TAMU: Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry approved

2,142 Views | 17 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by ChemEAg08
GinMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not. Another. Dime.

I'm all in favor of safe and affordable food and fiber…but that's not what this is about…


The good guys on board for controlling cow farts…and other stuff pertinent to the climate crisis scam.


Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry approved

To meet the needs of growing populations amid changing climates, the new Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry will focus on creating systems for safe, affordable food and fiber production. A collaboration between AgriLife Research and Texas A&M University, the center will strive to create production systems with a minimal carbon footprint, aiming toward net-zero emissions.

https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2023/02/09/texas-am-board-of-regents-approve-center-for-greenhouse-gas-management-in-agriculture-and-forestry/
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the school wasn't run by woke socialists, TAMU would build a Center for Children Who Can't Read Good and Wanna Learn to Do Other Stuff Good Too.
Icecream_Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieVictor10 said:

If the school wasn't run by woke socialists, TAMU would build a Center for Children Who Can't Read Good and Wanna Learn to Do Other Stuff Good Too.

but would it be built for ants?
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have a degree in Forestry and hate this climate change greenhouse gas propaganda
TxTarpon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eat this:


Emit this:


Is that illegal yet?
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like it or not the amount of money pouring into agriculture for Environmental and Sustainability projects is astronomical at the moment.

We would run 1-2 late stage R&D projects a year at work. I'm running 7-8 this year. I can double an approved budget if I can add a sustainability angle to a project.

And the professors are getting really greedy with the proposal "asks". Which to me is a sign that there are some groups out there paying those prices for "validation" projects.
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GinMan said:

Not. Another. Dime.

I'm all in favor of safe and affordable food and fiber…but that's not what this is about…


The good guys on board for controlling cow farts…and other stuff pertinent to the climate crisis scam.


Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry approved

To meet the needs of growing populations amid changing climates, the new Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry will focus on creating systems for safe, affordable food and fiber production. A collaboration between AgriLife Research and Texas A&M University, the center will strive to create production systems with a minimal carbon footprint, aiming toward net-zero emissions.

https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2023/02/09/texas-am-board-of-regents-approve-center-for-greenhouse-gas-management-in-agriculture-and-forestry/

Hate to tell you but the folks in Ag and Forestry are predominately NOT liberals. If you think they are, then I dare someone to write an Op Ed with their name on it stating as much.
GinMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fightingfarmer09 said:

Like it or not the amount of money pouring into agriculture for Environmental and Sustainability projects is astronomical at the moment.

We would run 1-2 late stage R&D projects a year at work. I'm running 7-8 this year. I can double an approved budget if I can add a sustainability angle to a project.

And the professors are getting really greedy with the proposal "asks". Which to me is a sign that there are some groups out there paying those prices for "validation" projects.


Excellent segway into the next article:


An increasing demand for agriculture and life sciences graduates

One of the largest career fairs at Texas A&M University, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Career Fair this spring, brought 90 different businesses and organizations, with more on the waitlist, to network with in-demand students.

https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2023/02/15/agriculture-and-life-sciences-students-in-demand/

even agriculture is forced to get woke. I've been in agriculture my entire life and this is getting a little out of hand

GinMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu said:

GinMan said:

Not. Another. Dime.

I'm all in favor of safe and affordable food and fiber…but that's not what this is about…


The good guys on board for controlling cow farts…and other stuff pertinent to the climate crisis scam.


Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry approved

To meet the needs of growing populations amid changing climates, the new Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry will focus on creating systems for safe, affordable food and fiber production. A collaboration between AgriLife Research and Texas A&M University, the center will strive to create production systems with a minimal carbon footprint, aiming toward net-zero emissions.

https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2023/02/09/texas-am-board-of-regents-approve-center-for-greenhouse-gas-management-in-agriculture-and-forestry/

Hate to tell you but the folks in Ag and Forestry are predominately NOT liberals. If you think they are, then I dare someone to write an Op Ed with their name on it stating as much.


Hate to tell you…everyone is aware of the fact you state. Is the force that's driving agriculture into the direction I'm worried about…The people of agriculture aren't driving this initiative. I'm worried about the people in the drivers seat
Flavius Agximus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GinMan said:



Hate to tell you…everyone is aware of the fact you state. Is the force that's driving agriculture into the direction I'm worried about…The people of agriculture aren't driving this initiative. I'm worried about the people in the drivers seat
Everyone likes money, and just like energy "transition", green hydrogen, wind, etc., right now the spigots are open.

"The goal for all our teams at Texas A&M is to perform at a consistently high level and compete for conference and national titles."
Charles Hickson Knows
How long do you want to ignore this user?
$$$$$$$$$$
Our thoughts on the current controlled EXTRATERRESTRIAL reality disclosure process and related US GOV cover-up? Once the uneasy, contagious giggling subsides, how will our civilization and the mislead sheep adapt to this publicly known reality? Are the good Shepherds withholding the truth in our best interest? Perhaps multiple species are involved?
EX TEXASEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there was truth in advertising.

TAMU: WEF/George Soros/Deep State Center for Population Enslavement Through Public Policy
Mondemonium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GinMan said:

BluHorseShu said:

GinMan said:

Not. Another. Dime.

I'm all in favor of safe and affordable food and fiber…but that's not what this is about…


The good guys on board for controlling cow farts…and other stuff pertinent to the climate crisis scam.


Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry approved

To meet the needs of growing populations amid changing climates, the new Center for Greenhouse Gas Management in Agriculture and Forestry will focus on creating systems for safe, affordable food and fiber production. A collaboration between AgriLife Research and Texas A&M University, the center will strive to create production systems with a minimal carbon footprint, aiming toward net-zero emissions.

https://agrilifetoday.tamu.edu/2023/02/09/texas-am-board-of-regents-approve-center-for-greenhouse-gas-management-in-agriculture-and-forestry/

Hate to tell you but the folks in Ag and Forestry are predominately NOT liberals. If you think they are, then I dare someone to write an Op Ed with their name on it stating as much.


Hate to tell you…everyone is aware of the fact you state. Is the force that's driving agriculture into the direction I'm worried about…The people of agriculture aren't driving this initiative. I'm worried about the people in the drivers seat
Who is in the 'drivers seat' that you speak of that dictates what research is done? I'm actually not disagreeing that there is, but I would think that 1) the researchers have a large say in what they commit their time to...but I acknowledge that 2) Much of this is all driven by grant money. So if there is a ton of money out there for people to apply for to do research on this....then even conservative researchers could be motivated to do the work. I would think that if the results disprove anything would just be a bonus.
longviewag04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While the buzzwords in the group's name and statement are agitating, my hope is that A&M's foray into this field is not down the complete lunacy green movement "get rid of cattle" type movement, but more in line with researching the areas such as regenerative agriculture that is taking hold in places like North Dakota, and other great plains states. Also, in other areas such as solving the fertilizer runoff issues in the various waterways.

Example : Aggies such as Dr. Rick Haney and his soil testing break throughs with regards to fertilizer amounts needed are examples where Texas A&M needs to be industry leaders in innovation and expanding the field. I am whole heartedly in line with A&M opening that type of research even if it falls under "green initiatives".

The "buzzwords" bring in the money, but the true key is the direction the research is guided. Stick to innovations that move the industries forward and expanding should be the guiding principle.
TheHungryDonkey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
there is some great research being done at TAMU on carbon sequestration, including some that could potentially produce products profitably while being carbon negative. using technology to reduce greenhouse gases, particularly if it can be done in a profitable capitalist way, is an infinitely more viable way to deal with greenhouse gas than depending on cutting use. It is the opposite of the socialist boogeyman.
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Made me think of Kramer giving the horse Beefarino.

ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People that think CO2 causes significant climate warming.

If CO2 is so bad, they should stopping emitting from their lungs.

It is a religion to them.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.