More information is bad. Don't release any more footage.

- Totalitarian Left

Mostly peaceful?

But he can't refute the authenticity of the videos Tucker showed.

Hard to gaslight 41,000 hours of footage. Most of it probably benign.

The media and DC Uniparty are despicable scum.

the mainstream media doesn't want you to see all this footage of the titanic not sinking, because it destroys the narrative that the titanic sank

**** those guys. I'm sure they support aid to Ukraine as well.

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

But the point is, that's exactly what they did. They cherry picked the parts they wanted to put out there without the whole story. Now the rest of the story is coming out and they don't like the narratives and are freaking out. And there's the media just pushing it. These people are despicable.

The videos we chose were fine, the videos they chose were not. It's all of the same few hours.

Their lies are being exposed. Criminal election fraud takes a pootload of lies.

C@LAg said:

---

literally discussing gaslighting

Kinzinger: "I could take footage from World War II, find a little piece of it, and convince somebody it's the moon landing."

Cooper: "There's footage of soldiers [in Vietnam] at their bases hanging out in Saigon... You can take video of anybody in the course of a day." pic.twitter.com/8VDoYa5Tsp

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 9, 2023

---

Comparing a single day - or worse yet 4 hours of a day in a single building to 1000s of days of recordings from an entire war and claiming thats some equivalency is rich.

Of course you are going to find benign stuff over the course of 1000s of days. It's hard to actually show any violence, especially inside the capitol outside of a few minutes.

this isn't some random 4 hours in something larger scale. this is the 4 hours of supposedly a violent coup attempt.

I've maintained from the beginning this is the first supposed coup attempt in history where the perpetrators simply walked out after and went home.

Old McDonald said:

---

the mainstream media doesn't want you to see all this footage of the titanic not sinking, because it destroys the narrative that the titanic sank

---

Questions you won't answer:

If the footage supports your narrative then why are you against the people seeing all of it in context? And what about the footage disproving your narratives about Buffalo Shaman and the Capital cop? Seems like you're trying to ignore that those lies have been disproven already by the footage

Losing the narrative to facts is always tough for hardcore ideologists to deal with. Bless their hearts.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

George Orwell, 1984

TomFoolery said:

---

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

---

I'm not naive enough to think cherry picking isn't happening on both sides of this. The difference is Tucker is willing to admit there were bad actors at the Capitol that day and any unwarranted attacks on police and actions like bashing in windows were wrong.

The other side refuses to acknowledge the vast majority of people there were not doing anything wrong at all and in other cases were flat encouraged by Capitol police.

Bunk Moreland said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

---

I'm not naive enough to think it isn't happening on both sides of this. The difference is Tucker is willing to admit there were bad actors at the Capitol that day and any unwarranted attacks and actions like bashing in windows were wrong.

The other side refuses to acknowledge the vast majority of people there were not doing anything wrong at all and in other cases were flat encouraged by Capitol police.

---

The difference is we already saw the other side, so no need to show it again. Showing us the parts we haven't seen is what's important, people should make their decision/opinion on the full situation, not just half the story regardless of the side.

Democrats who weaponized the footage wanted to maintain control over it. Perfectly understandable if you are a Democrat.

TomFoolery said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

---

I'm not naive enough to think it isn't happening on both sides of this. The difference is Tucker is willing to admit there were bad actors at the Capitol that day and any unwarranted attacks and actions like bashing in windows were wrong.

The other side refuses to acknowledge the vast majority of people there were not doing anything wrong at all and in other cases were flat encouraged by Capitol police.

---

The difference is we already saw the other side, so no need to show it again. Showing us the parts we haven't seen is what's important, people should make their decision/opinion on the full situation, not just half the story regardless of the side.

---

Tucker's producers had access to 40k hours. We're not seeing all of any side. We're seeing things cut and produced for talking points to justify an argument. I've watched every night this week so far and I've seen maybe 4-7 full minutes of new tape.

I'm not saying they're hiding anything per say. I'll take them at their word that they're showing relevant footage but I think both sides are playing games. I'm with Cruz. Release it all to the public and let us decide.

Bunk Moreland said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

Bunk Moreland said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

---

I'm not naive enough to think it isn't happening on both sides of this. The difference is Tucker is willing to admit there were bad actors at the Capitol that day and any unwarranted attacks and actions like bashing in windows were wrong.

The other side refuses to acknowledge the vast majority of people there were not doing anything wrong at all and in other cases were flat encouraged by Capitol police.

---

The difference is we already saw the other side, so no need to show it again. Showing us the parts we haven't seen is what's important, people should make their decision/opinion on the full situation, not just half the story regardless of the side.

---

Tucker's producers had access to 40k hours. We're not seeing all of any side. We're seeing things cut and produced for talking points to justify an argument. I've watched every night this week so far and I've seen maybe 4-7 full minutes of new tape.

I'm not saying they're hiding anything per say. I'll take them at their word that they're showing relevant footage but I think both sides are playing games. I'm with Cruz. Release it all to the public and let us decide.

---

Agreed they should just release it all. I'm just saying the "worst" footage has presumably been shown during the senate investigation and already existing media coverage. I don't think they're sitting on footage that shows more violence than we've already seen.

Definitely agree with that.

I thought cnn changed mgmt & vowed to quit being communist propaganda….


What happened w that?

Gaslit...

Merrick Garland just lied by stating 5 officers died because Jan. 6. pic.twitter.com/2Mcn2fyznN

— ⚜ • 𝕸𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖊𝖑 • ⚜ (@BasedSolutions1) March 7, 2023

It is really amazing that the number of Capital Police that were "injured" during the "insurrection" has grown to over 170 now, according to their Chief of Police.

Both parties are cherry picking the video that gets released….and it seems to achieve the desired effect. Transparency is all of the video released to all of the people. Until that happens, we are all being gaslighted.

BboroAg said:

---

Both parties are cherry picking the video that gets released….and it seems to achieve the desired effect. Transparency is all of the video released to all of the people. Until that happens, we are all being gaslighted.

---

This footage has already disproven two of the Lefts biggest lies regarding J6 and cast even more suspicion on Ray Epps as an FBI agent provocateur

Gator92 said:

---

Gaslit...

Merrick Garland just lied by stating 5 officers died because Jan. 6. pic.twitter.com/2Mcn2fyznN

— ⚜ • 𝕸𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖊𝖑 • ⚜ (@BasedSolutions1) March 7, 2023

---

I don't know why he's continuing to hang his hat on convictions after the release of the QAnon Shaman footage.

The House needs to appoint a J6 investigation committee and apply facial recognition software to the video of suspect characters that are believed to be government agents.

BboroAg said:

---

Both parties are cherry picking the video that gets released….and it seems to achieve the desired effect. Transparency is all of the video released to all of the people. Until that happens, we are all being gaslighted.

---

LOL. It certainly "achieved the desired effect" of the left. They used it to paint half of America as domestic terrorists that are a threat to democracy. The effect was to influence the mid-terms, but the long term effect they are hoping for is for Trump to never be in the WH again.

What "desired effect" was achieved by the right? To tell the WHOLE story? If so, count me in.

I wonder why we aren't being shown video of that area outside near some tunnel, where a woman was supposedly beaten to death by police then carried into the building? I've always assumed that video would be bad for the Dem's case.

Wabs said:

---

BboroAg said:

---

Both parties are cherry picking the video that gets released….and it seems to achieve the desired effect. Transparency is all of the video released to all of the people. Until that happens, we are all being gaslighted.

---

LOL. It certainly "achieved the desired effect" of the left. They used it to paint half of America as domestic terrorists that are a threat to democracy. The effect was to influence the mid-terms, but the long term effect they are hoping for is for Trump to never be in the WH again.

What "desired effect" was achieved by the right? To tell the WHOLE story? If so, count me in.

---

The desired effect is both sides are armed to blaim the other side for cherry picking coverage...so doubt still exists.

Release it all and let the public watch. Of course there will still be different opinions, but the argument of cherry picking would be rendered moot.

How long do you think it takes to comb through 40,000 hours of video? How many people do you need? What's the budget? Are there limits? Did the government have those same limitations?

If Tucker were going to go through all of the footage, we wouldn't have seen any so far and we wouldn't for a long time. The government knew this was there and couldn't be bothered to release a truthful picture of what happened.

annie88 said:

---

But the point is, that's exactly what they did. They cherry picked the parts they wanted to put out there without the whole story. Now the rest of the story is coming out and they don't like the narratives and are freaking out. And there's the media just pushing it. These people are despicable.

The videos we chose were fine, the videos they chose were not. It's all of the same few hours.

---

Yes... At least Tucker didn't ADD fabricated angry crowd noises to the videos in the capital like the Jan 6th show trial did.

Bunk Moreland said:

---

TomFoolery said:

---

Don't cherry pick footage!! We've already told you what footage you should see

---

I'm not naive enough to think cherry picking isn't happening on both sides of this. The difference is Tucker is willing to admit there were bad actors at the Capitol that day and any unwarranted attacks on police and actions like bashing in windows were wrong.

The other side refuses to acknowledge the vast majority of people there were not doing anything wrong at all and in other cases were flat encouraged by Capitol police.

---

And, I think more importantly, the left wants America to believe J6 was something Trump orchestrated. What Tucker's footage shows is perhaps it is 180 degrees the opposite. Perhaps the left was simply following their Rules for Radicals and didn't let a good crisis go to waste by letting protesters into the Capital and then spinning it into 'Orange Man VERY dangerous to the future of America!!!'

I think if it got released publicly, anons on those sites like 4chan/8 chan or whatever they are on these days, would figure it out real quick.

I've only seen Monday's show from Tucker, but it seems to me that he's "cherry-picking" videos to specifically refute the Left's talking points/lies. He's not trying to say that nothing bad happened that day - only that the Left is lying about a lot of things.