Outfielder
5′11″
Santa Clarita, CA
Saugus (Arizona)
Senior
3/6/2024
Trisha Ford & Co. are off to hottest start since 2017 as SEC play looms
2/24/2024
No. 17 Aggies split doubleheader with loss to Kansas, win over NDSU
2/21/2024
A perfect start: Trisha Ford details Texas A&M softball's 5-0 weekend
5/19/2023
Coleman's walk-off single vs. Texas State opens Austin Regional in style
5/9/2023
Trisha Ford's Aggies begin the 'fun stuff' this week at SEC Tournament
5/5/2023
Around Aggieland (5/5)
5/1/2023
Around Aggieland (5/1)
4/28/2023
Around Aggieland (4/28)
4/25/2023
No-No! Leavitt & Kennedy toss combined gem in 12-0 rout of PVAMU
3/18/2023
No. 21 Aggies fall as No. 17 Bulldogs rally back in final inning, 6-5
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.