J6 narrative that they're desperate to try and hurt his show and viewership in retaliation

And of COURSE in their little minds, if they can make it seem like he DARED to not be in 110% communion with God Emperor Trump then he must be excommunicated for Heresy!

When in fact the vast, vast majority of us DGAF because we care about results and policy, not if he's "likeable"
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this one of those threads again where a two year old conversation between two people was discovered in which they, like almost everyone else, didn't believe Sydney Powell had a kraken to release is used to conflate that it was the most fair and secure election ever?

We've already had a few of those threads. Lawsuit discovery found out Hannity and Carlson didn't believe there was a Kraken. Now some dude who worked for Carlson also didn't believe there was a kraken. Shocking news. Although I don't think Fox News entertained Sydney Powell more than about a day or two- two years ago and haven't talked about it since. This isn't some big gotcha like the useful idiot Twitter and Reddit mobs think it is.

Even without Sydney Powell's kraken with dominon voting machines, the Twitter Files + Zuckerberg himself on JRE have proven government and dnc collusion with tech platform monopolies to censor the press and commit the biggest election interference in US history. Plus, everyone knows states using scamdemic fear mongering to turn absentee voting into unsolicited mass mailed ballots and donor-funded collection efforts has changed the game from having to earn people's votes to having to collect people's ballots. This cannot in any way be considered the most fair and certainly not the most secure election ever in this banana republic that a cabal of elitists have created for themselves.
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

Do you care what a liberal New York developer says?


Assuming your TDS is showing and you're referring to Trump - when he's the leader of the free world, then he's I do care.

I also care what Brandon says because it is obvious that he and his ilk view us conservatives as evil.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rookies shouldn't be able to start threads.

Good Lord....who ****ing cares!?
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feels like a 2012heisman reboot account. Link, article summary, few / no comments to follow-up. Rinse, repeat.

Trash gonna trash. Needs to be taken out.
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Okay, which res leftist got banned and had to come up with a new sock?


Whoever it is, the sock name suggests a NW San Antonio location.
WHOOP!'91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP's assumption is that everyone that works at Fox is an R? Stupid premise, worse thread. It's bad, and OP should feel bad.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WHOOP!'91 said:

OP's assumption is that everyone that works at Fox is an R? Stupid premise, worse thread. It's bad, and OP should feel bad.
Also OP thinks we care
jjtrcka22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You don't have to affect millions of votes to change an election. You just need around 5 figures worth or less in about 5 counties. Not saying it for sure is happening, but I wouldn't doubt it does.
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jjtrcka22 said:

You don't have to affect millions of votes to change an election. You just need around 5 figures worth or less in about 5 counties. Not saying it for sure is happening, but I wouldn't doubt it does.
Yep, this is probably what happened. The Dems/Libs pulled out all the stops in about 5 or 6 areas in 5 or 6 critical states and flipped those states. The massive use of mail in ballots provided the tools they needed.

In to many states our elections are crap and need to be addressed and cleaned up or it will continue.
Heloteslotus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honest question to the people claiming "troll": how is posting a link to an article trolling? That's the standard MO for the majority of threads started here. The Dominion defamation lawsuit has brought out some pretty outlandish communications from Fox News and associates, several of which worked directly with or for Trump, but Fox obviously isn't covering it and neither are most other media outlets so I figured post it here and see what the perceptions are. The only reason I can think of that people call it trolling is they are somehow triggered by the content, which if so is some serious snowflakeyness.
TheEternalPessimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is dissention in the ranks of the right - which is actually HEALTHY. We need to have debate.

The left rarely has publicized dissent because the cult is protected by the media and establishment to propagate the idea that they have a unified front. That is UNHEALTHY.
--

"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There you have it. FNC is equally capable of lying, just like all the other networks. Meh.

They sold the right message (the election was rigged), but chose the wrong culprit (Dominion).

When do we get to see the text messages between msm and government employees, and social media and government employees when it comes to Covid, hunter's laptop, Russia collusion, etc etc etc.

Government corruption can't just be ignored just because Hannity, Carlson and Ingram maliciously impugned Dominion.
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heloteslotus said:

Honest question to the people claiming "troll": how is posting a link to an article trolling? That's the standard MO for the majority of threads started here. The Dominion defamation lawsuit has brought out some pretty outlandish communications from Fox News and associates, several of which worked directly with or for Trump, but Fox obviously isn't covering it and neither are most other media outlets so I figured post it here and see what the perceptions are. The only reason I can think of that people call it trolling is they are somehow triggered by the content, which if so is some serious snowflakeyness.


What reaction were you expecting as a rookie poster who's first post was to start a thread about a hit piece about election fraud in f16? Sounds very sockish.
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heloteslotus said:

Honest question to the people claiming "troll": how is posting a link to an article trolling? That's the standard MO for the majority of threads started here. The Dominion defamation lawsuit has brought out some pretty outlandish communications from Fox News and associates, several of which worked directly with or for Trump, but Fox obviously isn't covering it and neither are most other media outlets so I figured post it here and see what the perceptions are. The only reason I can think of that people call it trolling is they are somehow triggered by the content, which if so is some serious snowflakeyness.
The boat has left the dock without you.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lmao
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Be honest, y'all don't have any hot cousins?
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The guy is an idiot.
fka ftc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heloteslotus said:

Honest question to the people claiming "troll": how is posting a link to an article trolling? That's the standard MO for the majority of threads started here. The Dominion defamation lawsuit has brought out some pretty outlandish communications from Fox News and associates, several of which worked directly with or for Trump, but Fox obviously isn't covering it and neither are most other media outlets so I figured post it here and see what the perceptions are. The only reason I can think of that people call it trolling is they are somehow triggered by the content, which if so is some serious snowflakeyness.


Same reply 2012Heisman started with, then had them add commentary, then warned them because of drive by topic starting, then warned them again.

Alas, here we are again…
Saxsoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChemEAg08 said:

You think I really care what some producer at Fox News says?
Considering they were pushing the angle on the steal, you any many on this board probably did
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

"Might wanna address this, but this stuff is so f****** insane. Vote rigging to the tune of millions? C'mon," he wrote.
This belief is why it worked.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTKAG97 said:


Quote:

"Might wanna address this, but this stuff is so f****** insane. Vote rigging to the tune of millions? C'mon," he wrote.
This belief is why it worked.


It was possible because of the voter rolls being vastly inflated since ERIC was started in 2012.

Remember back after the 2008 election it was widely touted that Obama had a huge database of voter information to assist his GOTV efforts?

That was the origin of ERIC
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.