Quote:

---

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an independent, special master to review the records.

Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president's team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documentsall seen on the final page of the FBI's property receipt contained information covered by attorney-client privilege.

The FBI seized classified records from Trump's Palm Beach home during its unprecedented Monday morning raid, including some marked as top secret. But the former president is disputing the classification, saying the records have been declassified.

The warrant and property receipt from the FBI's Monday search were formally unsealed Friday afternoon.

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-seizes-privileged-trump-records-during-raid-doj-opposes-request-independent-review-sources

This is what they were really after. Watch the courts allow it to be used for a show trial.

Banana Republic

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

Man how often can you be wrong?

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

You're 100% wrong as always.

Ex-Presidents still do have executive privilege. Plenty of court decisions have backed this up.

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

Russian bot

Rapier108 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

You're 100% wrong as always.

Ex-Presidents still do have executive privileged. Plenty of court decisions have backed this up.

---

Even if you were right it could be done with an executive order, but you are wrong so it isn't even necessary.

Manhattan said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

You're 100% wrong as always.

Ex-Presidents still do have executive privileged. Plenty of court decisions have backed this up.

---

Even if you were right it could be done with an executive order, but you are wrong so it isn't even necessary.

---

What?

No surprise there.

DOJ has arrested, targeted, stolen devices from all of the lawyers..........




except the one who has committed treason repeatedly, Marc Elias.

Try this educating link. Pay special attention attention to Obamas EO 13489.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/executive-privilege-101/

Rockdoc said:

---

Man how often can you be wrong?

---

So far 827 times in a month and a half.

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

Can you quit talking out of your ass?

"Even if it's true it's not true because Share Blue said to say so!"

Never let facts get in the way of shilling for the DNC and their banana republik Gestapo tactics

BusterAg said:

---

Try this educating link. Pay special attention attention to Obamas EO 13489.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/executive-privilege-101/

---

Even your link says "in the national archives". These weren't… and if they were it could be undone with an eo..

Did you not even read your own link?

Manhattan said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Try this educating link. Pay special attention attention to Obamas EO 13489.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/executive-privilege-101/

---

Even your link says "in the national archives". These weren't… and if they were it could be undone with an eo..

---

I know Share Blue told you to avoid this but attorney client privilege applies to everyone all the time

And attorney client privilege doesn't exist when you are planning or covering up a crime.

Manhattan said:

---

And attorney client privilege doesn't exist when you are planning or covering up a crime.

---

Yes Komrade! Show me man and I show you crime!

Manhattan said:

---

Moving the goalposts in 1 minute, that was fast.

---

Prove me wrong and explain what crime has happened that invalidates A/C privilege

I dare you

Manhattan said:

---

And attorney client privilege doesn't exist when you are planning or covering up a crime.

---

You are still incorrect.

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

Like I said earlier today, prepare yourself for another epic letdown (then another name change).

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!" And SCOTUS case law absolutely backs up Trump on this one

But nice try

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

The documents the FBI could have come and got wherever they wanted and the ones who the DOJ approved to be stored after being inspected earlier this year.

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!"

But nice try

---

Even if you are correct, if the former president or his lawyer says they returned them and they didn't, that is a crime.

But you are incorrect so it's a crime covering up a crime.

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!"

But nice try

---

Even if you are correct, if the former president or his lawyer says they returned them and they didn't, that is a crime.

But you are incorrect so it's a crime covering up a crime.

---

What crime?

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!"

But nice try

---

Even if you are correct, if the former president or his lawyer says they returned them and they didn't, that is a crime.

But you are incorrect so it's a crime covering up a crime.

---

You're even running out of BS. Hilarious

Manhattan said:

---

Aggie4Life02 said:

---

Banana Republic

---

Holding the government accountable is the opposite.

Trump doesn't have executive privilege anymore.

---

Your knowledge on executive privilege seems to be about as poor as your knowledge on the classification processes and authorities.

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!"

But nice try

---

Even if you are correct, if the former president or his lawyer says they returned them and they didn't, that is a crime.

But you are incorrect so it's a crime covering up a crime.

---

Sorry Share Blue, the FBI has no jurisdiction over his documents. It's up to the office of the former presidents and the archives to work out what stays and what goes to the archive because NARA has no inherent right to the records either

The corrupt FBI used fake information to imply he had something dangerous like nuclear secrets to get themselves involved and seize all these records

Stop being a goalie for fascism

Manhattan said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Try this educating link. Pay special attention attention to Obamas EO 13489.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/executive-privilege-101/

---

Even your link says "in the national archives". These weren't… and if they were it could be undone with an eo..

Did you not even read your own link?

---

You said Trump doesn't have executive privileges. You were incorrect. He absolutely does as a former president. My link proves it. Look up eo 13489 for more information.

Mar a LaRgo isn't the national archives.

Manhattan said:

---

Mar a LaRgo isn't the national archives.

---

SCIF….

Manhattan said:

---

Mar a LaRgo isn't the national archives.

---

Wow you actually said something true

But it's a former presidents office (SCIF) where they are allowed to keep records from their presidency

Do you not know anything about this?

No you clearly don't

The EO covers information stored by the national archives…. And again IF you were right, Biden could undo it with the stroke of a pen.

Manhattan said:

---

And attorney client privilege doesn't exist when you are planning or covering up a crime.

---

It doesn't exist on any future planned crimes. It absolutely does exist on all past alleged crimes. There would be no point in hiring a lawyer if you couldn't be honest with him about your guilt. If you admit to your attorney you committed a past crime, privilege still exists. If you tell your lawyer you are going to kill someone or lie under Oath, it does not exist.

If the alleged crime was lying to the Feds, that happened before the raid. Documents related to that alleged crime that were privileged should still be privileged.

Manhattan said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Manhattan said:

---

Lying to the FBI about returning documents.

---

Oh my God, you truly are just parroting Share Blue!

Trump used his privilege to declassify all these documents. Neither the FBI or Archives gets to say "nuh uh! You have to give them back because they used to be classified!"

But nice try

---

Even if you are correct, if the former president or his lawyer says they returned them and they didn't, that is a crime.

But you are incorrect so it's a crime covering up a crime.

---

Meanwhile hunter Biden and Gcf walk freely among Us