Defensive Back
5′10″
/
195 lbs
Independence, KS
Senior (RS)
Defense in Review: Auburn 42, Texas A&M 27
Texas A&M's defensive performance against Auburn was a mixed bag. The Aggies played well for the first 28 minutes of game time but faded down the stretch and struggled to defend the deep ball. Billy Liucci dissects the showing.
Key Matchups: Texas A&M vs. No. 14 Auburn
Texas A&M will enter Kyle Field on Saturday as a decided underdog to the Auburn Tigers, who boast one of the SEC's best defenses. Billy Liucci breaks down the matchups that will determine if the Aggies can pull the upset.
Defense in Review: Mississippi State 35, Texas A&M 14
Texas A&M improved upon its 2016 defensive performance against Mississippi State on Saturday but still turned in its worst four-quarter showing of the season. Billy Liucci breaks down the good, bad and ugly from the 35-14 loss.
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 19, Florida 17
Coming off of huge tilts against top-ranked Alabama and the Gators in The Swamp, the Aggie defense has proven it's SEC ready. After some early struggles against Florida, the unit was dominant in the second half, with key contributions from veterans and newcomers alike.
Defense in Review: Texas A&M 24, South Carolina 17
The Aggie defense still showed the propensity to give up the big play in Saturday's win over the Gamecocks at Kyle Field, but a smothering fourth quarter effort helped Texas A&M put the game away late.
All Updates
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
