I know F16 will love this. Only 6 years, guys.

A new study by Stanford shows it'll take $62 trillion for the whole world to go renewable, which will earn $11 trillion annually to pay for itself within 6 years! That's also adding 28 million more jobs than the current fossil fuel industry has!

Source: https://t.co/p0KYW6029K

— Matt Ferrell (@UndecidedMF) July 28, 2022

Did they factor in Unicorn farts?

you voted for this

Who paid for the study?

Today on "tell me you're a Keynesian nitwit without telling me..."

One person to cut down trees for firewood and one person to follow and plant new trees. Twice the jobs!

BuddysBud said:

---

Who paid for the study?

---

Solyndra.

About the study author : Mark Z. Jacobson is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University. His work forms the scientific bases for the U.S. Green New Deal.

We all have to wear this.

BuddysBud said:

---

Who paid for the study?

---

The study paid for itself.

so by this idiot's plan, we are going to take the world's total population, which most are below the poverty line, and transiton them and their lifestyle/economy to clean energy in 13 years.....

ok....

These people are delusional, literally delusional.

So if we build wind mills and solar panels for our backyards, we will all be rich !

if this govt were involved you would have to add at least one to two 0's at the end of the number.

DallasAg 94 said:

---

Because the theoretical efficiency will be achieved and there is no on-going costs for maintenance.

So, it would take 6 years to recapture ROI for initial costs. Now do Operational Cost, Depreciation, Energy Loss in Transmission.

These people are NOT smart.

---

Also - energy isn't valuable because it's energy - it's valuable because it's an input to producing goods. "More jobs creating energy" just means "more expenses to pass on to producers of goods."

Take - for example - atmospheric oxygen. No headcount is currently employed for the general livability of people. It's insane to say that a Mars colony will be MORE productive because their economy will require more jobs in terraforming!

Why are we doing all this stuff when we could just build a **** load of nuclear reactors? They're cleaner, safer, and more efficient than every other energy source out there.

BuddysBud said:

---

Who paid for the study?

---

We closed tax loopholes on billionaires and corporations.

How do these people keep getting paid to peddle this crap when their ideas keep getting proven false? Germany has spent trillions of Euros on renewables sufficient to provide 200% of their needs yet those "solutions" are providing about 10%. Why? Well it turns out Germany isn't windy or sunny enough for this **** to work. Now the Russians are cutting them off and it's lead to panic buying of wood and wood burning stoves.

We have similar issues here. Something like 80% of Americans don't live close enough to areas where there's sufficient wind or solar energy to make it work.

Why do we keep giving these people a microphone?

Kamala needs to send them a fruit basket or something to thank them for spewing dumber filth than she does.

GeorgiAg said:

---

BuddysBud said:

---

Who paid for the study?

---

The study paid for itself.

---

After 6 months.

Germany also decided to delay shutting down their remaining nuclear plants recently. It was the smartest energy move they've made in decades.

Source: his butthole burping.

We used to consider that comedy, by lower-than-tards like Jim Carrey. Now it's policy. Thanks to the Science (tm).

All we need to control the climate is more money. More investment. Give it to us, and you will be free...Honest. Pinky Promise...

-Every person making 180K a year who is worth triple digit millions. The entire thing is a scam. Wake the **** up.

Liars.

LOYAL AG said:

---

How do these people keep getting paid to peddle this crap when their ideas keep getting proven false? Germany has spent trillions of Euros on renewables sufficient to provide 200% of their needs yet those "solutions" are providing about 10%. Why? Well it turns out Germany isn't windy or sunny enough for this **** to work. Now the Russians are cutting them off and it's lead to panic buying of wood and wood burning stoves.

We have similar issues here. Something like 80% of Americans don't live close enough to areas where there's sufficient wind or solar energy to make it work.

Why do we keep giving these people a microphone?

---

Because bureaucrats and politicians benefit from the grift, so they keep funneling your tax dollars (and indebting future generations) to these buffoons...

which country do we strip mine away for all the materials for this?

On a separate note, the twitter user who posted that has a lot of good videos about new technologies and advancements in energy. Everything from new battery chemistry, to compact nuclear generators, hydro; very interesting channel.

https://odysee.com/@undecidedmf:a

I can't trust anything said by folks who are so intellectually dishonest that they can't define a women, believe men can menstruate and have babies and pushed the Covid virus origin lies of the CCP / NIH.

Liberal's math. Just like spending more money will decrease inflation. So what do we do at night? What a joke.

Ah yes, the old "creating jobs" inanity. Let's just pay every American $500,000 per year to tear pieces of paper into tiny bits by hand. Everyone will be employed, and everyone will be rich!!!

I have 2 dogs that fart a few times a week... they may have not included them in the study

renewable energy like ethanol.. lets use 2 gallons of gasoline to make 1 gallon of ****ty ethanol.. DUMB

DallasAg 94 said:

---

Because the theoretical efficiency will be achieved and there is no on-going costs for maintenance.

So, it would take 6 years to recapture ROI for initial costs. Now do Operational Cost, Depreciation, Energy Loss in Transmission.

These people are NOT smart.

---

It's a religion for them and some of our would-be "best and brightest" have become zealots, blinded by their undying faith.