Wants to legalize cannabis.
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Susan Hays for ag commissioner
2,746 Views |
41 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Tom Doniphon
one issue voters are tardshoosier-daddy said:
Wants to legalize cannabis.
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Where does she stand on everything else the office controls?
Weed should be legal, period.
Never, ever vote for a Democrat.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
gordo6 said:
Weed should be legal, period.
I agree, as should all drugs, but if it comes with other fiscally liberal bull****, no thanks.
She opposes chinamen buying our farmland. Which currently occurs under Miller. Several other states have banned this. But as a non tard I'm sure u knew this.
Never heard of her. But since I'm not a Marxist and the Democratic Party has been taken over by Marxists, I will never under any circumstance vote for a democrat Marxist.
gordo6 said:
Weed should be legal, period.
Isn't smoking pot and waiving dildos legal in Austin already?
She's a hemp farmer and a lawyer...ohhhhh, and a Dem.
Nope, I don't vote for morons.
Nope, I don't vote for morons.
Democrats should be banned. Period.gordo6 said:
Weed should be legal, period.
--
"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
"The Kingdom is for HE that can TAKE IT!" - Alexander
I guess people will vote for her on this issue alone as they get high while everything else she touches turns to crap for she is your typical Democrat.BigRobSA said:one issue voters are tardshoosier-daddy said:
Wants to legalize cannabis.
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Where does she stand on everything else the office controls?
And I am not going to vote for someone that actually believes that Trump colluded with the Russians.
This is from her webpage in the "Sid Sins".
Quote:
In keeping with his habitual misuse of state funds, last November Sid hired Carter Page who may very well have been collaborating with the Russians for the Trump campaign
www.hays4ag.com/sids-sins/
So Ag Commissioners get to decide if weed is legal in Texas? Interesting.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
EOT.
Hooper Drives the Boat
Most Democrats still believe in the Collusion Delusion.APHIS AG said:I guess people will vote for her on this issue alone as they get high while everything else she touches turns to crap for she is your typical Democrat.BigRobSA said:one issue voters are tardshoosier-daddy said:
Wants to legalize cannabis.
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Where does she stand on everything else the office controls?
And I am not going to vote for someone that actually believes that Trump colluded with the Russians.
This is from her webpage in the "Sid Sins".Quote:
In keeping with his habitual misuse of state funds, last November Sid hired Carter Page who may very well have been collaborating with the Russians for the Trump campaign
www.hays4ag.com/sids-sins/
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
hoosier-daddy said:
She opposes chinamen buying our farmland. Which currently occurs under Miller. Several other states have banned this. But as a non tard I'm sure u knew this.
How do you ban it?
hoosier-daddy said:
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/07/china-is-buying-billions-in-us-farmland-and-lawmakers-are-scrambling-to-try-to-stop-them/
That article says nothing about how you stop Chinese from owning land in this country. In fact, it basically says it is impossible to prevent.
"Both Iowa and Minnesota have already passed state laws, imposing restrictions on foreign ownership of farmland in their states."
hoosier-daddy said:
"Both Iowa and Minnesota have already passed state laws, imposing restrictions on foreign ownership of farmland in their states."
HOW
DO
YOU
DO
THAT?
And also some that are functionally Democrats. Some played out in August.Rapier108 said:Most Democrats still believe in the Collusion Delusion.APHIS AG said:I guess people will vote for her on this issue alone as they get high while everything else she touches turns to crap for she is your typical Democrat.BigRobSA said:one issue voters are tardshoosier-daddy said:
Wants to legalize cannabis.
Anybody crossing the line on Sid Miller?
Where does she stand on everything else the office controls?
And I am not going to vote for someone that actually believes that Trump colluded with the Russians.
This is from her webpage in the "Sid Sins".Quote:
In keeping with his habitual misuse of state funds, last November Sid hired Carter Page who may very well have been collaborating with the Russians for the Trump campaign
www.hays4ag.com/sids-sins/
C@LAg said:you pass a law and enforce it.Burdizzo said:hoosier-daddy said:
"Both Iowa and Minnesota have already passed state laws, imposing restrictions on foreign ownership of farmland in their states."
HOW
DO
YOU
DO
THAT?
Sort of like how we keep Iran from making nuclear weapons then. Sounds effective
nm. no point
C@LAg said:the difference is that ownership of land has to be registered with the state. if the state will not register the change in spite of the supposed sale, you do not own the land. most states do not give a crap, but they can enforce it if they chose to.,Burdizzo said:C@LAg said:you pass a law and enforce it.Burdizzo said:hoosier-daddy said:
"Both Iowa and Minnesota have already passed state laws, imposing restrictions on foreign ownership of farmland in their states."
HOW
DO
YOU
DO
THAT?
Sort of like how we keep Iran from making nuclear weapons then. Sounds effective
and there is no law on regards to Iran and nuclear weapons.
those are deals made by democrats to funnel monies to terrorist states so they can be used against the US.
I will go to the trouble to cut and paste part of the clickbait article since you are such a busy person....
Quote:
Efforts to stop foreign land purchases could come with several challenges.
Joe Maxwell, president of the progressive advocacy group Family Farm Action, told Politico that foreign investors could likely still set up limited liability companies (LLCs) in the U.S. and designate an American owner to circumvent reporting requirements while still owning the U.S. agricultural land through their corporate structure. Sifting through layered corporate structures could prove time-consuming and labor-intensive for regulatory agencies.
"It's a massive undertaking to verify who really owns [the land]," Maxwell told Politico. "These foreign interests are pretty smart. They use different business structures to further conceal it."
Again, how can the state tell someone they cannot own a piece of land?
That's an unfair comparison wherever one stands on this subject. International law is an illusion. If a great power willing to use force isn't in the game , it doesn't exist. Its a polite fiction.Burdizzo said:C@LAg said:you pass a law and enforce it.Burdizzo said:hoosier-daddy said:
"Both Iowa and Minnesota have already passed state laws, imposing restrictions on foreign ownership of farmland in their states."
HOW
DO
YOU
DO
THAT?
Sort of like how we keep Iran from making nuclear weapons then. Sounds effective
Internal law of states is supposed to be different. So is Federal ones. But these days....
C@LAg said:there is nothing that says they cannot.Burdizzo said:
Again, how can the state tell someone they cannot own a piece of land?
until one does and someone challenges it and a verdict is made one way or the other (or the feds pass a law), states conceptually have the right to do so.
as for how, that is up to the individual states to set limits and definitions and require proof before ownership is transferred.
I am sorry, sir. Your eyes are not round enough. Uncle Sam says you cannot own this land.
C@LAg said:not sure why you are getting so ****ing pissy about it.Burdizzo said:C@LAg said:there is nothing that says they cannot.Burdizzo said:
Again, how can the state tell someone they cannot own a piece of land?
until one does and someone challenges it and a verdict is made one way or the other (or the feds pass a law), states conceptually have the right to do so.
as for how, that is up to the individual states to set limits and definitions and require proof before ownership is transferred.
I am sorry, sir. Your eyes are not round enough. Uncle Sam says you cannot own this land.
states and the feds can put all sorts of limits on foreigners - higher college fees, driver's licenses, ability to get a gun, etc.
I am getting pissy because "pass a law" didn't really answer my question
Again, when has anyone ever had to ask permission from the state to buy land? The things you listed, with the exception of firearms, are all licenses, fees, and permits.
I can answer your question..... the answer is - YOU CANNOT DO IT.
Multiple layers of LPs, LLCs, and money will prevent it. But it sounds good, so some folks will cling to it.
Multiple layers of LPs, LLCs, and money will prevent it. But it sounds good, so some folks will cling to it.
Tom Doniphon said:
I can answer your question..... the answer is - YOU CANNOT DO IT.
Multiple layers of LPs, LLCs, and money will prevent it. But it sounds good, so some folks will cling to it.
That is the answer I expected. I was hoping it would come from one of the other contributors in this thread. Reality is the state and county offices don't really care who owns the land as long as the taxes continue to get paid.
And in this case, all she'd be able to do is use her bully pulpit to advocate for it. She'd have no power to change it.BigRobSA said:gordo6 said:
Weed should be legal, period.
I agree, as should all drugs, but if it comes with other fiscally liberal bull****, no thanks.
I'm convinced as long as Dan Patrick is Lt Gov, it will never happen.
What does the Ag Commissioner have to do with passing legislation?hoosier-daddy said:
Wants to legalize cannabis.
Featured Stories
See All
5:31
8h ago
1.8k
Wednesday sports discussions and the friendship forged
by Olin Buchanan
Belief in God helped Formby land at Texas A&M
by Olin Buchanan
LIVE from Davis: No. 15 Texas A&M vs. No. 11 Georgia (Thursday)
by Emily Dreger
tjack16
If you are AD for a day, how would you define baseball success?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
48
SVR44
If you are AD for a day, how would you define baseball success?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
27
nikator
Should Student Athletes be required to finish semester that their sports end in?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
27