Edward Snowden
How much longer does Putin find this idiot useful?
How much longer does Putin find this idiot useful?
TheEternalPessimist said:
Snowden reveals to the American people and the world how the government and big tech are actively spying on them and violating their privacy............................. and Snowden is the idiot?
Marcus Brutus said:
Why is he an idiot?
The NSA was running mass surveillance against the citizens of this country. The only reason they were outed and stopped is because of Snowden.
Clapper lied about it to the Senate and yet walks around a free man. Snowden is a prisoner in Russia.
Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Was the NSA actively spying on communications that were strictly within this country? If they had been better at doing so, maybe they would have caught the 9/11 attackers. As it is, none of us know how many other such attacks they might have thwarted.TheEternalPessimist said:
Snowden reveals to the American people and the world how the government and big tech are actively spying on them and violating their privacy............................. and Snowden is the idiot?
Stressboy said:Marcus Brutus said:
Why is he an idiot?
The NSA was running mass surveillance against the citizens of this country. The only reason they were outed and stopped is because of Snowden.
Clapper lied about it to the Senate and yet walks around a free man. Snowden is a prisoner in Russia.
That haven't stopped anything.
So giving top secret intelligence information to the media is okay?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
Jayhawk said:Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
" First, Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority of the documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interest - they instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries. A reiew of materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he handed over secrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nationa states."
He was on his way to South America from Hong Kong .. via Moscow ?
Who else do you think he gave them to? He fled to Moscow..Are you being serious? Are you some kind of Putin troll?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
" First, Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority of the documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interest - they instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries. A reiew of materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he handed over secrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nationa states."
He was on his way to South America from Hong Kong .. via Moscow ?
Where does it say he gave that info to Russia and China.? That is your claim.
At his point, I think you must be trolling me.
Jayhawk said:Who else do you think he gave them to? He fled to Moscow..Are you being serious? Are you some kind of Putin troll?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
" First, Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority of the documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interest - they instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries. A reiew of materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he handed over secrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nationa states."
He was on his way to South America from Hong Kong .. via Moscow ?
Where does it say he gave that info to Russia and China.? That is your claim.
At his point, I think you must be trolling me.
You accuse me of making false statements and spouting BS then decry ad hominems. You ask for cites, I have posted the official HPSCI report, to include a supporting passage from within the text that summarizes the point - which is that Snowden gave away enormous amounts of classified information and the vast majority was unrelated to domestic metadata collection.Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Who else do you think he gave them to? He fled to Moscow..Are you being serious? Are you some kind of Putin troll?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
" First, Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority of the documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interest - they instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries. A reiew of materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he handed over secrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nationa states."
He was on his way to South America from Hong Kong .. via Moscow ?
Where does it say he gave that info to Russia and China.? That is your claim.
At his point, I think you must be trolling me.
He didn't flee to Moscow. He was a fugitive at that point. To make it to South America, he was going to Moscow, then to Havana, then to Ecuador. It's not like he could have flown to Heathrow or another US friendly country, for example. He would have been detained and extradited. He had to fly through countries that were not going arrest him! Think!
Do you know who Ben Rhodes is? This is a quote from his book: "... preventing Snowden from leaving Russia as the NSA whistleblower was desperately attempting to do so. " Obama threatened Cuba and told them not to give him safe passage and Cuba complied.
That's from the Obama admin itself.
Instead of spouting BS, why don't you try investigating and getting the facts. And stop with the ad homs too.
Hmmm. Sounds like Snowden was a real Karen.Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
From page 20:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
Quote:
Since Snowdon's arrival in Moscow, he has had, and continues to have, contact with Russian intelligence services. ... and in June 2016, the deputy chairman of the Russian parliament's defense and security committee, asserted that "Snowdon did share intelligence" with his government.
backintexas2013 said:
Sorry that a bunch got to the wrong hands. Wonder if it would have happened had the nsa not been spying on Americans. They were and then it all went to ***** Maybe they should stop.
You can post all the supporting facts here…but you should know that barring a burning bush, no one on F16 changes their opinion/beliefs if it goes against the groupthink here. At Snowden supports their virtual rebellion against the government. Snowden may have alerted the public to what our government was doing, but the way he did it and what he did in addition to it was certainly treasonous.Jayhawk said:Quoting the paragraph from the report which I referenced above:Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3245797-HPSCI-Snowden-Review-Declassified.htmlMarcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:You can keep posting that but it is not true. Even cursory research will reveal that the Russians and Chinese came into possession of the whole trove. It also begs the question why did he bring terabytes worth of classified - which included information on essentially all NSA operations worldwide - if his main objective was exposing illegal domestic metadata collection?Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:Pardon me but I doubt you actually know what you are talking about. He gave them terrabytes worth of classified data on pretty much everything we had going on....Marcus Brutus said:Jayhawk said:
He gave the Russians and the Chinese everything. Everything. All NSA programs, allowing our enemies to patch up their vulnerabilities and blind us. The Russians seized on domestic metadata collection to turn what was an espionage win into an information warfare win. The NSA and the DNI (Clapper) lied about the fact of, and extent of, domestic metadata collection. It was an atrocious violation of civil liberties, but that is less than 1% of what Snowden provided to our enemies.
Your first statement is false. He never gave the Russians and Chinese anything. He gave the info to certain media, eg Post, Guardian, etc.
If we were that blinded by what Snowden did, how did we essentially know everything that the Russians were doing pre Ukraine? The intelligence that we shared with the Chinese that they then shared wuth Russia? Why were the Russians not able to block it?
Can you point to a single incident, based on the Snowden outage, where the Russians or Chinese were able to use that information to their advantage against us?
Do you believe it is a coincidence he ended up in Moscow? Do you think the Russians were cool with letting him hang out because they respect his principled stance as a civil libertarian?
I know exactly what I'm talking about.
Read my post about Russia. You are woefully ignorant on this matter.
Please provide evidence that Snowden gave them the info. You can't because there isn't any. He gave the info to members of the media.
the official HPSCI report, recommend starting at the last paragraph towards the bottom of page 2.
I read it. It doesn't support your claim.
Why don't YOU read it and show me where it says he gave them the info.
He did not flee to Russia. He was on his way to South America, with a connection in Russia.
" First, Snowden caused tremendous damage to national security, and the vast majority of the documents he stole have nothing to do with programs impacting individual privacy interest - they instead pertain to military, defense, and intelligence programs of great interest to America's adversaries. A reiew of materials Snowden compromised makes clear that he handed over secrets that protect American troops overseas and secrets that provide vital defenses against terrorists and nationa states."
He was on his way to South America from Hong Kong .. via Moscow ?