Post-Raid talking points are out

7,580 Views | 72 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by milner79
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Call me when someone gets arrested outside of Garland's house with a plan to assassinate him
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See, I tried to warn folks that this was just bait.
TheTruthsLastHope
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Does it matter if there is any credibility to any of these articles and claims? Or is it you simply have made you determination of guilt/innocence without actually seeing anything? Having a preconceived absolute of what happen for either side shows no matter what info comes out you've concluded in your head you're right regardless of the actual facts.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDUB08AG said:

Call me when someone gets arrested outside of Garland's house with a plan to assassinate him


Wont even take that much, I am guessing some Facebook posts about this will lead to arrests and national headlines. This is (D)ifferent
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheTruthsLastHope said:

Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Does it matter if there is any credibility to any of these articles and claims? Or is it you simply have made you determination of guilt/innocence without actually seeing anything? Having a preconceived absolute of what happen for either side shows no matter what info comes out you've concluded in your head you're right regardless of the actual facts.


FBI and "credibility"

L-O-****ing-L
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Umm, if you read this board alone, these aren't just talking points. There are a lot of pissed off people, and for a damned good reason.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Top news story on Fox News Radio this morning was "threats" against DOJ, FBI, and the AG.

People posting crap online are not the threat; they're just venting.

It is the one person who doesn't say a word who is the real threat because no one has a clue what that person is planning, but it doesn't create headlines or give the communists a talking point.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheTruthsLastHope said:

Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Does it matter if there is any credibility to any of these articles and claims? Or is it you simply have made you determination of guilt/innocence without actually seeing anything? Having a preconceived absolute of what happen for either side shows no matter what info comes out you've concluded in your head you're right regardless of the actual facts.


Facts don't matter, it's the severity of the accusation, right?
I Sold DeSantis Lifts
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump saying documents were planted. That's a post raid talking point and will soon be endemic here
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some folk are calling for WAR. Civil WAR 2.0.
D-Fens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
100%. The only thing that can save the dems from an air tight criminal case on Biden crime family is a Mar Lago Raid insurrection before the midterms.

If we don't see something before Oct, you are going to have libs out in the street holding tiki torches with MAGA hats and shirts that say "white nationalist".
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
False flag incoming.
Cepe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also "what about" ism when they go after hunter and Biden after the fall losses.
D-Fens
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cepe said:

Also "what about" ism when they go after hunter and Biden after the fall losses.


Exactly. They have a treasure chest full of GOP soundbites claiming "weaponization" and "political retribution".....that will be leveraged to deligitimize the legitimate criminal investigations incoming.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

See, I tried to warn folks that this was just bait.
Everything is bait in the childish realm of liberal politics.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CM Trump Voter said:

Trump saying documents were planted. That's a post raid talking point and will soon be endemic here
What should he say?
Houstonag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An abuse of power pretext to hurt Trump and conservative who support him. How can a single person, this magistrate judge, make a decision by himself that this RAID is necessary as opposed to a subpoena? They shopped around for the right judge. My point no single judge should have this kind of power.

The JD and FBI do not count for they are part of the swamp, deep state, DC insiders who want the taxpayers to keep paying for their jobs and lavish benefits.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?

NM
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

See, I tried to warn folks that this was just bait.
There wasn't significant violence yet and it doesn't matter. If a protester cusses it will be considered violence by the media. Since the media is going to do the same thing no mater the scale of the "violence" they should not be a factor in deciding the right way to respond to this egregious gestapo tactic.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CM Trump Voter said:

Trump saying documents were planted. That's a post raid talking point and will soon be endemic here

Why not? You think dems are not capable of doing that? Their honesty is no longer in question. We know the answer.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheTruthsLastHope said:

Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Does it matter if there is any credibility to any of these articles and claims? Or is it you simply have made you determination of guilt/innocence without actually seeing anything? Having a preconceived absolute of what happen for either side shows no matter what info comes out you've concluded in your head you're right regardless of the actual facts.
Are you just doing a "copy-paste" of this concept for every raid thread, sock boy?
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh nooooo....the "far-right" doesn't like when the FBI acts like the Gestapo or the Stasi. What a bunch of white supremecist domestic terrorists!

dunlay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Artoria said:

Or, alternatively:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"
--- "People expressing opinions of resistance against government agency abuse"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI
--- "Heads of rouge agencies concerned subjects will not comply willingly with their demands, and may react."

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid
---- "Chinese collaborator/spy tool is displeased with reaction from government subjects over federal oppressive actions"


Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.
[Guessing you are right -- this is out of the handbook for 3rd world dictators]
"Democracy: 2 wolves and 1 sheep deciding one what to have for supper. Liberty: 2 wolves set on supper, and finding 1 well armed sheep."
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheTruthsLastHope said:

Artorias said:

"Conservatives threatening violence after raid!"

Headline on Fox is about "security concerns" for Garland and FBI

Swallowswell is claiming conservatives are "fomenting violence" and "chaos" after the raid

Guessing this was part of the raid plan all along.


Does it matter if there is any credibility to any of these articles and claims? Or is it you simply have made you determination of guilt/innocence without actually seeing anything? Having a preconceived absolute of what happen for either side shows no matter what info comes out you've concluded in your head you're right regardless of the actual facts.
How's the investigation into Hunters laptop going? What have you concluded?

Should we trust the FBI right now?
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Republicans Pounce"
BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this doesn't get the GOP base motivated and frothing at the mouth for the midterms, I don't know what will.
Nobody cares. Work Harder
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty sad we now have exactly 3 kinds of americans;

1 Americans
2 People working for international financial elites pushing woke communist brainwashing on the world
3 Useful idiots that believe any of that bull**** and vote and acquiesce accordingly

Here's a hint-if you have an fbi badge, or you believe anything you see on the news, you are not in category 1.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Violent Leftist protesters get let go, without bail.

Violent conservative protesters will spend months in prison.

It's a simple bias to see.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

Violent Leftist protesters get let go, without bail.

Violent conservative protesters will spend months in prison.

It's a simple bias to see.
Don't even need to be violent. Just make sure you don't go inside a federal building and take pictures!
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
black_ice said:

Some folk are calling for WAR. Civil WAR 2.0.
Take your insurrection claims elsewhere, nitwit.

Or are you our resident eff-bee-eye informant?

Just flew down from Michigan, snowbird?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
TexAgs91 said:

nortex97 said:

See, I tried to warn folks that this was just bait.
There wasn't significant violence yet and it doesn't matter. If a protester cusses it will be considered violence by the media. Since the media is going to do the same thing no mater the scale of the "violence" they should not be a factor in deciding the right way to respond to this egregious gestapo tactic.
THIS.

Mike Huckabee, a rather laid back guy as politicians go and no radical, said this: "There's "a systemic, methodical, highly orchestrated attempt to shut half the country completely out."

When you do that, maybe you should expect a big clash, and have worked to rate it.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i saw stuff being posted on line yesterday and knew right away this would be the medias talking points, be vigilant, false flag events could occur
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pookers said:

False flag incoming.


poop slap bet that before mid terms a major one occurs. they do not want this vote to happen. it's going to get really bumpy over the next 3 months.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.