Spouting Radicalized Philosophies

2,058 Views | 24 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Rongagin71
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An absolute clown ironically possessed by radical philosophies.

craigernaught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess the word "philosophies" is technically included, but I doubt this belongs on this board.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unless you're concerned she means Platonists, 16chan is one forum down.
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Worth the try
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those damn chemists and their radical philosophies!
Beer Baron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beer Baron said:

There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.


Is he the same one who claims Jewish people are evil?

We've also got multiple Republicans running for high office who have taken endorsements and support from the founder of Gab, a known and proud antisemite. The current AZ Republican Senate candidate approvingly quoted a Nazi war criminal and pushed antisemitic conspiracy theories. Hmmm. Maybe the good governor is on to something.
Beer Baron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably? I just think there are certain things many of us could agree are "radicalized" even if we disagree on a lot of other things. I don't think the answer is to say it's bad to be on the lookout for it, because plenty of people are objectively nuts and again I think we could agree on who many of those people are. I wouldn't hire someone who thought it was cool to stone Christians either.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, I'm not in favor of prosecuting anyone for what they write (unless you're talking about something clearly advocating violence or permitting a crime to occur), but if you're going to spout that sort of stuff on social media, there's nothing that says it can't be used in deciding whether you should be given a specific job.
Beer Baron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, people attack this like there aren't plenty of examples of awful people saying awful things. Lots of stuff is just disagreement, but if you're talking about killing people, or civil war, stuff like that - you're not stable regardless of left or right motivation for saying it.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beer Baron said:

There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.


What are you worried about. It's not like you work in a rock quarry.

Ok that was terrible, and I feel a little bad about it. But I had to.

We're all gods children and deserve to be treated with love and respect, except for vegans, they're not human.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obviously an islamophobe.
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beer Baron said:

Probably? I just think there are certain things many of us could agree are "radicalized" even if we disagree on a lot of other things. I don't think the answer is to say it's bad to be on the lookout for it, because plenty of people are objectively nuts and again I think we could agree on who many of those people are. I wouldn't hire someone who thought it was cool to stone Christians either.
The margins of society are coming out in full force now which is why her statement is ironic imo. It was inevitable for classical liberalism to fail because the individual just turns to self worship. It didn't even take very long when comparing other societies.

It's nothing new but some people look a little further back and would rather not regress to hedonistic cultures of the past. Ironically the idiot modern feminists want this culture, not knowing it has historically been male dominated and savage to the point where their minds couldn't fully conceive how terrifying it was. But it seems the new game could be worse given the unlimited identities one could attach to.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have "Christian nationalists" who want to harm marginalized populations like LGBTQ people and religious minorities through the force of government and your concern are people in favor of individual autonomy and rights? I'm aware of women's rights through history. When they were legally considered dead and property after marriage (coverture) was done under explicitly Christian societies. Pretty sure that wasn't some era of harmony.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

We have "Christian nationalists" who want to harm marginalized populations like LGBTQ people and religious minorities through the force of government and your concern are people in favor of individual autonomy and rights? I'm aware of women's rights through history. When they were legally considered dead and property after marriage (coverture) was done under explicitly Christian societies. Pretty sure that wasn't some era of harmony.


People forget how recent this was the case for married women. I mean RECENT. Like in Texas we are talking about " in my lifetime" recent


https://www.texasmonthly.com/being-texan/until-1968-married-texas-woman-couldnt-own-property-start-business-without-husbands-permission-dallas-attorney-changed-that/

swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beer Baron said:

There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.

If it helps, I bet he'd be hesitant to be employed by you as well.
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

We have "Christian nationalists" who want to harm marginalized populations like LGBTQ people and religious minorities through the force of government and your concern are people in favor of individual autonomy and rights? I'm aware of women's rights through history. When they were legally considered dead and property after marriage (coverture) was done under explicitly Christian societies. Pretty sure that wasn't some era of harmony.
Yes because free will isn't free when the ego is inflated. Our corporations and leaders know this. Thats how they control us for now. Just let the passions take over and isolate the individual to their own island of belief. Dollar bills for them and control based on their worldview which apparently is some type of materialism with the end goal of uploading human consciousnesses, whatever that means.

What's happening now is the margins are really coming out and the wolves are coming with them. I'm not necessarily talking about the gays since they are now judging the rest of LBGTQ in many cases (ironically of course). They already had their move towards the center but I don't think the gays can uphold society either. The breakdown of the individual into whatever passion takes over is going to destroy this country because there will be no boundaries but that's the point of all these movements.

I'm talking about going before Christianity where woman had nothing. Rome was an apex predator and then men there loved only other men and young boys. In fact the highest love was that of a man and younger boy. Men will take over in our society but for all that wrong reasons. It won't be Christian in any original sense that upheld women in the image of Christ and Mary. It's just going to be a bunch of predators looking to satisfy their desires.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

It won't be Christian in any original sense that upheld women in the image of Christ and Mary. It's just going to be a bunch of predators looking to satisfy their desires.


This is satire, right? Tell me this is satire and you don't actually think history supports this belief. The predators looking to satisfy their desires were not pagans for most of known European history.
barbacoa taco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beer Baron said:

There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.
wow why are you so anti-free speech? /f16
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
larry culpepper said:

Beer Baron said:

There was a guy in a primary for an Oklahoma house or congressional seat who talked about how it's fine to stone the gays. I'd be hesitant to hire him.
wow why are you so anti-free speech religious freedom ? /f16


Fify
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

Quote:

It won't be Christian in any original sense that upheld women in the image of Christ and Mary. It's just going to be a bunch of predators looking to satisfy their desires.


This is satire, right? Tell me this is satire and you don't actually think history supports this belief. The predators looking to satisfy their desires were not pagans for most of known European history.
Oh right it must have been some understanding and sympathetic people systematically murdering and raping early Christians haha. Roman Emperors and men we're totally known to be good people! You do realize Paul evangelized Roman men right? Paul going around telling men they can't have sex with anyone they please because they are made in the image of Christ? You must honestly believe that these men held woman and children in some high standard or something.

As for other areas "pagan" is a very broad term encompassing many regions and times. Some were better than others.
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

It was inevitable for classical liberalism to fail
But, then again, isn't it inevitable that all political systems will fail? Is it really fair to judge earthly political systems by whether they're eternal or not?
KingofHazor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Duncan Idaho said:

Sapper Redux said:

We have "Christian nationalists" who want to harm marginalized populations like LGBTQ people and religious minorities through the force of government and your concern are people in favor of individual autonomy and rights? I'm aware of women's rights through history. When they were legally considered dead and property after marriage (coverture) was done under explicitly Christian societies. Pretty sure that wasn't some era of harmony.


People forget how recent this was the case for married women. I mean RECENT. Like in Texas we are talking about " in my lifetime" recent


https://www.texasmonthly.com/being-texan/until-1968-married-texas-woman-couldnt-own-property-start-business-without-husbands-permission-dallas-attorney-changed-that/


The state of the law in Texas pre-67 was wrong and needed to be changed, but it wasn't quite putting women in the category that you highlighted. In fact, Texas's earlier adoption of the Spanish system of community property was considered quite liberal and advanced at the time in terms of the property rights and protection that it gave women.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you haven't read what Christians did in history. Got it.
Rongagin71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since we are already derailed, here is an interesting legal discussion of community property that mentions Texas and its "radical" Spanish roots.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.