Sundance Film Festival [Kavanaugh documentary]

3,362 Views | 23 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by jrdaustin
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No surprise here....
https://www.indiewire.com/2023/01/secret-brett-kavanaugh-documentary-doug-liman-sundance-1234801731/
I'm sure it will win the highest 'honor'.
Highway6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The ultimate "wokefest"
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pdc093 said:

No surprise here....
https://www.indiewire.com/2023/01/secret-brett-kavanaugh-documentary-doug-liman-sundance-1234801731/
I'm sure it will win the highest 'honor'.
I will say there is a possibility, subsequent to this film debuting, I will again be recommending our slander and libel laws need revising. Revising with the caveat the wording is precise because any opening would open the door for the corrupt Democratic Party leadership to abuse it. The Democratic Party leadership would go on full attack mode against conservatives right to free speech.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even if (IF!) what they said about Kavanaugh is true, it's a boring story.

You want a high quality story about a contemporary political scandal? Make a film on the Bidens or the permanent bureaucracy.
Dimebag Darrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas said:

Even if (IF!) what they said about Kavanaugh is true, it's a boring story.

You want a high quality story about a contemporary political scandal? Make a film on the Bidens or the permanent bureaucracy.
Yep, even if the absurd allegations were true, just another case of...

BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To make it more creditable I hope he didn't interview Blassey Ford.
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

....any opening would open the door for the corrupt Democratic Party leadership to abuse it. The Democratic Party leadership would go on full attack mode against conservatives right to free speech.
THIS is the ultimate goal of these liberal filmmakers. They present this crap at their indie festivals, KNOWING the viewing audience will have the perception of TRUTH as the basis of the film. Thus, as richardag posted, the pols will use it in campaign ads to gin up their stupid voters/base.

I'm SO sick of this stuff. And there is NO END in sight to it.
Very deflating...
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ78 said:

To make it more creditable I hope he didn't interview Blassey Ford.
Of COURSE they did! They wouldn't have their 'film' without her, and the other (what was it) TWO liars that were compelled to come forward with their BS.
It really makes the blood boil.....
Help_needed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are they rehashing ***** Ford and her truth bs? ***** is a ****ing skank.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

We saw it practically yesterday, and it's a film that I think challenges existing narratives, I think it asks tough questions, and I think it provokes conversations."
I would love to have a "conversation" with any lib or CM on F16 about Ford's pathetic, groundless accusations. Go watch this film and report back. Can't wait.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It shouldn't be this hard to have an open and honest conversation about whether or not a Justice on the Supreme Court assaulted numerous women as a young man..."

Uhh, they did. It was called the confirmation hearings. CBF had the opportunity to make selacious allegations, provide no proof, be unable to have witnesses corroborate her story, claim selective memory - It happened at a party. I don't know exactly when, or exactly where, but I know HE did it...

And numerous? We have two women who have made accusations, both with ties to democrats, and both lacking any evidence beyond their accusation.

And now I'm sure this crack investigative report is now going to provide all the details.



Help_needed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It would be nice to be able to bump the threads about this. We could see all the idiots who kissed ***** Ford's ass
Omperlodge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I truly believe that Ford reported the incident to Feinstein. It is so strange that she never told anyone about it until she reported it to Feinstein, but I don't think they recruited her, but we will never know. They then put a team on it to come up with the facts to support her claim. It is just too perfect that the other two guys were the absolute worst people from the school and there really is no link to Brett other than they went to the school Since they provided her with the narrative, it was tough for her to answer questions. They also never thought he would have a daily journal.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Help_needed said:

It would be nice to be able to bump the threads about this. We could see all the idiots who kissed ***** Ford's ass
And every single one of them still believes it to be 100% true.
PCC_80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It has always completely amazed me that a completely unsupported allegation by someone with a political axe to grind is accepted as absolutely true by so many people. There was absolutely no proof, no witnesses or even a record of bad behavior by the accused but so many people excepted the accusation without a single question. The accuser could not even say when or where this happened. Amazing people will not even ask a single question.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PCC_80 said:

It has always completely amazed me that a completely unsupported allegation by someone with a political axe to grind is accepted as absolutely true by so many people. There was absolutely no proof, no witnesses or even a record of bad behavior by the accused but so many people excepted the accusation without a single question. The accuser could not even say when or where this happened. Amazing people will not even ask a single question.


Oh, but he's a SCOTUS justice and has politics we don't like. So, he's GOT to be guilty.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PCC_80 said:

It has always completely amazed me that a completely unsupported allegation by someone with a political axe to grind is accepted as absolutely true by so many people. There was absolutely no proof, no witnesses or even a record of bad behavior by the accused but so many people excepted the accusation without a single question. The accuser could not even say when or where this happened. Amazing people will not even ask a single question.
That's the problem with ideologues; they'll believe anything so long as it is something negative against someone they hate, even if there's nothing more than, "but I read about it on the internet, or I heard someone say...".

Our world was always on a collision course to pure idiocracy, and thanks to the interwebs/social media, the impact is all but here.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jrdaustin said:

"It shouldn't be this hard to have an open and honest conversation about whether or not a Justice on the Supreme Court assaulted numerous women as a young man..."

Uhh, they did. It was called the confirmation hearings. CBF had the opportunity to make selacious allegations, provide no proof, be unable to have witnesses corroborate her story, claim selective memory - It happened at a party. I don't know exactly when, or exactly where, but I know HE did it...

And numerous? We have two women who have made accusations, both with ties to democrats, and both lacking any evidence beyond their accusation.

And now I'm sure this crack investigative report is now going to provide all the details.




Never forget that the final "witness" brought forth on this was a lady who didn't even want to be one yet was used by the Democrats to try and push this narrative. VP Kamala Harris did an interview on NPR where she was using this witness as the gotcha on Kavanaugh, and to her credit, the NPR gal interviewing Kamala literally scoffed and laughed at her over it.

The fact that Kamala and the Dems were trying to use a lady as a witness who had already publicly denied what was being claimed on her behalf is beyond the pale but normal SOP for Democrats. That interview was effectively the last we ever heard of that witness.

I listened to this live in my car when it happened. It was amazing to actually hear an NPR host practically ridicule Kamala over this.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Meanwhile, Tara Reade's accusations were instantly dismissed and not given even a hint of scrutiny

Almost like it's #MeTooButNotIfAccusingDemocrats
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Twitter, as expected, is orgasmic this morning. They think Kavanaugh is going to be led from the Supreme Court in chains. Kavanaugh has been the top trend much of the morning.

And apparently they've got another hit piece coming out, this one targeting Jim Jordan.
gonemaroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She claimed there were witnesses. The witnesses said it didn't happen.

So her word verses his word - and her own witnesses said no.

Case closed.
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Twitter, as expected, is orgasmic this morning. They think Kavanaugh is going to be led from the Supreme Court in chains. Kavanaugh has been the top trend much of the morning.

And apparently they've got another hit piece coming out, this one targeting Jim Jordan.
**** Gym Jordan

Also in the Doug Liman catalog Swingers is overrated and Go is underrated.
Bobaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I posted here before that the Kav hearings were a turning point. A great blight on our republic. A career straight A student, good husband and father, tremendous legal career and a model citizen was smeared beyond recognition by a group of lying liars. It is clear that patriots must play for keeps if the lying liars are to be defeated.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think that when/if this film becomes available, I'm going to make an effort to see it.

Unless something irrefutable is out forward, it should be a textbook example of pure propaganda.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.