Boebert wins!

11,003 Views | 118 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Ag with kids
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Frisch conceded.

https://archive.ph/Th6Yb
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great news! Every single win is important right now!
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is still going to be a recount...
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted. Just the way it is!!
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?

There shouldn't be when there is a concession. It should actually hinge on the contestants desires.
Franklin Comes Alive!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGA
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's the count now for the House? I know the R's have it but curious what the final tally is.
Sarge 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
justcallmeharry said:

There is still going to be a recount...
The party requesting a recount has to pay for it. I doubt Fritsch has the funds and the DNC won't do it if it won't affect the balance of power in the House.
The Dirty Sock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sooooo....no OF?
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dirty Sock said:

Sooooo....no OF?

Asking the important questions. I also like my women a little on the trashy side.
Truvada
How long do you want to ignore this user?
but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's always a good thing when salt of the earth middle class Americans have a chance to run government
blacksox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?
Valtrex_11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?
thats the talking point now? hilarious
Buzzy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?
Someone is salty
Wild West Pimp Style
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


That fact she won by 500 votes is pretty sad where she lives. She clearly isn't popular in a very red district. Glad we got the seat but something is wrong for it to have even been close.
Valtrex_11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoydCrowder13 said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


That fact she won by 500 votes is pretty sad where she lives. She clearly isn't popular in a very red district. Glad we got the seat but something is wrong for it to have even been close.
so do you say the same when democrat barley wins in a largley dem area? what an odd flex
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP Fail!


BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Valtrex_11 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


That fact she won by 500 votes is pretty sad where she lives. She clearly isn't popular in a very red district. Glad we got the seat but something is wrong for it to have even been close.
so do you say the same when democrat barley wins in a largley dem area? what an odd flex


I would. That is called logic.
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?


Didn't the DEMs in Colorado gerrymander her district to try to beat her?
Nuke_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wasn't her district redrawn? Can't remember if that helped or hindered.
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sarge 91 said:

justcallmeharry said:

There is still going to be a recount...
The party requesting a recount has to pay for it. I doubt Fritsch has the funds and the DNC won't do it if it won't affect the balance of power in the House.
"Although there will be an automatic recount done by the Colorado secretary of state's office, Frisch said in a live Facebook speech that he did not ask for a recount, does not expect the results to change and does not want there to be fundraising done for an essentially fruitless cause.

As of Friday morning, with almost all the votes tallied, Boebert led Frisch by only 551 votes in what had been considered a safely Republican western Colorado district. In Colorado, any race decided by a margin that's 0.5% or less of the votes earned by the top finisher is automatically recounted. The current margin of 551 votes is about 0.34% of Boebert's 163,758 votes.

According to information published by the Colorado Secretary of State's office, all but one of the counties in the Western Slope district have finished reporting votes."

It sounds like there has to be a recount even if nobody requests it. Unless Boebert ends up with .51 % or more.

ETA - I am hoping that Boebert wins, but hate the thought of a recount.
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted. Just the way it is!!
Valtrex_11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoydCrowder13 said:

Valtrex_11 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


That fact she won by 500 votes is pretty sad where she lives. She clearly isn't popular in a very red district. Glad we got the seat but something is wrong for it to have even been close.
so do you say the same when democrat barley wins in a largley dem area? what an odd flex


I would. That is called logic.
again weird flex tight races happen all over the country but if it makes you feel better


Also, very rare that a recount would change the outcome..logic
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Valtrex_11 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Valtrex_11 said:

BoydCrowder13 said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


That fact she won by 500 votes is pretty sad where she lives. She clearly isn't popular in a very red district. Glad we got the seat but something is wrong for it to have even been close.
so do you say the same when democrat barley wins in a largley dem area? what an odd flex


I would. That is called logic.
again weird flex tight races happen all over the country but if it makes you feel better


Also, very rare that a recount would change the outcome..logic
What happened to Valtrex_10?
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
frankly, Boebert, Masters, Lake, Bolduc, Mastriano, Cox, Walker, Tudor Dixon were all disasters

it is a GOP +9 District for heavens sake!!

and you guys are ecstatic that the bomb throwing self-promoter could hang on by .19%



deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?
NPH-
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dirty Sock said:

Sooooo....no OF?
Frederick Palowaski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ramdiesel said:

blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?


Didn't the DEMs in Colorado gerrymander her district to try to beat her?


Yes, but nobody can tell if the poster is that dumb or intentionally obtuse.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?


It's not solidly red at all her district got redrawn against her
thegoodolag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

frankly, Boebert, Masters, Lake, Bolduc, Mastriano, Cox, Walker, Tudor Dixon were all disasters

it is a GOP +9 District for heavens sake!!

and you guys are ecstatic that the bomb throwing self-promoter could hang on by .19%






John Fetterman is such a strong substantive candidate. His debate was so full of riveting moral and political philosophy that would have made the Athenians fall down in praise.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?


WestTexasAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great news! Now if she can just tone down the Trumpish BS on Twitter it would be even better.
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A_Gang_Ag_06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LegalDrugPusher said:






sloppyjoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blacksox said:

Truvada said:

but but f16 told me she would lose because she is a maga.


Congrats on winning a solidly red district by a few hundred votes?
Her opponent must not have had a masters' degree. That's got to be it.
Buzzy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

frankly, Boebert, Masters, Lake, Bolduc, Mastriano, Cox, Walker, Tudor Dixon were all disasters

it is a GOP +9 District for heavens sake!!

and you guys are ecstatic that the bomb throwing self-promoter could hang on by .19%




This is certainly a sane individual:

Quote:

Mother of dinosaurs. ISU anti. She/her. The dinosaurs are trans. I am cis.

Wild West Pimp Style
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.