We do, the problem is the leftist and communists in the Mayors office and on the City Council. I don't live in Austin any more so I no longer cares if it burns down though, the voters have chosen fools to run things.whytho987654 said:
As with all of these "studies" from very biased organizations that exist to complain and make issues up, ignore it
Quote:
The report mentions the 1.4-mile stretch of highway creates form divide between the historic Deep Ellum and downtown. The Congress for the New Urbanism report is released biennially.
Quote:
TxDOT officials said they are working with the community and are working with the Texas A&M Transportation Institute to conduct an independent analysis to look at TxDOT plans, as well as the community concepts.
HTownAg98 said:
If you've been east of IH-35 lately, you would realize how wrong this is. It's all mixed use with ground floor retail and condos on top. The real dividing line is Pleasant Valley Road.
The best option would be to swap the toll road and 35 from Georgetown to Buda. Toll the part that runs through downtown and encourage all pass through traffic out to the edge of town.MuchosPollos said:Quote:
The report mentions the 1.4-mile stretch of highway creates form divide between the historic Deep Ellum and downtown. The Congress for the New Urbanism report is released biennially.
I first heard of this Dallas proposal back in 2009-2010. Lots of community meetings and public discussion. IMO it's not a bad idea. Plenty of ways to move cars through downtown on I-30, 35 and 75 then open up all sorts of real estate opportunities in the reclaimed area. However, there are way too many political/business personalities and old Dallas family money that will never allow it to happen. Hell, they can't even figure out a simple transportation link from I-30 to Baylor and downtown from 2nd Ave to Gaston......
Removing a raised highway connection on the east side of Downtown Dallas is much different than 8 miles that are THE primary artery through Austin. The "best" option for Austin would be to dig a tunnel from 71 all the way to 183. It would only to take a couple hundred billion and about 20 years.
96ags said:The best option would be to swap the toll road and 35 from Georgetown to Buda. Toll the part that runs through downtown and encourage all pass through traffic out on the edge of town.MuchosPollos said:Quote:
The report mentions the 1.4-mile stretch of highway creates form divide between the historic Deep Ellum and downtown. The Congress for the New Urbanism report is released biennially.
I first heard of this Dallas proposal back in 2009-2010. Lots of community meetings and public discussion. IMO it's not a bad idea. Plenty of ways to move cars through downtown on I-30, 35 and 75 then open up all sorts of real estate opportunities in the reclaimed area. However, there are way too many political/business personalities and old Dallas family money that will never allow it to happen. Hell, they can't even figure out a simple transportation link from I-30 to Baylor and downtown from 2nd Ave to Gaston......
Removing a raised highway connection on the east side of Downtown Dallas is much different than 8 miles that are THE primary artery through Austin. The "best" option for Austin would be to dig a tunnel from 71 all the way to 183. It would only to take a couple hundred billion and about 20 years.
Probably why it will never be considered!Burdizzo said:96ags said:The best option would be to swap the toll road and 35 from Georgetown to Buda. Toll the part that runs through downtown and encourage all pass through traffic out on the edge of town.MuchosPollos said:Quote:
The report mentions the 1.4-mile stretch of highway creates form divide between the historic Deep Ellum and downtown. The Congress for the New Urbanism report is released biennially.
I first heard of this Dallas proposal back in 2009-2010. Lots of community meetings and public discussion. IMO it's not a bad idea. Plenty of ways to move cars through downtown on I-30, 35 and 75 then open up all sorts of real estate opportunities in the reclaimed area. However, there are way too many political/business personalities and old Dallas family money that will never allow it to happen. Hell, they can't even figure out a simple transportation link from I-30 to Baylor and downtown from 2nd Ave to Gaston......
Removing a raised highway connection on the east side of Downtown Dallas is much different than 8 miles that are THE primary artery through Austin. The "best" option for Austin would be to dig a tunnel from 71 all the way to 183. It would only to take a couple hundred billion and about 20 years.
This is not the worst idea I have ever read.
but what would they call it? Chunnel is already taken.MuchosPollos said:Quote:
The report mentions the 1.4-mile stretch of highway creates form divide between the historic Deep Ellum and downtown. The Congress for the New Urbanism report is released biennially.
I first heard of this Dallas proposal back in 2009-2010. Lots of community meetings and public discussion. IMO it's not a bad idea. Plenty of ways to move cars through downtown on I-30, 35 and 75 then open up all sorts of real estate opportunities in the reclaimed area. However, there are way too many political/business personalities and old Dallas family money that will never allow it to happen. Hell, they can't even figure out a simple transportation link from I-30 to Baylor and downtown from 2nd Ave to Gaston......
Removing a raised highway connection on the east side of Downtown Dallas is much different than 8 miles that are THE primary artery through Austin. The "best" option for Austin would be to dig a tunnel from 71 all the way to 183. It would only to take a couple hundred billion and about 20 years.
Unintended consequences from when they mounted a movement to get rid of the airport and started the "Mueller Development"...Martin Cash said:
And yet when white hipsters started buying houses in East Austin, the residents started screaming against 'gentrification.'
It is also my understanding that the east side of I-35 is being gentrified.HTownAg98 said:
If you've been east of IH-35 lately, you would realize how wrong this is. It's all mixed use with ground floor retail and condos on top. The real dividing line is Pleasant Valley Road.
I used to live east of Pleasant Valley Road in the 80's and 90's. Wouldn't live there now.HTownAg98 said:
If you've been east of IH-35 lately, you would realize how wrong this is. It's all mixed use with ground floor retail and condos on top. The real dividing line is Pleasant Valley Road.
87IE said:Unintended consequences from when they mounted a movement to get rid of the airport and started the "Mueller Development"...Martin Cash said:
And yet when white hipsters started buying houses in East Austin, the residents started screaming against 'gentrification.'
Tax appraisals went up and people couldn't afford to stay in family homes so they had to sell them.
Just spoke with a buddy of mine who is a long-time Austin resident. He says he wished that he bought real estate there 10 years ago and that 900sqft. houses there are selling for $400,000 to $600,000. Sounds like POC are making bank in East Austin.Burdizzo said:87IE said:Unintended consequences from when they mounted a movement to get rid of the airport and started the "Mueller Development"...Martin Cash said:
And yet when white hipsters started buying houses in East Austin, the residents started screaming against 'gentrification.'
Tax appraisals went up and people couldn't afford to stay in family homes so they had to sell them.
A buddy of mine bought a house on E. 52nd street about 1995. When I would talk to him on the phone we would have to pause occasionally while planes passed overhead. He sold a few years later and made good money on it.
HollywoodBQ said:
They've been complaining about this since I lived in Austin in the 1990s.
I-35 is responsible for every bad thing that has ever happened to Black people in East Austin.
Apparently it was Utopia until the racist highway got built.
No word on whether the upper deck or lower deck is more racist.
Kalifornians who don't know any betterstetson said:Just spoke with a buddy of mine who is a long-time Austin resident. He says he wished that he bought real estate there 10 years ago and that 900sqft. houses there are selling for $400,000 to $600,000. Sounds like POC are making bank in East Austin.Burdizzo said:87IE said:Unintended consequences from when they mounted a movement to get rid of the airport and started the "Mueller Development"...Martin Cash said:
And yet when white hipsters started buying houses in East Austin, the residents started screaming against 'gentrification.'
Tax appraisals went up and people couldn't afford to stay in family homes so they had to sell them.
A buddy of mine bought a house on E. 52nd street about 1995. When I would talk to him on the phone we would have to pause occasionally while planes passed overhead. He sold a few years later and made good money on it.
HTownAg98 said:
If you've been east of IH-35 lately, you would realize how wrong this is. It's all mixed use with ground floor retail and condos on top. The real dividing line is Pleasant Valley Road.