No, because we were dumb with the Three Mile Island incident and the Russians were... well Russians in their handling of Chernobyl. Death blow was finding out the Japanese built a bit nuclear plant by the sea in an area subject to Tsunamis.

When you get rich and influential dem lobbyists and donors investing heavily in nuclear power, then you'll see a sudden push for it

rgag12 said:

---

When you get rich and influential dem lobbyists and donors investing heavily in nuclear power, then you'll see a sudden push for it

---

Yes sir. Always follow the money. Right now they are buying lithium and battery disposal companies. Can't wait for the new battery operated F150.

Small modular reactors (and thorium versions) to be placed at former coal burning sites (using the steam/electrical distribution facilities) would make the most sense. Bonus for being much less damaging to the environment vs. massive land use/carbon needed for solar panel production/wind farms.

Fortunately, there is a nascent effort to do this.

Logic and the Green Movement don't go well together. That's the problem

Logic and the green movement.
Logic and jobs.
Logic and Covid.
Logic and policing.
Logic and taxation.

The libs can do none of these things

Right now energy companies are too busy nutting themselves over covid and writing new equity policies. Why would they bother!

Need to be spooling up Thorium Salt reactors left and right. In places like Texas Nat gas generators can be ran for very cheap too.

suburban cowboy said:

---

Right now energy companies are too busy nutting themselves over covid and writing new equity policies. Why would they bother!

---

Indeed, I hear this is the case. No industry is safe from the woke.

FBG_Ag78 said:

---

Logic and the Green Movement don't go well together. That's the problem

---

I have yet to see the Green Movement acknowledge that all those EVs on the road need to be charged up by ELECTRICITY. And they haven't even (to my knowledge) even ASKED THE QUESTION of how that is going to accomplished when fossil fuels are banned.

And that's just ONE example of their total lack of logic and rational thinking. EVERY damned one of their tenants is not only illogical, but NOT EVEN EXPLORED OR EXAMINED in any way.

Nope.

NormanAg said:

---

FBG_Ag78 said:

---

Logic and the Green Movement don't go well together. That's the problem

---

I have yet to see the Green Movement acknowledge that all those EVs on the road need to be charged up by ELECTRICITY. And they haven't even (to my knowledge) even ASKED THE QUESTION of how that is going to accomplished when fossil fuels are banned.

And that's just ONE example of their total lack of logic and rational thinking. EVERY damned one of their tenants is not only illogical, but NOT EVEN EXPLORED OR EXAMINED in any way.

---

Completely agree. It is like the Laws of Physics do not apply in Green Energy World. Also, there will always be just the right amount of wind and sun light to generate the energy we would need to run everything and charge our vehicles.

That's just not true they can make up genders