LinkQuote:
The Trump administration's plan to top off the Strategic Petroleum Reserve ran into a blockade Wednesday after lawmakers excluded $3 billion in funding for oil purchases from the massive stimulus package before Congress.
Senate Democrats took credit for stripping out that money from the Senate bill, unveiled Wednesday, calling it a "bailout" for the oil industry.
The administration had announced plans to buy 77 million barrels enough to fill the reserve. The SPR has about 640 million barrels of oil and filling it up would cost about $2.3 billion, at current prices.
While a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., pointed to the exclusion of the "$3 billion bailout for big oil," a summary of the House Democrats' stimulus focused on legislation to codify the decision to delay sales from the SPR.
"If you believe in the purpose of the SPR, now is the perfect time to make sure it's full," Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette said on March 19 of the low prices. "The purpose of this is to mitigate these types of disruptions," he said. "We're expecting that Congress is going to be supportive of this." The DOE proposal is open to small and midsize U.S. producers with fewer than 5,000 employees.
Democrats 2019-2020 - Fill the reserve with $30 per barrel oil - bailout for oil industryp_bubel said:Quote:
The Trump administration's plan to top off the Strategic Petroleum Reserve ran into a blockade Wednesday after lawmakers excluded $3 billion in funding for oil purchases from the massive stimulus package before Congress.
Senate Democrats took credit for stripping out that money from the Senate bill, unveiled Wednesday, calling it a "bailout" for the oil industry.
The administration had announced plans to buy 77 million barrels enough to fill the reserve. The SPR has about 640 million barrels of oil and filling it up would cost about $2.3 billion, at current prices.
Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Manhattan said:Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Cut off your nose to own the libs? Can someone please bump the original strategic release thread where everyone said it wouldn't make a dent in price?
This. Using the Reserve isn't a long term solution by any stretch. It's an emergency reserve not a political tool and honestly the way Biden is using it should be illegal. What Biden is doing will temporarily stabilize or perhaps reduce prices but it comes at a huge cost. Even if the Reserve is full it is only enough oil to keep the country going for a little over a month. Thus we will need to fill it back up only in when we refill it we will have a double whammy of not only stopping the "help" that using it to reduce prices but we will increase demand by buying the oil back at a higher price and when it is in even shorter supply thus driving the price up for everyday Americans.DallasAg 94 said:I think you probably missed the point, which should surprise no one.Manhattan said:Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Cut off your nose to own the libs? Can someone please bump the original strategic release thread where everyone said it wouldn't make a dent in price?
The release temporarily lowers the price, but it will return to the price once you stop releasing it. OR... you have to keep releasing it.
Get back to me after the elections in Nov and Team Biden no longer needs to manipulate O&G supplies.
Going off past history as a predictor is smart.Manhattan said:Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Cut off your nose to own the libs? Can someone please bump the original strategic release thread where everyone said it wouldn't make a dent in price?
It wont effect the election...the people have already been hurting for so long it wont matter.DallasAg 94 said:
Absolutely Election tampering:
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/biden-admin-talks-with-energy-firms-it-seeks-balance-oil-prices-sources-2022-10-18/There is question about whether the 14M is part of the 180M... or in addition.Quote:
The sale would market the remaining 14 million barrels from Biden's previously announced, and largest ever, release from the reserve of 180 million barrels that started in May.Quote:
The administration has also spoken with oil companies about selling an additional 26 million barrels from a congressionally mandated sale in fiscal year 2023, which began Oct. 1, a fourth source said.
This is really like blowing out the Christmas budget bigger and better than you can afford. When the credit card bills start rolling in, everyone will pay.
Will have no effect, because plans are afoot to block the sun, you clearly missed that threadfrenchtoast said:
The sooner we get rid of this stupid oil, the sooner we can switch fully to electric and end hurricanes and fire.
rocky the dog said:
Yesterday said:
All this release and gas is still over $4 nationally and diesel is through the roof. Won't help a bit other than make us vulnerable if **** hits the fan.
Manhattan said:Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Cut off your nose to own the libs? Can someone please bump the original strategic release thread where everyone said it wouldn't make a dent in price?
Manhattan - you guys don't want our noses cutoff...... you want us all cutoff at the knees so we lay prostrate before your preferred Marxist overlords.Manhattan said:Eso si, Que es said:Problem is, most people just see the price at the pump, not the levers behind it getting pulled. I told my wife 12 months ago that I would pay $5 per gallon for next 18 months without complaint because it would sink Dems at midterms and they just use our strategic reserves to artificially suppress price and maintain power.doubledog said:
In the U.S., It is not the amount of crude on the market, it is the refining capacity.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/
Cut off your nose to own the libs? Can someone please bump the original strategic release thread where everyone said it wouldn't make a dent in price?
100%hunter2012 said:
Is there any doubt that this administration would release the entire reserve if it ensures their reelection?