Escess Deaths in the UK (Dr. John Campbell video)

3,002 Views | 28 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by BusterAg
Change Detection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excess deaths in the UK and EU are getting some notice. EU is realizing the COVID and the subsequent vax scam that followed (go to the 6:40 mark) were not about treating a virus.

Dr Campbell was a good source of information during the COVID scare and provided some reality to the numbers being spouted by various government organizations in the UK and USA.

I have to conclude that he believes the excess numbers of deaths in the UK and Europe are related to the disinformation provided during the pandemic.

Excess Deaths in UK (COVID Treatment?)
Sims
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At the very least, the shutdowns/quarantine/lockdown cycle prevented months, if not years, of routine screenings that would have caught some serious issues early. That by itself is going to cause a spike in deaths.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The vaxxes are suddenly-ing people (unfortunetly). Pretty obvious.
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone been to F84 lately to see if they are posting this kind of information??
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
WoMD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WolfCall said:

Anyone been to F84 lately to see if they are posting this kind of information??

Any information that isn't about remaining in fear or isn't pro-vaccine is eliminated within minutes and the poster banned. Even wanting to discuss something that could be potentially questioning the information we're allowed to discuss gets censored and an auto ban. Ask me how I know this…

Pretty incredible that this is STILL happening on this site. Insanity.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WoMD said:

WolfCall said:

Anyone been to F84 lately to see if they are posting this kind of information??

Any information that isn't about remaining in fear or isn't pro-vaccine is eliminated within minutes and the poster banned. Even wanting to discuss something that could be potentially questioning the information we're allowed to discuss gets censored and an auto ban. Ask me how I know this…

Pretty incredible that this is STILL happening on this site. Insanity.
Let those cowards drink their koolaid (pfizer boosters). The problem will sort itself out.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL OLD
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Change Detection said:

Excess deaths in the UK and EU are getting some notice. EU is realizing the COVID and the subsequent vax scam that followed (go to the 6:40 mark) were not about treating a virus.

Dr Campbell was a good source of information during the COVID scare and provided some reality to the numbers being spouted by various government organizations in the UK and USA.

I have to conclude that he believes the excess numbers of deaths in the UK and Europe are related to the disinformation provided during the pandemic.

Excess Deaths in UK (COVID Treatment?)
Interesting information thanks.
Calls for urgent investigation after thousands die from non-Covid conditions Comment author image Emma Brazell Wednesday 17 Nov 2021 8:20 am
  • Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, told The Telegraph thousands of excess deaths were linked to 'potentially reversible' conditions like ischemic heart disease, cirrhosis of the liver and diabetes.

    He said: 'This goes beyond just looking at the raw numbers and death certificates. We need to go back and find if these deaths have any preventable causes.
  • The number of deaths in private homes is also 40.9% above the five-year average, with 'most of the excess deaths not involving Covid-19'.
sleepybeagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
Emerson said "it's hard to see a field when you're standing in it".
Also - who butters the bread for the MD's and PHd in this field?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Minister was using information provided.
MP calls for 'urgent' investigation into soaring deaths 27th January
  • Speaking in Parliament Ms McVey said: "The chief medical officer recently warned that non-covid excess deaths are being driven in part by patients not getting statins or blood pressure medicines during the pandemic.
  • However, when looking at the data on statins on OpenPrescribing.net, which is based on monthly NHS prescribing, there appears not to be a drop.
    "Where is the evidence? If there is none, what is causing these excess deaths?".
    Ms McVey said government should commit to an 'urgent and thorough' investigation on the matter and publish its findings.
    Health Minister Maria Caulfield said: "We are seeing an increase in excess deaths in this country, but we are also seeing that in Wales, Scotland Northern Ireland and across Europe. There is a range of factors.

So some people are pointing a finger at the messager neglecting the source of the information.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
F84 exists expressly to keep the paranoid or authoritarian loons over there, and not preaching their obsolete dogma on other forums.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

F84 exists expressly to keep the paranoid or authoritarian loons over there, and not preaching their obsolete dogma on other forums.
Nice.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Not anymore, the "experts" saw to that, and since Dr. Campbell is an expert, we will take him at his word.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
coincidences. have to be. don't wait for proof. go get vaxxed and boosted. immediately.
/covidians
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

coincidences. have to be. don't wait for proof. go get vaxxed and boosted. immediately.
/covidians
I am fine with it, us purebloods will live on...
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.
Please point us to some authoritative experts so all us simpletons know who to trust.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.
We go with Dr's and experts, both are up to the standard since F84 was started.
Change Detection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I encourage you to look at his posting history. You won't because you need to fire shots blindly into the dark and be the center of attention.

He gathers information from released government sources and shows that information.

What exactly is my narrative?
AmC_OldSarge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.

Could you please explain the errors in the information he has presented? Seems he is just conveying the statistical research (peer reviewed) and presenting it. Does it take a MD to do that? Does your PHD give your opinion more weight than his? You seem to have an expert level of knowledge about all things, especially anything that goes against the official narrative.
redcrayon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
Do you care to react to the information he presented?
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Of which the most renown doctors and "disease experts" have all but lost after being exposed over and over and over again as being dead wrong, or even lying in many cases.

Also, I'd say that 95% or more of practicing doctors still believe that cloth masks are effective and that vax/boosters > natural immunity. I can't tell you how much faith I have lost in doctors and scientists over the last few years. Mofo's still can't decided what foods are healthy or not over these many years.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.
The source is the Chief Medical Officer.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.


There are no credible experts left.

Do your own math, show your work. Thorough analysis is way more reliable than expert credibility.

Excees deaths are still elevated, enough that insurance companies are signaling lower earnings and increasing premiums on seemingly healthy people.

What is your theory on why? Or do you deny the excess death anomoly?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Pookers said:

TXAGFAN said:

Not an MD nor is his Phd in this field, just saying. Seems that discussion gets a lot of play here, but you're good with this "Dr" because he supports your narrative?
You don't need to be a MD / PHD to look at data and make reasonable assertions as to what's happening. This is essentially an ad hom you're doing here.
Credibility matters.
Doubling down on stupid I see.
Not at all, just find it curious what sources are considered authoritative here and there's a trend.
authoritative?

Never trust a source or opinion. Only analysis.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.