Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This. Trump wasn't Sandy Berger smuggling out classified documents in his socks.FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
A simple subpoena would have sufficed. If Trump ignored or refused to cooperate with the subpoena, then you have probable cause for a search warrant and/or a show cause hearing.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
And during the transition, everything is documented of what is turned over to the archives and what remains with the President. It's a process and one that usually doesn't directly involve the President himself.FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
Yeah. Why a no-notice warrant? For some sentimental notes and letters Trump took with him? Seems to be overkill.aggiehawg said:A simple subpoena would have sufficed. If Trump ignored or refused to cooperate with the subpoena, then you have probable cause for a search warrant and/or a show cause hearing.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Because your party is corrupt. They wanted their photo op.GeorgiAg said:Yeah. Why a no-notice warrant? For some sentimental notes and letters Trump took with him? Seems to be overkill.aggiehawg said:A simple subpoena would have sufficed. If Trump ignored or refused to cooperate with the subpoena, then you have probable cause for a search warrant and/or a show cause hearing.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Yes. Not to mention the subpoena would become a public story if refused, and further assist any FBI stance about it. Instead, it looks like what it is--- total corruption probably geared toward CYA of guilt in the Obiden govt.aggiehawg said:A simple subpoena would have sufficed. If Trump ignored or refused to cooperate with the subpoena, then you have probable cause for a search warrant and/or a show cause hearing.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
So, you think Trump claiming ignorance is the way to go?FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
Oh you got him for sure this time. This time it's really really legit and a serious crime. Do you ever look back and examine the things that you fell for in the past?Watermelon Man said:So, you think Trump claiming ignorance is the way to go?FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
While this theory certainly has plausibility on its side, it falls a bit short on relevancy.
The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
It is under seal. Trump cannot release it.Quote:
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
Watermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
We'll file this under "If Trump didn't do anything wrong, the Democrats wouldn't be investigating him"Watermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
Completely false information given that, as mentioned on this thread and others, the warrant is under seal.Watermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
etxag02 said:FriscoKid said:Trump didn't even pack those boxes. They were probably packed by staffers and I doubt he even knows what is in them.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
This whole thing continues to be corrupt to the highest levels of our "government".
What difference does it make?
We have video evidence ofHillary configuring the email serverTrump packing the boxes.
Team response:
Laws don't matter.
Where is the source saying its under seal?fka ftc said:Completely false information given that, as mentioned on this thread and others, the warrant is under seal.Watermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
To add, I still fund this username offensive.
The pointWatermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
Sealed search warrant here signed by Bruce E Reinhart, magistrate judge for the Southern District of Florida https://t.co/Vl1FkjjMt8
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) August 9, 2022
https://nypost.com/2022/08/09/judge-who-approved-fbi-raid-on-mar-a-lago-once-linked-to-jeffrey-epstein/boboguitar said:Where is the source saying its under seal?fka ftc said:Completely false information given that, as mentioned on this thread and others, the warrant is under seal.Watermelon Man said:The search warrant will clearly and explicitly describe what they were looking for, how it was evidence of which specific crimes had been committed, why seizure at the time was necessary, and supporting evidence of the crimes and why they believed Mar-A-Lago contained the evidence they needed to prosecute said crimes.fixer said:Watermelon Man said:Who is making that claim? The DOJ isn't saying anything, so it must be coming from Trump.fixer said:
The claim is the 15 boxes has national security sensitive information contained in it.
If actually true they'd have it and not need a warrant 18 months after he left office.
Probably half dozen or more news stories are indicating this clearly and in plain English.
If Trump wanted us to know what the warrant says, he would release it, not simply hearsay from his son about what it says.
To add, I still fund this username offensive.
Not so fast my friend...Martin Cash said:
Are -- How partisan ARE the National Archives -
They're the guys who let Sandy Burglar walk out with classified documents with no consequences.
