C@LAg said:
yeah. they will not touch this.
Tibbers said:
Read the summation. They are downplaying the SOS action by saying it didn't have an effect on the overall election. This is not what you think it is OP.
Tibbers said:
Read the summation. They are downplaying the SOS action by saying it didn't have an effect on the overall election. This is not what you think it is OP.
AggieDub14 said:
SCOTUS chooses the cases they hear. So will SCOTUS actually hear this case?
black_ice said:
I'll have to remove my star form the OP if the tweet is gone.
black_ice said:
Did the tweet disappear?
AggieDub14 said:black_ice said:AggieDub14 said:
SCOTUS chooses the cases they hear. So will SCOTUS actually hear this case?
Unsure at this moment
Which means OP title is a lie. SCOTUS here we come implies it's already been decided to be heard.
Tibbers said:
It's deceptive at best and not indicative of a....wait for it....good poster.
Good Poster said:AggieDub14 said:black_ice said:AggieDub14 said:
SCOTUS chooses the cases they hear. So will SCOTUS actually hear this case?
Unsure at this moment
Which means OP title is a lie. SCOTUS here we come implies it's already been decided to be heard.
Wow, I really gotta do this?
Do you say "here we come" when you are leaving for your destination or once you've arrived? The filing is on the way to scotus. They can do what they want with it as far as choosing to hear it but it is on the way to them.
Some people........
The good guys all want big government -- the bigger the better -- and no such thing as states rights?sanangelo said:
Yes. The link was written like a Karl Marx screed. Hard to decipher but generally states court should bow to the power of the people behind the 10000 late voters by mail. Or something.
Not written by the white hats, the good guys at all.
Good Poster said:Tibbers said:
Read the summation. They are downplaying the SOS action by saying it didn't have an effect on the overall election. This is not what you think it is OP.
I didn't offer any opinion on the content. Topic title merely said, "scotus here we come" which is true. I posted it for people to offer opinions. But nice one bro.
I think Trump and Rudy make it clear she is not.HTownAg98 said:
Sidney has. That being said, if you don't consider her part of Team Trump, I understand.
kappmeyer said:
So is this the kraken? Or the side show fake kraken while the real one is still waiting to be released?