Sarge 91 said:
What the hell does any of that mean and how does it relate to the thread title?
Sorry I am ignorant of most things Twitter.
One of the theories of the twitter algorithms is that certain nodes of left thinking personalities were getting artificial/fake likes, retweets, and trending bonuses to make the opinions feel more widely accepted and 'factual' than what organic, natural engagement would support.
If a person sees 100k people "liking" something, that person is more inclined to "like" it as well.
If 99.5k of the 100k were "faked" and just the twitter servers putting up a fake number for users to see, then we would have no way of knowing what was actually trending and instead being shown a curated listed of topics that twitter decided to put as the 'trending' list. All of those "tweets you may like" is not an actual list of things you may like, it's a list of things twitter wants you to like.
And it goes the other way too. If a topic and tweet were very popular but goes against twitter's stated views, it would be suppressed in such a way to limit how it much joe blow user would see.
the TL;DR: Twitter showed its users what it wanted to show its users and would slant and bias "rigththink" upwards and more widely and suppress "wrongthink".