Empirical evidence in the sanctifying influence of Christian faith

426 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by fat girlfriend
fat girlfriend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/what-does-christianity-predict-about-character-improvement-and-does-the-empirical-evidence-back-it-up/9F6E5C0D8C5878A4BB8E80244B576923?utm_id=97757_v0_s00_e0_tv2_a1dennhbdftx5p#article

Quote:

  • Those who regularly attended religious services were 25% more likely to give to charity than those who did rarely or said they were not religious (9166 percent). They also were 23% more likely to volunteer (6744 percent). In 2000, they gave away 3.5 times more money per year (2,210642) and volunteered more than twice as much (12 times versus 5.8 times) (Brooks Reference Brooks2006).
  • 'In 2002, religious people were far more likely to donate blood than secularists, to give food or money to a homeless person, to return change mistakenly given them by a cashier, and to express empathy for less fortunate people … religious people were 57 percent more likely than secularists to help a homeless person at least once a month' (Brooks Reference Brooks2006, 39).
  • Similarly, other studies found that, for instance, over 20% of fundamentalists, evangelicals, mainline, and liberal Protestants self-reported giving away 'a lot' of money to organizations which help the poor in the past two years, whereas only 9.5% of nonreligious respondents did. In general, the latter group was 0.70 times as likely to give to such organizations as religious people were, regardless of what type of religion was subscribed to (Regnerus et al. Reference Regnerus, Smith and Sikkink1998).Footnote21
  • In their literature review of 77 studies, Yasin and colleagues found that 'religion measured as group affiliation, values, beliefs, and the importance of faith to the believer, as well as religious service attendance and private prayer most often positively relates with giving to outgroup and secular organizations' (Yasin et al. Reference Yasin, Adams and King2020, 11).Footnote22
Non-malevolence. While compassion has to do with helping, non-malevolence is a virtue concerned with not harming others. Donating to charity would fall under the scope of compassion, whereas something like not assaulting a person would fall under the scope of non-malevolence. Here is some relevant data in this area:
  • Ellison and Anderson found that based on self-reports, men who attend religious services once a week or more are 60.7% less likely than nonattenders to commit domestic violence. Partner reports show a 48.7% decrease (Ellison and Anderson Reference Ellison and Anderson2001).Footnote23
  • Johnson and Siegel found that 'the probability of committing a non-drug crime was 39 percent smaller for youth who attended church more than once a week compared to youth who did not attend, and the difference for drug use was found to be 46 percent. Finally, the probability of youth selling drugs was 57 percent smaller among regular church-attendees than non-attendees' (Johnson and Jang Reference Johnson and Jang2010, 119, citing Johnson and Siegel Reference Johnson and Siegel2002).
  • Using a large sample of German adolescents, Dirk Baier found that 30% of Muslims versus 18% of Christians self-reported engaging in at least one instance of violent behaviour in the past 12 months (Baier Reference Baier2014, 114). And higher religiosity decreased violence for Christians but not in a statistically significant way for Muslims (Baier Reference Baier2014, 117).
  • Religious attendance was correlated with reduced self-reported performance of 43 different crimes (Evans et al. Reference Evans, Cullen, Dunaway and Burton1995). In another study, religiosity was correlated with decreased delinquency using a self-report measure with 35 different delinquent behaviours; indeed the authors found some evidence for reciprocal causation (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Jang, Larson and De Li2001, 3536). Other studies also found negative relationships between various measures of religiosity on the one hand and crime and violence on the other (Lipford et al. Reference Lipford, McCormick and Tollison1993; Hull and Bold Reference Hull and Bold1995; Hull Reference Hull2000; Salas-Wright et al. Reference Salas-Wright, Vaughn and Maynard2014).
  • A 2001 meta-analysis of 60 studies found 'religious behavior and beliefs exert a significant, moderate deterrent effect on individuals' criminal behavior' (Baier and Wright Reference Baier and Wright2001, 14). A systematic review in 2000 of 40 studies found that 'Religious measures are generally inversely related to deviance, and this is especially true among the most rigorous studies' (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, De Li, Larson and McCullough2000, 32). In 2010, a review of 270 studies found 'an inverse or beneficial relationship between religion and some measure of crime or delinquency' in 90% of the studies (Johnson and Jang Reference Johnson and Jang2010, 120).
Honesty. This virtue covers many behaviours, but here we will just focus on lying (for a detailed study of honesty, see Miller Reference Miller2021). Unfortunately, there are not many studies, but these are a few results:
  • Students at a university in Canada played an economic game with a partner where they could lie to get a bigger financial pay-off for themselves. Students for whom religion was more important tended to lie a bit more (Childs Reference Childs2013). But in another study, this time at a Catholic university in the U.S., overall religiosity, frequency of prayer, and the importance of religion in daily life all increased the odds that a student would send an honest message in a similar situation (Christie Reference Christie2019).
  • A study found that undergraduate students at a school in the U.S. who tended to agree with items like 'Lying is no big deal' and 'What people don't know can't hurt them' also tended to be less religious. It was concluded that lying acceptability correlates negatively with religiosity (Oliveira and Levine Reference Oliveira and Levine2008).
  • Finally, a study examined counties in the U.S. that were more or less religious. It found that companies in more religious counties tended to be less likely to misrepresent their financial statements, to employ tax sheltering, and to withhold bad news in financial disclosures (Dyreng et al. Reference Dyreng, Mayew and Williams2012).
Self-control. This virtue includes acting with moderation and resisting temptation to do something bad or wrong. Here is a quick summary of various trends:Footnote24


Rocag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most of those studies report measuring religiosity or attendance of religious services and don't specifically break it down into whether those were Christian or something else. It'd be interesting to see whether the results hold true for very religious, service attending members of non-Christian religions. I suspect that they would in most cases.

One thing religion is very good at is creating a sense of community. By contrast atheists and agnostics aren't typically in the habit of meeting up regularly to talk about their non-belief. They never create those groups that encourage assisting others within the group.
fat girlfriend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocag said:

Most of those studies report measuring religiosity or attendance of religious services and don't specifically break it down into whether those were Christian or something else. It'd be interesting to see whether the results hold true for very religious, service attending members of non-Christian religions. I suspect that they would in most cases.

I suspect so, too, which is just what you would expect, were Christianity true.

Quote:

One thing religion is very good at is creating a sense of community. By contrast atheists and agnostics aren't typically in the habit of meeting up regularly to talk about their non-belief. They never create those groups that encourage assisting others within the group.

It's striking to me how effectively Christianity can often be a power to move people not only to help those within their community, but outside of it as well.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.