The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election

11,891 Views | 92 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by TAMU1990
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Very long but tells the story.

A weird thing happened right after the Nov. 3 election: nothing.
The nation was braced for chaos. Liberal groups had vowed to take to the streets, planning hundreds of protests across the country. Right-wing militias were girding for battle. In a poll before Election Day, 75% of Americans voiced concern about violence.
Instead, an eerie quiet descended. As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets. When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
Scouts Out
aginresearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
An interesting article in Time magazine with a group called Protect Democracy.

Two quotes from the article:
Quote:

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group's inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. "Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated," says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. "But it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing."

Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not gonna read liberal propaganda. Thanks.

And we're not a democracy.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
What jubilation? There were very few large celebrations over Biden winning.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginresearch said:

An interesting article in Time magazine with a group called Protect Democracy.

Two quotes from the article:
Quote:

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group's inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. "Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated," says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. "But it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing."

Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

Uhmm? Seems to me they are saying, "Yeah we used illegal means to change the results but we only did it to save the country from another term of OMB!!"

Quasi-confession??
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

aginresearch said:

An interesting article in Time magazine with a group called Protect Democracy.

Two quotes from the article:
Quote:

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group's inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. "Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated," says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. "But it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing."

Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

Uhmm? Seems to me they are saying, "Yeah we used illegal means to change the results but we only did it to save the country from another term of OMB!!"

Quasi-confession??


This!

"Yes we did it but we did it for your own good!"
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep they are flat out bragging about how they stole the election.
Communists aren't people. They are property of the state.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

Quote:

When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
What jubilation? There were very few large celebrations over Biden winning.
Didn't you see the giant crowd at the inauguration?
Clob94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do not read this tripe.



Summation--

Big business and grass roots activists joined forces to rise up and insure Trump couldn't overthrow our "righteous" democratic victory.

This is virtue signaling at its peak.
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

aginresearch said:

An interesting article in Time magazine with a group called Protect Democracy.

Two quotes from the article:
Quote:

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group's inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. "Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated," says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. "But it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing."

Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

Uhmm? Seems to me they are saying, "Yeah we used illegal means to change the results but we only did it to save the country from another term of OMB!!"

Quasi-confession??
You nailed it Hawg.
Scouts Out
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

aginresearch said:

An interesting article in Time magazine with a group called Protect Democracy.

Two quotes from the article:
Quote:

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group's inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. "Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated," says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. "But it's massively important for the country to understand that it didn't happen accidentally. The system didn't work magically. Democracy is not self-executing."

Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

Uhmm? Seems to me they are saying, "Yeah we used illegal means to change the results but we only did it to save the country from another term of OMB!!"

Quasi-confession??
Heaven forbid the voters be the ones that actually decide the election, and not the "system".

What utter scum.

The article talks about how Trump supposedly was going to rig the election, but didn't point to anything that any state that went to Trump did that was shady or illegal.

On the other side though, in PA, GA, MI, and WI, we have private money going to pay to coach poll workers, who pulled off some very seriously shady bull*****

Nice way to try and flip the script. I aint buying.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blackhorse83 said:

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Very long but tells the story.

A weird thing happened right after the Nov. 3 election: nothing.
The nation was braced for chaos. Liberal groups had vowed to take to the streets, planning hundreds of protests across the country. Right-wing militias were girding for battle. In a poll before Election Day, 75% of Americans voiced concern about violence.
Instead, an eerie quiet descended. As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets. When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
Read it. And it ended up being exactly the leftest trash one would expect from Time.
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Got wind of the article on Bannon this morning, They are still discussing it.

They did it for our own good.
Scouts Out
Year of the Germaphobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought it was dry and boring tbh, due to the pretentious nature of the article.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

Gigem314 said:

Quote:

When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
What jubilation? There were very few large celebrations over Biden winning.
Didn't you see the giant crowd at the inauguration?
It was fitting that's for sure.
Scud Runner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The "proper " outcome.

Wow
Ronald Reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the kind of article Maplethorp cites as proof of his ridiculous arguments.
Clob94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dreama well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system's fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.
Look at this ****ing **** right here! They flat the **** out admit they changed the rules and ****ing lied in the media!

**** these ****ing people!
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just read this article and was about to post it here. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable that they would be so blatant about it. This is after gaslighting and calling everyone crazy who said exactly these conspiracy theories.

I'm so angry I don't even know how to express it.
Cen-Tex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

Yep they are flat out bragging about how they stole the election.

Shane Trejo interview re: late night ballot dump (siap)


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/exclusive-tcf-center-election-fraud-newly-recovered-video-shows-late-night-deliveries-tens-thousands-illegal-ballots-michigan-arena/
Blackhorse83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

I just read this article and was about to post it here. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable that they would be so blatant about it. This is after gaslighting and calling everyone crazy who said exactly these conspiracy theories.

I'm so angry I don't even know how to express it.
I was so pissed I was shaking.
Scouts Out
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So this is what self congratulatory mental bating looks like in print.

Not a misspelling.
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State says, "Here!"

Not sure how anybody CANNOT say the "election was not stolen"
It is better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness- Sir Terence Pratchett
“ III stooges si viveret et nos omnes ad quos etiam probabile est mittent custard pies”
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

I just read this article and was about to post it here. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable that they would be so blatant about it. This is after gaslighting and calling everyone crazy who said exactly these conspiracy theories.

I'm so angry I don't even know how to express it.


My mind just went to some very dark places.

These people richly deserve every bad thing that happens to them in life.
aginresearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's how I took it. Like other's have said they are quite proud of themselves and want everyone to know they did it selflessly for everyone else. Barf!
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The worst part of all of it is this:

They know there will never be any consequences for this and in fact they'll be richly rewarded for their parts in The Coup

The government is no longer afraid of its people
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I might add that this article is an admission of concerted efforts and acts to accomplish a common goal.

In the law, that's a conspiracy.
Clob94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maroon Dawn said:

The worst part of all of it is this:

They know there will never be any consequences for this and in fact they'll be richly rewarded for their parts in The Coup

The government is no longer afraid of its people
It falls upon us to change that. What are WE willing to do?
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gigem314 said:

Quote:

When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump's ouster.
What jubilation? There were very few large celebrations over Biden winning.


Media organizations were jubilant.
Maroon and White always! EKU/TAMU
FIDO_Ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe if the former POTUS hadn't signaled that any election he lost was fake or rigged and that he wouldn't concede, he would still be POTUS. This is what happens when you run your mouth without thinking.

BTW, Trump waving car and boat parades were stupid too. Served to alienate many Americans and they voted against him. Pep rally's only go so far, you still have to play the game and campaign to more than just your base.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FIDO_Ags said:

Maybe if the former POTUS hadn't signaled that any election he lost was fake or rigged and that he wouldn't concede, he would still be POTUS. This is what happens when you run your mouth without thinking.

BTW, Trump waving car and boat parades were stupid too. Served to alienate many Americans and they voted against him. Pep rally's only go so far, you still have to play the game and campaign to more than just your base.
Guess you didn't read the article. They were collectively bound and determined to use extra legal means to make sure he was not reelected. He was correct, they stole the election and are now admitting that they did.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FIDO_Ags said:

Maybe if the former POTUS hadn't signaled that any election he lost was fake or rigged and that he wouldn't concede, he would still be POTUS. This is what happens when you run your mouth without thinking.
Maybe if the losers of the Presidential election before that one hadn't acted like children by calling it illegitimate and making the impeachment process a complete joke...while telling Biden to not concede under any circumstances...half the country might at least be able to agree the results were legitimate.

This is what happens when you run your mouth without thinking.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FIDO_Ags said:

Hawg, you've been unhinged since Nov 3. Go have a double Scotch, no ice, it'll help!

And Gig'em, try again. Hillary Clinton did concede, so not sure what you're talking about.
Because I read the article and commented upon it, I am "unhinged"???

Really?
chase128
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clinton wouldn't shut up about Trump being an illegitimate President, and the media echoed her sentiments for four years
chase128
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scud Runner said:

The "proper " outcome.

Wow


CS Lewis speaking on tyranny comes to my mind:

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.

This describes the tyranny of the Democrat Party to a T
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.