Idaho's government offers "Porn Literacy," other corrupting practices to K-12 students - Idaho Freedom

Idaho’s government offers “porn literacy” to students, planned parenthood curriculum and advocates for abortion.

If this can happen in Idaho, it can happen anywhere. pic.twitter.com/e0mjPIB0vo

— Anna K. Miller (@annakate_miller) September 13, 2022

Quote:

---

Idaho's Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) implements sex education curriculum endorsed by Planned Parenthood in schools. The curriculum and training for sex education facilitators is purchased from an interest group that promotes queering education and normalizing the consumption of pornography.

Idaho law requires sex education taught in public schools to reinforce traditional family arrangements. IDHW promotes what Idaho law prohibits, however. IDHW takes funds from federal programs like the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and Title V Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE). Then, IDHW acquires sex education products from non-profits like Education, Training and Research (ETR), whose curriculum is developed and endorsed by Planned Parenthood.

Next, IDHW instructs public health districts to implement ETR's Reducing the Risk (RTR) curriculum in public schools.

ETR's Reducing the Risk curriculum promises to teach abstinence. Instead, ETR delivers a variety of approaches, including a "LGBTQ Inclusive" curriculum that queers education with an emphasis on "gender identity, sexual orientation and behavior." ETR also advocates for teaching elementary students about "porn literacy," which involves instruction on "kink and power, pleasure, sexual identity, sexual acts, and sexual exploration in relation to pornography."

For ETR, pornography consumption is a "required topic" in sex education. Though, as ETR admits, "the evidence is largely unclear whether sexually explicit media use influences future sexual health among adolescents." Introducing graphic sexual content into elementary schools creates opens minds and prepares students for sexual activity.

In an ETR-sponsored training titled "Porn Literacy in Sex Ed," Sarah Diamond, Associate Director of Prevention and Education at the University of San Diego, hopes sex educators avoid stigmatizing porn as bad but rather "help students reflect on their own values about pornography." Diamond suggests administering "porn literacy values" surveys and recommended activities wherein students defend ideas like "pornography can be a good way to learn about sex," even if they disagree.

Another sex education facilitator, Jess Melendez, Adolescent Programs Health Educator at San Ysidro Health Teen Clinic, asserts in a training video that porn literacy should start in elementary schools with "intimate safety conversations." In middle school, students should be able to "identify sexually explicit media and pornography." High schoolers should be schooled in finding out "how can porn that depicts racism be harmful to a viewer."

Other ETR-recommended "porn literacy" activities include having kids watch the AMAZE Org video "Porn: Fact or fiction" in which cartoon characters act out sexually explicit scenes. One young girl screams: "Wow! That's so big. I never knew it could be so huge!" The sexual innuendo is followed by cartoon characters performing sexual acts. Porn is normalized to middle schoolers so sexual activity will be normalized, since, as the video contends, "being curious about sex or looking at pictures or films of naked bodies or people engaging in sexual behaviors is perfectly normal."

In another ETR training video titled "Queering Sex Ed," Planned Parenthood representative Laura Gardner explains how curriculum like RTR can already be considered "LGBTQ inclusive." Important elements of "LGBTQ inclusive" sex ed include "adding a mention of a same sex relationship," "using the word partner," or "incorporating gender neutral names and language into scenarios and skits." Pregnancy lessons should include discussions on "adoption or Ivf surrogacy" or "adding intersex to an anatomy lesson or adding puberty blockers to a puberty lesson." For example, ETR's Reducing the Risk curriculum includes gender neutral names and language in role plays of sexual encounters.

ETR's radical curriculum spreads into Idaho schools through health districts. Idaho North Central Public Health District, for example, which serves Lewiston, Moscow, Orofino, Grangeville, and Kamiah, implements RTR in local schools.

A RTR curriculum link on the health district's website directs viewers and teachers to ETR's trainings on Porn Literacy and Queering Sex Ed.

The North Central Health District's website directs teens to several other resources endorsed by this government-financed interest group. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy link takes kids to Power to Decide, showing kids where to get an abortion. Another link provided by the district is Love is Respect, which introduces kids to topics like polyamory and gender transitions. The Sex etc. link takes students to articles such as Transgender Men Can Get Pregnant, Too, surveys about masturbation, and AMAZE Org videos featuring cartoon depictions of porn and abortion.

---

It's undeniable that the left is targeting our children, but heaven forbid you label the sick ****s as groomers.

I'm self taught

It's time to completely dismantle public education. Good experiment, but it has failed.

I couldn't even finish the video. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable is too dangerous to be allowed around children and is likely in need of serious counseling. Come, Lord Jesus, come.

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

I couldn't even finish the video. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable is too dangerous to be allowed around children and is likely in need of serious counseling. Come, Lord Jesus, come.

---

We don't need Jesus to come back. Our Lord blessed us with this life, country, planet. We need to do what we can to show appreciation and restore those things to a state that glorifies the Lord.

Well, I know tons of Cali's have moved to Idaho, so maybe that's where the influence comes from.

All the more reason to secure our western border at El Paso to Texline.

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

I couldn't even finish the video. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable is too dangerous to be allowed around children and is likely in need of serious counseling. Come, Lord Jesus, come.

---

fasthorse05 said:

---

Well, I know tons of Cali's have moved to Idaho, so maybe that's where the influence comes from.

All the more reason to secure our western border at El Paso to Texline.

---

Sorry, no. We need to secure the border to the north and east as well as the west.

Them Californians are sneaky suckers...they'll just drive around and enter down I-35. Plus, I don't like Oklahoma and Louisiana drivers. They are the worst.

Build the wall. Build it all the way around.

Sex was another form of Soma in A brave new world. It's advertised as a freedom, but it is another way to manipulate and control in the hands of the state.

In before the Alphabet Goalies write this off as irrelevant...

Why do they keep targeting children?!

Ohhhh, I wish I could say what I want......

Waffledynamics said:

---

Why do they keep targeting children?!

---

Why do you think they voted for Biden?

Waffledynamics said:

---

Why do they keep targeting children?!

---

They believe the children are the future. Teach them well and let them lead the way.

Show them all the gayness and gender dysphoria they possess inside. Give them a sense of pride, to make it easier. Let the children's cross-dressing remind us of how it soon could be.

**Get your kids out of public schools.**

They're waging psychological warfare on children in red states.

These people and everything they hold dear must be stamped out mercilessly.

Waffledynamics said:

---

Why do they keep targeting children?!

---

Because they are the weakest among us and children are our most valuable resource.

Why must the left destroy everything of value?
Because to gain the level of control the left wants,
they must destroy the foundation of our society.
Family, faith, freedom, safety, individualism... you name it, if it's good it has to go.
Once our country is in ruins, they can then rebuild it into their socialist utopia.

If you can't abort them...
then mutilate their body
or destroy their soul.
Anything to break their spirit
and control their minds.

It is a pendulum swing of an overreaction to conservative parents.

Do parents that cannot tolerate the fact that one of their children may be gay cause emotional harm to those kids, sure. Do parents that over stigmatize sex and genitals as something dirty and bad and wrong to their children cause harm and quite often a backlash from their children who overdue porn and sexuality as they grow older, as a consequence of a very sexually repressive upbringing, probably.

Instead of trying to have sensible policies that might help mitigate some of the negative effects and don't push political propaganda and agendas, they put radical leftist type people in leadership roles that come up with this stuff and demand radical type programs that push the envelope way beyond reasonable measures.

Texaggie7nine said:

---

It is a pendulum swing of an overreaction to conservative parents.

Do parents that cannot tolerate the fact that one of their children may be gay cause emotional harm to those kids, sure. Do parents that over stigmatize sex and genitals as something dirty and bad and wrong to their children cause harm and quite often a backlash from their children who overdue porn and sexuality as they grow older, as a consequence of a very sexually repressive upbringing, probably.

Instead of trying to have sensible policies that might help mitigate some of the negative effects and don't push political propaganda and agendas, they put radical leftist type people in leadership roles that come up with this stuff and demand radical type programs that push the envelope way beyond reasonable measures.

---

Lol what.

Texaggie7nine said:

---

It is a pendulum swing of an overreaction to conservative parents.

Do parents that cannot tolerate the fact that one of their children may be gay cause emotional harm to those kids, sure. Do parents that over stigmatize sex and genitals as something dirty and bad and wrong to their children cause harm and quite often a backlash from their children who overdue porn and sexuality as they grow older, as a consequence of a very sexually repressive upbringing, probably.

Instead of trying to have sensible policies that might help mitigate some of the negative effects and don't push political propaganda and agendas, they put radical leftist type people in leadership roles that come up with this stuff and demand radical type programs that push the envelope way beyond reasonable measures.

---

LOL

Do they mean it as in teens who don't have much sexual experience see porn, and part of the sex ed curriculum is teaching that porn is not reality, and all that rough sex stuff you see in porn is not cool to do unless the other person is completely on board and comfortable with it? Because if so that seems totally appropriate to teach to teenagers living in today's world.

Spotted Ag said:

---

A Net Full of Jello said:

---

I couldn't even finish the video. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable is too dangerous to be allowed around children and is likely in need of serious counseling. Come, Lord Jesus, come.

---

We don't need Jesus to come back. Our Lord blessed us with this life, country, planet. We need to do what we can to show appreciation and restore those things to a state that glorifies the Lord.

---

I'm pretty sure God would be cool with us arranging a face-to-face with Him and the folks promoting this crap.

Relax, it was just a funny and innocent picture, but I'll take it down.

When you finally accept that, at their roots, leftists are pushing exactly what Satan would want, the behavior of the left appears much more understandable and consistent. The left is the political face of people who are actively rebelling against God.

No. Not okay.

Nothing empowers young women more than watching a fat old Ron Jeremy plow a 20 year then backhand her when she does something wrong. Rofl.

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

Do they mean it as in teens who don't have much sexual experience see porn, and part of the sex ed curriculum is teaching that porn is not reality, and all that rough sex stuff you see in porn is not how it goes in real life and it's not cool to do that stuff unless the other person is completely on board and comfortable with it? Because if so that seems totally appropriate to teach to teenagers living in today's world.

---

No. No, it's not. School should be for learning how to read, write, compute, calculate, think critically and scientifically. It's not to learn about porn vs. reality nor is it for developing friendships between students and teachers. All these distractions are why American public education has gone to hell.

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

Do they mean it as in teens who don't have much sexual experience see porn, and part of the sex ed curriculum is teaching that porn is not reality, and all that rough sex stuff you see in porn is not how it goes in real life and it's not cool to do that stuff unless the other person is completely on board and comfortable with it? Because if so that seems totally appropriate to teach to teenagers living in today's world.

---

Just like sex education stopped unwedded pregnancies right?

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

Do they mean it as in teens who don't have much sexual experience see porn, and part of the sex ed curriculum is teaching that porn is not reality, and all that rough sex stuff you see in porn is not how it goes in real life and it's not cool to do that stuff unless the other person is completely on board and comfortable with it? Because if so that seems totally appropriate to teach to teenagers living in today's world.

---

The video was talking about subjecting cartoon porn on third graders. These teachers are probably getting sexually aroused by watching the children in their class as they illegally expose them to sexual images.

These people used to be locked away from society. Now they are trying to normalize pedophilia. They have no business being within 500 feet of a school much less being alone with children in a classroom.

Tom Kazansky 2012 said:

---

Actual Talking Thermos said:

---

Do they mean it as in teens who don't have much sexual experience see porn, and part of the sex ed curriculum is teaching that porn is not reality, and all that rough sex stuff you see in porn is not how it goes in real life and it's not cool to do that stuff unless the other person is completely on board and comfortable with it? Because if so that seems totally appropriate to teach to teenagers living in today's world.

---

Just like sex education stopped unwedded pregnancies right?

---

Unwedded? Apparently not. Teen pregnancy overall has plummeted.

After decades of "born that way" and "not hurting anyone" they are now deep into targeting and recruiting children so young they generally agree with whatever any adult tells them

In a revelation that should surprise no one, it turns out Idaho is not teaching porn literacy to children.

The curriculum stresses abstinence and use of contraceptives as an approach to sex ed and does not at any point talk about porn literacy. It also does not include any specific LGBTQ+ sex education. It is for students aged 14-18.


The group does offer a class for adult that include porn literacy. It's geared towards teachers, admin, and parents to help them know how to address questions about porn they may receive from kids.


https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/local/208/addressing-iffs-claims-porn-literacy-idahos-sex-education-curriculum/277-06663703-a2d8-4545-89c2-68cf40d79cfe

https://www.inlander.com/spokane/no-idaho-schools-are-not-teaching-porn-literacy/Content?oid=24569006