Have you ever seen a lawyer getting ready to go to trial on Monday morning who has one witness and didn't think that there was any need to subpoena the only witness -- that the witness had to be there without a subpoena?
The lawyer appears to have no litigation experience at all and seems to think that the only element of defamation that needs to be proven is that the defendant made the statement. In other words, they don't even have to prove any damages at all? Without a witness to the statement, will the jury even have anything to consider in reaching a verdict?
Here's the pretrial conference:
Added bonus: the attorney is sanctioned repeatedly in the pretrial conference for contempt of court.
The pretrial conference was on Friday. How long does it take to subpoena a witness? Is it at all possible for her to subpoena the witness in time for a trial on Monday?
The lawyer appears to have no litigation experience at all and seems to think that the only element of defamation that needs to be proven is that the defendant made the statement. In other words, they don't even have to prove any damages at all? Without a witness to the statement, will the jury even have anything to consider in reaching a verdict?
Here's the pretrial conference:
Added bonus: the attorney is sanctioned repeatedly in the pretrial conference for contempt of court.
The pretrial conference was on Friday. How long does it take to subpoena a witness? Is it at all possible for her to subpoena the witness in time for a trial on Monday?