Dems intro bill to term limit Supreme Court justices

4,944 Views | 49 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Moon Shadow
Post removed:
by user
Post removed:
by user
Bigballin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They need to start with the legislative branch first
Hungry Ojos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The bill's sponsors reads like a "who's who" of ****ing idiots.
IndividualFreedom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How pathetic.
The Last Cobra Commander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:






Exactly. They tried this shiz a couple of years back. DOA….
The leftist is driven by something other than facts and can’t be cured.

Swimming with dolphins whispering imaginary numbers looking for the fourth dimension…
Ag_of_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They're actually introducing something that's needed? Hell froze over...

*edit nevermind. Trrm limits for them are good, this system is stupid.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hungry Ojos said:

The bill's sponsors reads like a "who's who" of ****ing idiots.


Not surprising the Guam-tip-over imbecile and these other half-wits signed onto such an idiotic DOA bill
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately that requires a constitutional amendment.
DrEvazanPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

Unfortunately that requires a constitutional amendment.


What is this…."constitution" that you speak of?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not going to happen. They would need to amend Article III Section 1.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Not going to happen. They would need to amend Article III Section 1.
They'll just have Nancy rip it in half....that'll work!
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baaaahwaaaah!!
Post removed:
by user
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SCOTUS declares this law unconstitutional

SCOTUS 1

Libiot: 0
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) introduced the bill, along with Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Karen Bass (D-Calif.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) as co-sponsors.

Tells you all you need to know. It's like a Who's Who list of congressional idiots.

Post removed:
by user
Clob94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny how these turd stains want to term limit judges, but not themselves.


It's about time for some old school French style "off with they heads".
IslanderAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congress first.
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Make it 30 years with current judges grandfathered in and I'm good with it.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

I do wonder how the SC judges would react to this. publicly.

also convenient first two to go are Republican judges. Funny how that works.


Sorry, I didn't understand how they were going to start it. Is it just by seniority?
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, here we have today's reminder that liberals are not serious people. I really do think we could do this every day and never run out of material.
BTKAG97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems really are that stupid.

Yup, all they need to do to change the Constitution is pass a bill.

How long will it take the Courts to rule it unconstitutional?
Post removed:
by user
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good, the Supreme court makes up law from the bench. They need to be neutered. And congress / Senate need to be reminded what the 10th amendment is. In general the feds need to take a hair cut.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bigballin said:

They need to start with the legislative branch first
Hell yes. Add a rider that it applies to the House and Senate and go ahead.
waitwhat?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there any explanation for how term limits for SCOTUS would change anything? Would a justice's ruling be different if they had to leave office early?
" 'People that read with pictures think that it's simply about a mask' - Dana Loesch" - Ban Cow Gas

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Dr. Ron Paul

Big Tech IS the empire of lies

TEXIT
jickyjack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3575349-democrats-introduce-bill-to-enact-term-limits-for-supreme-court-justices/

A group of House Democrats introduced a bill on Tuesday to enact term limits for Supreme Court justices, arguing that the move will "restore legitimacy and independence to the nation's highest court."

The legislation, titled the Supreme Court Tenure Establishment and Retirement Modernization (TERM) Act, would authorize the president to nominate Supreme Court justices every two years in the first and third years after a presidential election. The justices who have been on the court the longest will be moved to senior status first.

If confirmed by the Senate, those individuals would serve a maximum 18 years on the bench. After their tenure is complete, the Supreme Court justices would retire from active service and assume senior status.

Justices on the bench at the time of the bill's enactment would switch to senior status one-by-one as justices are confirmed to the bench in the first and third years after a presidential election.

Under senior status, justices will still hold their office on the Supreme Court, which includes official duties and pay. If the number of justices dips below nine at some point because of a vacancy, disability or disqualification the justice who most recently attained senior status would serve as the ninth associate justice.

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) introduced the bill, along with Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Karen Bass (D-Calif.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) as co-sponsors.

Lumpy Nadler and Sheila Jackson Lee heading up an all-star cast.
Central Committee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Term limit Congress first.
We may not always get what we want. We may not always get what we need. Just so we don't get what we deserve.
agAngeldad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now do Term limits for congress amd senate!!!
peace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
age limits would be a good thing to add to the term limits. of they take this course of action.
Ag83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.)

This guy just needs to stay focused on Guam tipping over.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) introduced the bill, along with Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Karen Bass (D-Calif.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) as co-sponsors.

Tells you all you need to know. It's like a Who's Who list of congressional idiots.
Just the fact these pathetic, unethical, amoral idiots introduced this bill exposes they have not read the Constitution, let alone believe in he Constitution. Somewhere at some time weren't these miscreants obligated to swear an oath of office to uphold the Constitution?

Anyone considering voting for any Democratic candidate should reconsider their voting preferences.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cry more Dems.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.