Critical military theory

2,411 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Who?mikejones!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://taskandpurpose.com/opinion/critical-military-theory/

As the youths say these days- this article is fire

Quote:

Many Americans, particularly our most senior politicians and military leaders, seem to have developed a form of dementia when it comes to warfare. The result is confusion or denial about the essential ingredients of a competent military force, and the costs of major power conflict. The memory loss is largely irrespective of political bent because all too many are seduced by a Hollywood infused sense of antiseptic warfare and push-button solutions, while forgotten are the one million casualties of the Battle of the Somme in World War I, or the almost two million in the Battle of Stalingrad in World War II.


Quote:

The condition is exacerbated and enabled when the most senior military leaders those who ought to know better defer to the idealistic judgments of those whose credentials are either nonexistent or formed entirely by ideology.


Quote:

The U.S. military has two main purposes to deter our enemies from engaging us in warfare, and if that fails, to defeat them in combat. Deterrence is only possible if the opposing force believes it will be defeated. Respect is not good enough; fear and certainty are required.


Quote:


To be true to its purpose, the U.S. military cannot be a mirror image of the society it serves. Values that are admirable in civilian society sensitivity, individuality, compassion, and tolerance for the less capable are often antithetical to the traits that deter a potential enemy and win the wars that must be fought: Conformity, discipline, unity.


Quote:

There is only one overriding standard for military capability: lethality. Those officeholders who dilute this core truth with civil society's often appropriate priorities (diversity, gender focus, etc.) undermine the military's chances of success in combat.
Combat is the harshest meritocracy that exists, and nothing but ruthless adherence to this principle contributes to deterrence and combat effectiveness.


Quote:

A military force's greatest strengths are cohesion and discipline. Individuality or group identity is corrosive and a centrifugal force.


Quote:

So what's the problem? The problem today is one of both priorities and standards. We signal a dangerous shift in priorities (as just one example) when global warming, not preparedness to defeat aggressive global competitors, is considered the greatest problem for the Department of Defense and headquarters and rank inflation blossom out of control to the point that the support element greatly diminishes the ground combat element that wins wars. A problem of standards when every Service and the Special Operations community dilute requirements based purely on merit in favor of predetermined outcomes to favor social engineering goals, and when new training requirements crowd out expectations and measurements of combat performance.


Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"To be true to its purpose, the U.S. military cannot be a mirror image of the society it serves. Values that are admirable in civilian society sensitivity, individuality, compassion, and tolerance for the less capable are often antithetical to the traits that deter a potential enemy and win the wars that must be fought: Conformity, discipline, unity."

Democrats will never accept this. To them the military is the perfect avenue to force their social agenda precisely because they can force it with the right leadership in place. They could care less about military cohesion or preparedness.

Just another in a long line of reasons why Democrat/Marxists shouldn't be anywhere near the Oval Office.
Burrus86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The world is laughing at our military. I can't help but think that this is also part of the great reset.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

"To be true to its purpose, the U.S. military cannot be a mirror image of the society it serves. Values that are admirable in civilian society sensitivity, individuality, compassion, and tolerance for the less capable are often antithetical to the traits that deter a potential enemy and win the wars that must be fought: Conformity, discipline, unity."

Democrats will never accept this. To them the military is the perfect avenue to force their social agenda precisely because they can force it with the right leadership in place. They could care less about military cohesion or preparedness.

Just another in a long line of reasons why Democrat/Marxists shouldn't be anywhere near the Oval Office.
Spot on.
JR Ewingford
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the military continues the whiny equal rights social ****, kicking people out for a fake vax, then it will be a matter of time before Russia or China sends your children home in a casket. Those people don't give 2 ****s about the liberal fantasy world wet dreams.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The world is laughing at our military
Seriously?
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only decadent idiot american liberals believe any of this ***** Our senior pols and bureaucrats were bribed or blackmailed into destroying our military, with easily willing conspirators in industry. They knew this woke bs and the misguided and wasteful budget allocation was going to kill the us. That was their job. They also have been purging real american competence from our military for over a decade now. Its a deliberate attack. And it largely worked. And lots of american useful idiots created by their prior attack on hollywood, education, media even support their own destruction. Thats HOW socialism works. Every time.
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

Quote:

The world is laughing at our military
Seriously?


The rank and file NCOs, or officers? Hell no. They're still fine-tuned instruments of death. The multi-star morons and the CinC? You're damned right they are.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know some of those "multi star morons". We are in good hands.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

I know some of those "multi star morons". We are in good hands.
We haven't won a war in decades. The hands are not that good.
JW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
liberals aren't building the military to attack an external threat though. it's all going as planned.
Jayhawk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agthatbuilds said:

https://taskandpurpose.com/opinion/critical-military-theory/

As the youths say these days- this article is fire

Quote:

Many Americans, particularly our most senior politicians and military leaders, seem to have developed a form of dementia when it comes to warfare. The result is confusion or denial about the essential ingredients of a competent military force, and the costs of major power conflict. The memory loss is largely irrespective of political bent because all too many are seduced by a Hollywood infused sense of antiseptic warfare and push-button solutions, while forgotten are the one million casualties of the Battle of the Somme in World War I, or the almost two million in the Battle of Stalingrad in World War II.


Quote:

The condition is exacerbated and enabled when the most senior military leaders those who ought to know better defer to the idealistic judgments of those whose credentials are either nonexistent or formed entirely by ideology.


Quote:

The U.S. military has two main purposes to deter our enemies from engaging us in warfare, and if that fails, to defeat them in combat. Deterrence is only possible if the opposing force believes it will be defeated. Respect is not good enough; fear and certainty are required.


Quote:


To be true to its purpose, the U.S. military cannot be a mirror image of the society it serves. Values that are admirable in civilian society sensitivity, individuality, compassion, and tolerance for the less capable are often antithetical to the traits that deter a potential enemy and win the wars that must be fought: Conformity, discipline, unity.


Quote:

There is only one overriding standard for military capability: lethality. Those officeholders who dilute this core truth with civil society's often appropriate priorities (diversity, gender focus, etc.) undermine the military's chances of success in combat.
Combat is the harshest meritocracy that exists, and nothing but ruthless adherence to this principle contributes to deterrence and combat effectiveness.


Quote:

A military force's greatest strengths are cohesion and discipline. Individuality or group identity is corrosive and a centrifugal force.


Quote:

So what's the problem? The problem today is one of both priorities and standards. We signal a dangerous shift in priorities (as just one example) when global warming, not preparedness to defeat aggressive global competitors, is considered the greatest problem for the Department of Defense and headquarters and rank inflation blossom out of control to the point that the support element greatly diminishes the ground combat element that wins wars. A problem of standards when every Service and the Special Operations community dilute requirements based purely on merit in favor of predetermined outcomes to favor social engineering goals, and when new training requirements crowd out expectations and measurements of combat performance.



This "Legio Patria Nostra" mentality of "let us just have this parallel world we live in funded by the DOD where our families shop at the NEX and we get patriotic commercials on AFN" is unrealistic and it doesn't work.

Of course the author is correct that the martial virtues must be cultivated without interference if you want to have an effective military. But the piece smacks of the sort of double think you see now with careerist military officers who are forced to suffer cognitive dissonance as they attempt to sell themselves on the idea that they are a part of a lethal and masculine tradition of arms but also knowing they need to kow tow to an ever more humiliating depth in terms of the rhetoric they must espouse and the ideas they must pretend to accept.

The reality is this: the military will by necessity reflect the values of the regime it serves. If the solution to this is to adopt a Carthaginian model where we basically firewall off the military from society then what you have is a body of mercenaries whose cause is not the people's cause (essentially what the Military Intelligence Industrial Complex has evolved into since WW2). The careerists in the MIC were content with this sort of gentleman's understanding for the past few decades but the problem is that the left is a totalizing force and has been since the Jacobins and their ideological ancestor, the Serpent in the Garden.

Eventually, you will need to bend the knee to make a military career work. The Navy SEALS must take the Vaccine and the Ranger Regiment will have women platoon leaders, and it has nothing to do with combat effectiveness. This outburst is too little too late, the time for these lamentations to have any effect has passed. War is politics and the military you go to war with will reflect the regime who sent them there. If you want a pure republican army of virtuous property owners and tax payers, well we would have to cut back the MIC. If you want a fearsome imperial MIC, then the aparatchiks who operate and maintain that system must bend the knee to the regime who prints the dollars and electronically deposits them in their Navy Federal and USAA accounts.
cecil77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't know if he originated it, but Rush's purpose of the military "to kill people and break things" is spot on.

I also think that 80 years from the last declared war it's tempting to adopt a "that could happen again" mindset. Which is false. Every crisis era has ended with bullets. To thing that this one has to end without bullets is naive and hubristic.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The biggest takeaway, which most of f16 already understands, is that if a decision doesn't enhance lethality and/or enhance care of those who served, it should be abandoned.

Making the military more green, more gender fluid, less sexist, less aggressive is harming the lethality of it by taking away vital resources that could be used for training, equipment, or things like decent post housing.

The military is not a social experiment and should not be used as such.
APHIS AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burrus86 said:

The world is laughing at our military. I can't help but think that this is also part of the great reset.
What is so sad that if we do get into a conflict, quite a few of those serving will be coming home in body bags before the "leadership" pulls its head out of their asses and start training to win.

Being unprepared is a hallmark of our military:

1. Being unprepared for WW II even though all the signs were there.

2. Getting our asses kicked at the start of Korea even though it was just five years after winning WW II.

3. Not setting goals that turned into a war of attrition for Viet Nam.

And now, a "woke" administration, along with a compliant "yes" military leadership, is destroying what once was a feared and respected military.
Hammerly High Dive Crips
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burrus86 said:

The world is laughing at our military. I can't help but think that this is also part of the great reset.


All of the chaos, division, cultural rot, and economic destruction we see today is absolutely by design.
Agnes Moffitt Rollin 60's - RIP Casper and Lil Ricky - FREE GOOFY AND LUCKY!
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most of the Flagship Officers in the Pentagon and COMS need to be fired.
Aggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The fundamental object of the military is to kill people and break things" - Rush

Rush used to rant in the 90's when we ran several "meals on wheels" type missions, but the current woke culture infiltrating the military is a disaster waiting to happen.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The military has been prioritizing political correctness and social experiments over combat effectiveness. In September 2015 the Marine Corps released a study comparing the performance of gender-integrated and male-only infantry units in simulated combat. The all-male teams greatly outperformed the integrated teams, whether on shooting, surmounting obstacles or evacuating casualties. Female Marines were injured at more than six times the rate of men during preliminary trainingunsurprising, since men's higher testosterone levels produce stronger bones and muscles. Even the fittest women (which the study participants were) must work at maximal physical capacity when carrying a 100-pound pack or repeatedly loading heavy shells into a cannon.

Ignoring the Marine study, then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter opened all combat roles to women in December 2015. Rather than requiring new female combat recruits to meet the same physical standards as men, the military began crafting "gender neutral" standards in the hope that more women would qualify. Previously, women had been admitted to noncombat specialties under lower strength and endurance requirements.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/women-dont-belong-in-combat-units-11547411638
Tom Kazansky 2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

I know some of those "multi star morons". We are in good hands.


Former soldiered military here. You're naiive and wrong.
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread needed reviving to revisit the statements by OP and others.

The U.S. military has lost its focus and should never have gone down the trails of wokery and climate change.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10502971/Army-unveils-climate-change-plan-troops-receive-orders-leave-Ukraine-amid-tensions-Russia.html
Quote:

US Army surrenders to wokery: New climate change plan will see electric fleet of non-combat vehicles by 2035 and 50% reduction in greenhouses gasses at bases

  • The U.S. Army unveiled a new climate change plan Tuesday as troops are being deployed amid tensions with Russia over Ukraine
  • The climate change report, published Tuesday, aims to make its bases more self-efficient and to move to an electric fleet of non-combat vehicles by 2035
  • The plan states the Army's 'immediate objectives' are to provide 100% carbon-pollution-free electricity for Army installations needs by 2030
  • The Army is also seeking a 50 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from all its buildings by 2032
  • The report may appear ill-timed given the fact that Russia has amassed some 120,000 troops close to the Ukrainian border, triggering fears of an invasion
  • President Joe Biden on Thursday told Americans to leave Ukraine immediately and said they would not be rescued by U.S. troops if Russia invaded
By NATASHA ANDERSON FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 11:38 EST, 11 February 2022 | UPDATED: 12:41 EST, 11 February 2022

The U.S. Army has unveiled a new climate change plan that includes an electric fleet of non-combat vehicles and a desire to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at military bases.

The woke new plan was released amid rising tensions overseas, with President Joe Biden telling Americans to leave Ukraine immediately and warning them that they could not expect to be rescued by U.S. troops if Russia launches an invasion.
I voted for this because I like Mean Tweets!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A response:

https://taskandpurpose.com/opinion/critical-military-theory-response/

I'll sum it up for you- diversity is our strength
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.