I know many on here despise Spong, but I found this an interesting read:
I have never written about the Book of Revelation because I do not regard it as worthy of the kind of study that would be required to write about this book. I'm sorry it was included in the canon of the New Testament because it is so dated. It is a piece of apocalyptic literature written under a code developed by late 1st century Christians. Presumably the community that wrote this book and that received it would understand that it was designed to strengthen them to endure a persecution that was probably local, not empire wide, in the last decade of the 1st Christian century. It is a product of the same Johannine School that produced the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John in the New Testament though it is not by the same author. It probably does participate in the idea that the world is coming to an end soon but that was obviously a mistake since we are here now. In early Christianity there was an idea that the second coming of Jesus and the dawning of the Kingdom of God on earth would come in the lifetime of people living then. Paul advances this idea both in I Thessalonians and in I Corinthians. By the end of the 1st century that idea had begun to die out and was replaced by the suggestion that the church must be built for the long term. The book of Acts reflects this new consensus. The book of Revelation reflects a throwback to the earlier attitude and may have been inspired by the current local persecution that was interpreted as the beginning of the cruelty that would accompany the end of the world. In later years, when the supposed date of Jesus' birth was set and time counted from that day forward, end of the world talk has always accompanied the end of a century and was even more pronounced at the end of a millennium.
I have no truck with those who read the Bible this way. Predictions about the end of the world, talk about the "rapture" and "no child left behind" are all so much literal nonsense to me.
I have read the book of Revelation on several occasions. I studied it when I was in seminary, but in no great depth. Today I would rather spend my time on the gospels, Paul, or even the prophets, all of which have enriched my life greatly. I do not see such potential in the book of Revelation.
When one tries to interpret the symbols as Mr. Redel does in his letter, he falls into the trap of assuming that there is some literal truth that needs to be discovered. That is not the case. If all the copies of the book of Revelation were lost tomorrow, I do not believe much of value would disappear. However, it does keep some religious fanatics busy so maybe that is its primary purpose.
Thank you for your letter.
-- John Shelby Spong
I have never written about the Book of Revelation because I do not regard it as worthy of the kind of study that would be required to write about this book. I'm sorry it was included in the canon of the New Testament because it is so dated. It is a piece of apocalyptic literature written under a code developed by late 1st century Christians. Presumably the community that wrote this book and that received it would understand that it was designed to strengthen them to endure a persecution that was probably local, not empire wide, in the last decade of the 1st Christian century. It is a product of the same Johannine School that produced the Gospel of John and the Epistles of John in the New Testament though it is not by the same author. It probably does participate in the idea that the world is coming to an end soon but that was obviously a mistake since we are here now. In early Christianity there was an idea that the second coming of Jesus and the dawning of the Kingdom of God on earth would come in the lifetime of people living then. Paul advances this idea both in I Thessalonians and in I Corinthians. By the end of the 1st century that idea had begun to die out and was replaced by the suggestion that the church must be built for the long term. The book of Acts reflects this new consensus. The book of Revelation reflects a throwback to the earlier attitude and may have been inspired by the current local persecution that was interpreted as the beginning of the cruelty that would accompany the end of the world. In later years, when the supposed date of Jesus' birth was set and time counted from that day forward, end of the world talk has always accompanied the end of a century and was even more pronounced at the end of a millennium.
I have no truck with those who read the Bible this way. Predictions about the end of the world, talk about the "rapture" and "no child left behind" are all so much literal nonsense to me.
I have read the book of Revelation on several occasions. I studied it when I was in seminary, but in no great depth. Today I would rather spend my time on the gospels, Paul, or even the prophets, all of which have enriched my life greatly. I do not see such potential in the book of Revelation.
When one tries to interpret the symbols as Mr. Redel does in his letter, he falls into the trap of assuming that there is some literal truth that needs to be discovered. That is not the case. If all the copies of the book of Revelation were lost tomorrow, I do not believe much of value would disappear. However, it does keep some religious fanatics busy so maybe that is its primary purpose.
Thank you for your letter.
-- John Shelby Spong
