The problem with biblical archeology. (a book review)

368 Views | 4 Replies | Last: 17 yr ago by amercer
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
What is saddest about the James Ossuary case is that, if the police are correct, Oded Golan took an ancient object, important in itself as a link to a lost past, and vandalized it in the hope of increasing its financial value. Such trickery seeks to exploit a problem at the heart of biblical archaeology: the desire to prove what is essentially unverifiable. That archaeology reveals a fuller picture of the daily lives of ordinary people in the biblical world should be enough.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122446027022248721.html
Bracy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Piltdown Man.
boboguitar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hate to admit it but Bracy has a point.
yesno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That archaeology reveals a fuller picture of the daily lives of ordinary people in the biblical world should be enough.
****************\
Agree. But I do have a piece of the cross I can sell you.
boboguitar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thats also a problem in more fields of archaeology than just biblical. Nautical Archaeology has its share of treasure seekers who find ancient ships, dynamite them to get through the wood, and take the precious metals for profit. Or like in Japan, the archaeologist who was foraging his sites until discovered. Thankfully, most hoaxes are found out.
amercer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Hate to admit it but Bracy has a point.


no doubt. there are motivations to fake (or willfully misinterpret) artifacts in all sorts of archeology. I do think that there is a case to be made that the motivations may be stronger when religion is concerned.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.