Pitcher
5′6″
Chino, CA
Ayala/Minnesota
Senior
2 days ago by
Haley Golab
Pair of Saturday shutouts moves No. 7 A&M to 5-0 in the Aggie Classic
Playing a Saturday doubleheader at Davis Diamond, No. 7 Texas A&M blanked Abilene Christian 1-0 before shutting out Villanova in five innings 8-0 on the third day of the Aggie Classic. The Maroon & White will wrap up the weekend vs. Purdue on Sunday.
5 days ago by
Haley Golab
All-American Kennedy anchors Texas A&M's strong pitching staff
Led by All-American and All-SEC left-hander Emiley Kennedy, Trisha Ford's pitching staff is re-vamped and ready for the Southeastern Conference gauntlet that awaits. In total, Ford has seven pitchers on her 2025 roster, including a pair of transfers and three freshmen.
27:09
A&M's season ends with 6-5 loss in third game of Austin Super Regional
Down to their final three outs and trailing by four runs, Texas A&M softball attempted to rally in the seventh, but the Aggies ultimately fell short as top-seeded Texas emerged victorious on Sunday, 6-5. A&M's 2024 campaign comes to a close with a 44-15 overall record.
8:18
Ford & Co. set for test with No. 1 Longhorns in Austin Super Regional
Two schools separated by about 100 miles will meet on the diamond with a trip to the Women's College World Series on the line. On Wednesday, head coach Trisha Ford joined TexAgs Radio to preview the matchup between the No. 16 Aggies and No. 1 Longhorns.
12:56
No. 16 seed A&M breezes by UAlbany in NCAA Tournament opener, 6-2
Despite surrendering a pair of first-inning runs, No. 16 national seed Texas A&M scored six unearned runs to cruise to an NCAA Tournament-opening win over UAlbany, 6-2. With the victory, the Aggies advance to face Texas State in the winners' bracket on Saturday.
All Updates
5/22/2024
Ford & Co. set for test with No. 1 Longhorns in Austin Super Regional
5/15/2024
Trisha Ford, No. 16 seed A&M preparing to host first regional since 2018
4/11/2024
A&M legend Megan Gibson sees the Ags trending up in Ford's second year
4/3/2024
Trisha Ford, No. 14 Aggies ready for another competitive SEC series
3/6/2024
Trisha Ford & Co. are off to hottest start since 2017 as SEC play looms
4/28/2023
Around Aggieland (4/28)
4/25/2023
No-No! Leavitt & Kennedy toss combined gem in 12-0 rout of PVAMU
4/24/2023
Around Aggieland (4/24)
4/10/2023
Around Aggieland (4/10)
3/31/2023
Around Aggieland (3/31)
3/19/2023
No. 21 A&M run-ruled at home as No. 17 Georgia completes sweep, 8-0
3/17/2023
No. 17 Bulldogs punch first as No. 21 Aggies fall in SEC home opener, 7-5
3/14/2023
A&M softball already able to overcome adversity in Ford's first season
2/28/2023
Trisha Ford & Co. off to promising start on the diamond in 2023
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.