Rethinking the Good Samaritan

744 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 19 yr ago by Guadaloop474
Fightin TX Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
LUKE 10: 25-37

25On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. "Teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?"

26"What is written in the Law?" he replied. "How do you read it?"

27He answered: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"

28"You have answered correctly," Jesus replied. "Do this and you will live."

29But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"

30In reply Jesus said: "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, took him to an inn and took care of him. 35The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper. 'Look after him,' he said, 'and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.'

36"Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"

37The expert in the law replied, "The one who had mercy on him."
Jesus told him, "Go and do likewise."
The standard view on this parable is below:

quote:
In Jesus' story, a man is overcome by a band of robbers and left on the road to die. As he lies there, his life passes before him. Then a priest comes down the road. The expectation culturally would be relief: "Surely help is on the way now." Luke's statement that the priest appeared "by chance" (Greek) suggests a note of hope that fortune has smiled on the wounded man. The NIV renders this A priest happened to be going down the same road. But the priest does not stop. Rather, he crosses to the other side and keeps going. The detail about crossing the road is no accident. It is a brilliant use of literary space: the priest gets as far away as possible from the wounded man as he passes by.

A Levite, another potential source of aid, arrives on the scene. As one who served in the temple, he will surely have compassion, stop and render aid. But when he sees the man, he also crosses to the other side of the road and keeps on moving. So two men of similar Jewish background have failed to render aid. They have failed to be neighbors.

Interpreters speculate as to why they refuse to help. Do they fear being jumped themselves? Do they fear being rendered unclean? The text gives us no reason. As is often the case, the bother and discomfort of helping have kept the man dying on the road. Getting involved is costly, and for many the investment is too high. But to refuse to help is moral failure.

But now another traveler comes on the scene. In Greek the text highlights this man's arrival by placing his ethnic identity, a Samaritan, at the front of the description. The scribe hearing Jesus tell the story must be thinking, "There will be no help from this half-breed." But as often happens in Jesus' parables, a twist on cultural expectations yields this story's major point: the despised schismatic will be the model of neighborliness. Maybe "enemies" can love God and be examples.

Jesus focuses his language now. In as many words as he used to describe the activity of the two Jewish leaders, he details all the Samaritan does to save the man--six actions in all. He comes up to the man, binds his wounds, anoints him with oil to comfort him, loads him on his mule, takes him to an inn and cares for him, even paying for his whole stay. In fact, given the amount the Samaritan leaves with the innkeeper, the injured man probably has about three and a half weeks to recover if he needs it, since the going inn rate was one-twelfth of a denarius and two denarii was two days' wages.

Jesus' question to close the story requires no brilliant reply: "Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"

The lawyer knows, but he cannot even bring himself to mention the man's race. The lawyer is choosy about his neighbors. He does not understand the call of God. Nevertheless, he answers, "The one who had mercy on him."

This reply is correct, so Jesus simply says, "Go and do likewise." Jesus' point is, Simply be a neighbor. Do not rule out certain people as neighbors. And his parable makes the point emphatically by providing a model from a group the lawyer had probably excluded as possible neighbors.

To love God means to show mercy to those in need. An authentic life is found in serving God and caring for others. This is a central tenet of discipleship. Here human beings fulfill their created role--to love God and be a neighbor to others by meeting their needs. Neighbors are not determined by race, creed or gender; neighbors consist of anyone in need made in the image of God.

www.biblegateway.com/resources/commentaries/?action
=getCommentaryText&cid=3&source=1&seq=i.49.10.1

But there is another view on this parable.
quote:
"And who is my neighbor?" an expert of the law asks in fury, annoyed with Jesus' message and behavior that frustrates every notion of conventional "righteousness" (Luke 10:29). Jesus embarks on one of his breathtaking stories about a man, a "righteous" man, apparently the hero of the narrative, suddenly transformed into the "enemy," replaced by a new hero, a Samaritan, an "unrighteous" man. New Testament scholars have pointed out that in this story, the man called to love his enemy is not the Samaritan, but actually the man who lay wounded, stripped of his clothes, half dead. For he, rather than the Samaritan, is the character in the story with whom Jesus' audience would have been able to identify. By inviting the wounded to accept to be helped by his conventional enemy, Jesus calls every one of us to accept to be helped by God, the "outcast," whom we have rejected.

www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/130/22.0.html
What do you think? Is either interpretation right - or are they both right?
pocketrockets06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting. I think both could be correct. Neither interpration would be inconsistent with the gospel.
Fightin TX Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with the second analogy is the other men who walked by. If the Samaritan represents God, what do the priest and the Pharisee represent?

I still find the possible double meaning rather beautiful.
opk
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Something in this passage caught my attention and I find this passage interesting from another perspective.

The question asked in the parable is "what must I do to inherit eternal life?" and Jesus responded "Do this and you will live." Not, "believe thus an so" but "do"....a small but powerful word. This instance Jesus's teaching is very much in the Jewish tradition, a tradition of action as opposed to simply believing. The lesson here, as I see it, is the importance of how one demonstrates ones belief through ones actions.

[Faith -vs- works discussion starting in 5..4..3..2...]






opie03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
The question asked in the parable is "what must I do to inherit eternal life?" and Jesus responded "Do this and you will live." Not, "believe thus an so" but "do"....a small but powerful word.


The "Do" is in reference to the action of loving your neighbor as yourself, not the act of helping the man on the side of the road. The physical acts are not a requirement of the love, but evidence of that love.

I didn't turn my truck around on my way home this weekend to help a stranger change a tire because I needed to "enact my love in order to have it." I have love for my fellow man, so I turned around and helped him (and his family) out. My love for those around me is unconditional. Random acts of kindness are evidence of that.

-------------------------------------------------------
If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you can read this in English, thank a Soldier.
Fightin TX Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Statement: "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind'; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"

Response: "You have answered correctly. Do this and you will live."

So, what you are to DO is love God and love others. This is the very heart of Christ's teaching. LOVE GOD and LOVE OTHERS.
Mrs. Lovelight
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
The physical acts are not a requirement of the love, but evidence of that love.


I agree w/this statement, the act of doing good is the result of loving others. Love is an attitude of desiring good for the other person which in turn spurs you to act out the good to them. Just as James says faith without works is dead. Faith that doesn't produce anything is pretty much useless and therefore ineffective and dead. So it is w/love, love w/o action is useless and ineffective.

Christ's calling and standard is so high that it calls for us to be sacrificial in our love toward Him and others and I'm often unwilling and too selfish to love.
Raj95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Arguing faith vs. works is like arguing about which came first? the chicken or the egg.

[This message has been edited by Raj95 (edited 7/26/2006 1:08p).]
Guadaloop474
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our families should be the model for us in love. If we project that love (sacrificial) to others for the sake of Christ, then we have learned well.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.