**** off red! Go back to getting ****ed by your new wife.
"prince" Harry criticizes USA at the UN
6,393 Views |
68 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Bobaloo
Him and his wife are just another reason to build the wall already
He is such a *****.
Who?
Is that real?
" 'People that read with pictures think that it's simply about a mask' - Dana Loesch" - Ban Cow Gas
"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Dr. Ron Paul
Big Tech IS the empire of lies
TEXIT
"Truth is treason in the empire of lies." - Dr. Ron Paul
Big Tech IS the empire of lies
TEXIT
These guys all use the same exact language and words for everything. They are just weaponizing language for total control.
Come try to rule the US again
Faaaaaak off Harry
Ginger.
Go piss off your kaiser parents
We good babe
Go piss off your kaiser parents
We good babe
2024
The Orangeman Returns with Thunder
The Orangeman Returns with Thunder
Another example of an communist education.
Marvin J. Schiller
Quote:
At the United Nations, Prince Harry calls out "the rolling back of Constitutional rights in the United States" as part of "a global assault on democracy and freedom."
The vaccine mandates? He's right.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Fight! Fight! Fight!
So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.
How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.
How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan
Harry is trying to over compensate for his life of privilege and build an image as a revolutionary. Just like Colin Kap is trying to over compensate for being raised in suburbs by white folk, to build a BLM brand.
It's the same exact dynamics at work with a female love interest igniting it in both cases.
In other words they are poozy whipped beta beaches.
It's the same exact dynamics at work with a female love interest igniting it in both cases.
In other words they are poozy whipped beta beaches.
Feck off Hairy....and his boyfriend
Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?aggie93 said:
So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.
How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.
jwoodmd said:Then why this thread and all the comments about "don't care" when it seems everyone does!?aggie93 said:
So dude is born literally into English royalty and lives the elitist of an elite existence. He then decides that isn't good enough and moves to the US because presumably he thinks the US is much better than being a Prince in England. Then he proceeds to go in front of the UN inside the US and berate and criticize it.
How anyone cares in the slightest about this spoiled little **** I have no idea. What an incredibly insecure attention *****.
Oh look another beta f***
It was actually less than a year ago according to the date on the cover.
F'n limey ******* needs to stay in his bloody lane.
Not that politically relevant, but funny nonetheless.
Emasculated wuss.
Never seen a guy p whipped so quickly in my life
Never seen a guy p whipped so quickly in my life
To a leftist: The Constitution is a huge blanket covering whatever they feel shouldn't be allowed or should be guaranteed in the USA.
To the right: The Constitution is a finite list of things the government is required to do and cannot do.
The left will throw anything it can against "the constitution" (as they see it) to see if it will stick. With a bit of luck and a Supreme Court full of progressives there's a lot that could.
Luckily, the current Supreme Court has called out the BS of the "living document" and actually done the right thing and reset some precedents on rulings that shouldn't have been.
To the right: The Constitution is a finite list of things the government is required to do and cannot do.
The left will throw anything it can against "the constitution" (as they see it) to see if it will stick. With a bit of luck and a Supreme Court full of progressives there's a lot that could.
Luckily, the current Supreme Court has called out the BS of the "living document" and actually done the right thing and reset some precedents on rulings that shouldn't have been.
Hey Red, remember 1776? Go fetch the tea out of the harbor.
Sorry Harry
SCOTUS ruled (correctly) that there IS no constitutional right to an abortion and never was. Try putting down the crack pipe and keep up with the rest of the class
SCOTUS ruled (correctly) that there IS no constitutional right to an abortion and never was. Try putting down the crack pipe and keep up with the rest of the class
The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.
He's just upset that the new normal won't let him party like he used to.
EAD Red
. Is this Orwellian for, "I want to be a dictator?"Quote:
"the rolling back of Constitutional rights in the United States" as part of "a global assault on democracy and freedom."
Jmiller said:
The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.
^ Desperately wants to be ruled by a King/Dictator and not some pesky Constitution that only gives rights as written and not phony made up leftists rights that only exist if you shut your eyes and believe hard enough
Jmiller said:
The Supreme Court does not support that law anymore, Harry. Just because induced abortion was legal under English common law, before fetal movement, from the 13th century to the early 19th century, and at least three other Supreme Courts affirmed it was an established right, does not mean the current Court has to continue that legal tradition.
Because we learned more since that time period? Because of science? Slavery was still perfectly legal in that time frame, for example, along with many other now unacceptable precedents. The matter is one of constitutionality in the USA. It is in there, or it isn't, and it can be added for those who are willing to put forth the effort instead of being lazy.
Fact is, rights were expanded in a legislative sense: rights to democratic representation at the state level for the people to create the law that best fits their sensibilities. The people can chose and are free to do so.
Further proof that ***** is undefeated. Guessing Wallis Simpson 2.0 is really hitting home for the queen as well
Featured Stories
See All
85:33
16h ago
5.0k
Texas A&M earns top-25 win over Creighton in Las Vegas, 77-73
by Luke Evangelist
7:22
21h ago
7.9k
Around the SEC: Recruiting News & Trends
by Jason Howell
nsAg21
Will it take a couple years to restore the hatred/rivalry?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
17