Guard
5′8″
New York, NY
The Mary Louis Academy (Notre Dame)
Junior
TexAgs presents STACKED: Annual Report 2022
One year into the STACKED program, TexAgs presents our first annual report of how much has been brought in and paid out, as well as which athletes have been contracted. With over $500,000 already distributed to Texas A&M student-athletes, we are looking forward to 2023!
17:10
Press Conference: Aggies face Vanderbilt in first round of SEC Tournament
Needing to put together a deep run in the conference tournament, Gary Blair and Texas A&M open the 2022 SEC Tournament with the Vanderbilt Commodores. Ahead of Wednesday's first-round matchup, Blair, Jordan Nixon and Destiny Pitts spoke to the media.
17:20
Texas A&M falls to No. 25 Georgia on the road in regular-season finale, 67-58
Texas A&M failed to salvage legendary head coach Gary Blair's final regular-season game as the Aggies fell to No. 25 Georgia, 67-58, in Athens on Sunday afternoon. Aaliyah Patty's 15-point, 10-rebound double-double was not enough to escape Athens with a win.
5:11
Jordan Nixon & Qadashah Hoppie form all-NYC backcourt in Aggieland
In Gary Blair's final season, the legendary head coach has a pair of New York products running his backcourt. Jordan Nixon and Qadashah Hoppie spoke to TexAgs about bringing their NYC style to Aggieland, playing for Blair and much more.
10:07
At the free-throw line with Texas A&M point guard Jordan Nixon
Texas A&M point guard Jordan Nixon became a household name after hitting a buzzer-beater in the NCAA Tournament against Iowa State. Nixon joined Mike Lucas for a Stacked exclusive to drill some shots and answer some questions.
All Updates
2/26/2022
Jordan Nixon & Qadashah Hoppie form all-NYC backcourt in Aggieland
2/23/2022
At the free-throw line with Texas A&M point guard Jordan Nixon
2/7/2022
Around Aggieland (2/7)
1/23/2022
Fourth quarter struggles plague the Aggies in loss to Missouri, 78-69
1/20/2022
Texas A&M drops fifth SEC game, falls to Ole Miss at home, 80-63
1/17/2022
Around Aggieland (1/17)
1/2/2022
Fourth-quarter woes plague No. 23 A&M as Aggies fall to No. 19 LSU, 75-66
12/10/2021
Around Aggieland (12/10)
11/29/2021
Around Aggieland (11/29)
11/19/2021
Around Aggieland (11/19)
11/17/2021
Blair pleased with undefeated Aggies continuing to improve with each game
11/12/2021
Around Aggieland (11/12)
11/5/2021
Around Aggieland (11/5)
10/29/2021
Around Aggieland (10/29)
3/26/2021
Around Aggieland (3/26)
3/25/2021
Press Row: Aggie beat writers discuss Nixon's heroics, Sweet 16 berth
2/26/2021
Around Aggieland (2/26)
2/8/2021
Around Aggieland (2/8)
2/5/2021
Around Aggieland (2/5)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.