microsoft bought them.barnyard1996 said:
Whatever happened to the GoDaddy girls?
House of Representatives, have (D) after their names. Ditto the NYT editorial board, and CNN's, and the list is miles long.MouthBQ98 said:
Jeez. Yes, there are crazies saying questionable things. Don't you want to know who and where they are?
GoDaddy or the girls?A is A said:microsoft bought them.barnyard1996 said:
Whatever happened to the GoDaddy girls?
I assume they're going with the ATF version of "it's illegal when we say it is."Slicer97 said:
Did they specify which activities were illegal or are they just making **** up?
lol.barnyard1996 said:GoDaddy or the girls?A is A said:microsoft bought them.barnyard1996 said:
Whatever happened to the GoDaddy girls?
I once read that until 1968, you could buy a gun through the mail/via magazines etc., but then the Democrats said that wasn't trustworthy enough.Slicer97 said:
Probably.
I've been wanting to get some suppressors, but can't stomach paying a fee to the ATF to own something I should just be able to walk into a store and buy.
Heck, at one time you could walk into a hardware store and pick up a Colt Monitor.nortex97 said:I once read that until 1968, you could buy a gun through the mail/via magazines etc., but then the Democrats said that wasn't trustworthy enough.Slicer97 said:
Probably.
I've been wanting to get some suppressors, but can't stomach paying a fee to the ATF to own something I should just be able to walk into a store and buy.
Just a tad ironic, now.
IIRC, as late as the late 70s one could still order guns from the Sears and Montgomery Ward catalogs.nortex97 said:I once read that until 1968, you could buy a gun through the mail/via magazines etc., but then the Democrats said that wasn't trustworthy enough.Slicer97 said:
Probably.
I've been wanting to get some suppressors, but can't stomach paying a fee to the ATF to own something I should just be able to walk into a store and buy.
Just a tad ironic, now.
nortex97 said:I once read that until 1968, you could buy a gun through the mail/via magazines etc., but then the Democrats said that wasn't trustworthy enough.Slicer97 said:
Probably.
I've been wanting to get some suppressors, but can't stomach paying a fee to the ATF to own something I should just be able to walk into a store and buy.
Just a tad ironic, now.
TxTarpon said:
Black Ice?
Where are you?
Not unrelated at all. When they begin censoring content, they should lose protections.AggieDub14 said:
In other unrelated news...
kb2001 said:
At what point does it become libel to accuse companies of illegal activities when they haven't engaged in it?
CanyonAg77 said:Not unrelated at all. When they begin censoring content, they should lose protections.AggieDub14 said:
In other unrelated news...
AggieDub14 said:
Someone has to be working on a new company that will reigster all these dropped sites. It's a great business opportunity for whoever siezes it.
And they became effeminate little soy boys who monitor websites with scary black gunsA is A said:microsoft bought them.barnyard1996 said:
Whatever happened to the GoDaddy girls?