Jeff Sachs speaking the truth about Nord stream

3,359 Views | 35 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by American Hardwood
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And the journalists lose control, become frustrated

Better video added

p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Post removed:
by user
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden pledges end to Nord Stream 2 if Russia invades Ukraine

Matt Hooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opinion =/ truth.

Just an opinion - probably wrong at that. Though admittedly this administration's level of stupid it's not an impossible opinion.

Edit - but unlikely. Also, Biden probably does not know what day of the week it is and whatever he says is compromised by his clear mental decline / dementia. He truly could rely on "I don't recall" as a defense for what happened at breakfast today.
Hooper Drives the Boat
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Both sides have very good motives for wanting to blow up Nord Stream, and both sides will drum up "conclusive" evidence against each other.

So we'll probably not know for awhile who actually did it, if we ever do find out.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sorry but how did they lose control? That was actually one of the better segments I've seen discussing a global news story in a while. And I usually think Robby is an annoying ****.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would not surprise me if the US did it. It would not surprise me if Russia did it. It would not surprise me if it was another interested 3rd party.

Currently I do not believe anyone in geopolitics
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunk Moreland said:

I'm sorry but how did they lose control? That was actually one of the better segments I've seen discussing a global news story in a while. And I usually think Robby is an annoying ****.


I've changed the original video to the full 8 minute interview and you can hear the frustration of the journalists with Sachs answers

Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does anyone think Pres. Poopypants has the guts to confront Putin in this manner? Maybe if Putin was a Republican, but not if he is just a genocidal fascist out to destroy an innocent people in the name of Great Russia.
p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ87 said:

Biden pledges end to Nord Stream 2 if Russia invades Ukraine


No one should take anything the half baked potato says as truth.


Don't let your hatred of the bumbling moron and his government of clowns cloud your judgement.
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have zero trust that there are any adults in charge in the White House.
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Future Presidential Debate

Democrat: "Well, your policies worsen global climate change and risk the lives of our future children."

Republican: "YOU STARTED A ****ING NUCLEAR WAR AND HALF OF THE UNITED STATES IS ****ING GONE! MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE DEAD!

Media Moderator: Uh, sir, sir! You're time has expired.

Democrat: "As I was saying….."
OverSeas AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol. An insurrection. Guessing he doesnt mean the Dems stuffing ballot boxes.

While he is right on instability, hard to take him seriously.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bulldog73 said:

Does anyone think Pres. Poopypants has the guts to confront Putin in this manner? Maybe if Putin was a Republican, but not if he is just a genocidal fascist out to destroy an innocent people in the name of Great Russia.


Didnt Biden did say that Putin needs to be taken out by any means necessary?

I mean, I'm not saying that isn't an incredibly stupid thing to say about another foreign leader, or that the puppet masters controlling him didn't retract it for him.

Between that and his statement about getting rid of the one China policy though, Biden has been one of the biggest war hawks by a president in maybe the past century.
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OverSeas AG said:

Lol. An insurrection. Guessing he doesnt mean the Dems stuffing ballot boxes.

While he is right on instability, hard to take him seriously.

Yeah, for someone telling us not to buy into the mainstream media narrative, he latched on to that one hook, line, and sinker.
James Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think its pretty obvious that the United States destroyed the nordstream. Is it not?
p_bubel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's obviously not obvious to most, but whatever. It's not like you'll need any real evidence to believe so anyway.
James Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Youll never see "evidence" (thats the way these things go). But who benefits?
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OverSeas AG said:

Lol. An insurrection. Guessing he doesnt mean the Dems stuffing ballot boxes.

While he is right on instability, hard to take him seriously.
Yep, lost me when he said we suffered through an insurrection and we still are.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ87 said:

And the journalists lose control, become frustrated

Better video added




That guy is so wrong…..what an arrogant POS.

If Russia sets off a Nuke then what is left of the Russian military will be decimated by NATO & US using cruise missiles using conventional warheads not nukes.
James Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FCBlitz said:

ABATTBQ87 said:

And the journalists lose control, become frustrated

Better video added




That guy is so wrong…..what an arrogant POS.

If Russia sets off a Nuke then what is left of the Russian military will be decimated by NATO & US using cruise missiles using conventional warheads not nukes.
The nuke arms build up in the Cold War is the deterrent to that. US has enough nukes to destroy Russia. Russia also has enough nukes to destroy US (and many NATO cities). This is why we shouldnt be messing around with a border dispute on the other side of the planet
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Light said:

FCBlitz said:

ABATTBQ87 said:

And the journalists lose control, become frustrated

Better video added




That guy is so wrong…..what an arrogant POS.

If Russia sets off a Nuke then what is left of the Russian military will be decimated by NATO & US using cruise missiles using conventional warheads not nukes.
The nuke arms build up in the Cold War is the deterrent to that. US has enough nukes to destroy Russia. Russia also has enough nukes to destroy US (and many NATO cities). This is why we shouldnt be messing around with a border dispute on the other side of the planet


Yeah, not allowing the Ukes to have nukes (rightly so) was sacrificing them to the nearest nuke power. Nukeless countries are easy pickins.
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The US did not blow up the pipe line. Do not have the guts to take such a move. Culprits are easily identifiable . Just think about who has access. Think it through.
tk111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man the "Bot" namecalling has me confused AF. I only got about halfway through a certain thread this morning before it got nuked...I can't even tell who folks are referring to...

Is someone calling C@lAg a bot? Or ABATTBQ87? Because if C@lAg is a bot, skynet is now.
Smeghead4761
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Houstonag said:

The US did not blow up the pipe line. Do not have the guts to take such a move. Culprits are easily identifiable . Just think about who has access. Think it through.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence."

"Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."

And yes, when it comes to proper maintenance, the Russians (and their Soviet forebears) are plenty incompetent.

Read this: https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/09/nordstream.html

And this: https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/10/nordstream-ii-electric-instapundit.html
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Excuse me if I don't take my international espionage news from an Ivy League economics professor.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
#botstuff
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tk111 said:

Man the "Bot" namecalling has me confused AF. I only got about halfway through a certain thread this morning before it got nuked...I can't even tell who folks are referring to...

Is someone calling C@lAg a bot? Or ABATTBQ87? Because if C@lAg is a bot, skynet is now.
Good morning Comrades!!!

I did live very close to Moscow for 7 years, so that must make me a Russian Bot

























Moscow, Tx that is!!
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Smeghead4761 said:

Houstonag said:

The US did not blow up the pipe line. Do not have the guts to take such a move. Culprits are easily identifiable . Just think about who has access. Think it through.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence."

"Sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."

And yes, when it comes to proper maintenance, the Russians (and their Soviet forebears) are plenty incompetent.

Read this: https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/09/nordstream.html

And this: https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/10/nordstream-ii-electric-instapundit.html
came here to post that, here is an additional tidbit

Quote:

Under certain circumstances of pressure, temperature, and water presence natural gas/methane will form solid hydrates, with concomitant amounts of fun.
For the Chinese definition of fun, anyway.
Keeping hydrates from forming is a constant battle, requiring vigilance, expertise, diligence, and constant water removal. If any of these things slack at any time you're getting hydrate formation.
The presence of solid hydrates in a pipeline can cause flow issues (causing cracks), destabilize the pipe itself (more cracks), and cause fires (bad. Very Bad), but the big issue (pun intended) is when you form enough hydrates that it blocks the pipe entirely (see: Hydrate plug, above).
A hydrate plug is one massive pain in the tuchkiss to remove, and removal of said hydrate plugs is not a task to be undertaken by idiots, rank amateurs, morons, the terminally unlucky, or stupid people.
Quote:

If the Gods blink, or Jobu has a particular case of the hips at you, what generally happens is the hydrate plug will still melt at the plug/wall junction, but when it does, the pressurised side will launch the plug (five feet in diametre, and the same density as water ice) at almost 200 miles an hour down the pipe towards the depressurised side.

When this plug bullet hits a bend in the pipe well, it doesn't stop, nor does it change direction easily. It's going to make a hole.
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Adverse Event
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blaming Poland? Or Baltic States?
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a p****
Hammerly High Dive Crips
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This guy is a left wing ******bag. I will not listen to anything he says. Might be a closed minded policy but I couldn't care less...the vast majority of the time, not listening to delusional white liberals has served me well.
Agnes Moffitt Rollin 60's - RIP Casper and Lil Ricky - FREE GOOFY AND LUCKY!
No Longer Subsribed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

All over the world, when I talk to people, they think the US did it. BTW, even reporters, on our papers that are involved say it [privately].
Absurdity. The man only speaks to libs who hate the US. This is pure speculation, not evidence. He even goes into the proverbial black helicopters. Nord Stream 1 and 2 are twin pipeline systems. If his theory is true, all four lines would be destroyed. But guess what, one still remains. And only one of the lines is needed to supply gas to Germany. So Russia still has the leverage to get what in wants in return for supplying gas. Russia destroyed the pipelines but lib dingleberrys have to create stories out of whole cloth to fit their narratives.
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Swedish investigative team finds 'detonations' damaged Nord Stream pipeline

An investigative team examining multiple explosions that rocked the Nord Stream pipeline network found Thursday that "detonations" damaged the lines as suspicions of sabotage remain high.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/swedish-investigative-team-finds-detonations-damaged-nord-stream-pipeline
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.