Power dissipation looks at the frequency, intensity, and duration of hurricanes and other tropical storms in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico. Its certainly trended up.

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Power dissipation looks at the frequency, intensity, and duration of hurricanes and other tropical storms in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico. Its certainly trended up.

---

I see a trend in the dotted blue line but where's the trend in the orange line?

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

---

let's be realistic what does the media not lie about anymore? it's all propaganda at this point i don't even know why we call them media anymore.

---

They are media. They aren't news or journalists though.

If people like this guy keep posting stats and data that shows a downward trend in hurricane activity and damage costs, the left media will use this as evidence that climate change is destroying hurricanes and putting our water sheds in danger of depletion.

It's such an easy play to make.

I need much scarier graphs to care. Plus dissipation sounds like weak ass factor compared to that huge flaming hot ball in the sky.

Here's the one I love on the bottom of my weather app…

Dont question the $cience!

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Power dissipation looks at the frequency, intensity, and duration of hurricanes and other tropical storms in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico. Its certainly trended up.

---

This is a bunch of horse shat

The Banned said:

---

tk111 said:

---

TXAggie2011 said:

---

Power dissipation looks at the frequency, intensity, and duration of hurricanes and other tropical storms in the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico. Its certainly trended up.

---

1. This is a comically short period of time.

2. You have any idea how much both the interest and advancement in storm tracking and measurement has evolved since 1950?

3. Indexes...you better have good reason to lump the variables together and a well explained accumulation that proves you aren't doing the #1 most common thing done with indexes - creating a biased term to explain a desired outcome.

---

This is my primary gripe. Just how well were we measuring these in the pre-satellite era? And how much more accurate are the readings with modern tech compared to that of 30-40 years ago?

---

And exactly which locations are these readings from? I would bet dollars to donuts there is no consistency in sites at which these temps are recorded.

BusterAg said:

---

I watched a documentary on Nolan Ryan this weekend.

It was showing that the technology gurus in the 70's were clocking Nolan Ryan's fastball at 100.9 mph.

40 years later, careful frame by frame analysis show that he was throwing the ball no slower than 107 mph on his fastest pitches, and probably a little over 108. That is a HUGE difference.

You will forgive me if I have some questions about time series data that compares data from the 1950's to the 2020's.

---

Nolan Ryan's fastball became 7-8% FASTER!!! He's so old and hasn't pitched in decades. No wonder our hurricanes are so strong now.

Did I do statistics good?

Golfo de Mexico sea temp is almost 83F or 28C?

Weren't we all supposed to die around 24C?

Please show me where the average water temperature is 83F
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/coastal-water-temperature-guide/egof.html
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/coastal-water-temperature-guide/wgof.html

The gulf was hot this year, we got really damned lucky all the other factors didn't line up.

Gulf has been hot other years, and spit hurricanes like ma deuce with a trigger happy jar head in charge.

All the weather data, which has only been tracked a short period of time, still misses things, and long range models are like political polls...... even the blind hog finds the acorn on occasion.

I still think El nino/la Nina cycles have a much greater effect, we just don't talk about those anymore cause it's not the hip thing. Hurricane activity has been cyclic like this for centuries though, even the Spaniards learned within 5-10 years when conditions where favorable/not.

The fastball didn't get faster. The measurement technology got more accurate.

BusterAg said:

---

The fastball didn't get faster. The measurement technology got more accurate.

---

bruhhh

Weather isn't driven by energy state.

Weather is driven by differentials and deltas. You need energy flow, entropy. If everything in a region is warmer, there may be smaller differences in that region and less flow from one state to another. There is less potential energy in the system locally because it has less opportunities for state change.

Check out Joe *******i - hurricane weather expert
Edit wow his name is actually censored- B a s t a r d i

He's gone private now and gets paid by corporations for actual real hurricane predictions etc.

He breaks these hurricane cycles down all the time. It's amazing the lies so called scientists get away with and the data is all there for anyone to look up.