Defensive Back
6′2″
/
180 lbs
Pasadena, CA
Arizona Western C.C.
Senior
25:49
John Harris offers way too early predictions on A&M's draft eligible players
It's never too early to start making some way-too-early predictions and projections for the 2022 NFL Draft, and our draft expert John Harris joined to share what he thinks a host of draft-eligible Aggies will fall in April.
Ask Liucci, Part 2: OL & DL development, who's next at LB, on-campus visits & more
Billy Liucci rolls out another round of answers to subscriber questions, today addressing the Aggies' task at replacing most of the o-line, the growing depth of elite talent on the d-line, who is emerging at LB, which wrestling star would be the best fit as an A&M fan and much more.
Spring Camp 2021: Week One Updates & Insights
The Aggies are a week into spring camp, going through full spring drills for the first time in two years. Billy Liucci offers some early notes and updates as A&M digs into early preparations for the 2021 season.
Ask Liucci, Part 2: Spring expectations, new contributors, QB development & more
Billy dips into a second round of subscriber questions, this batch in writing, dealing with his thoughts ahead of spring practices, the outlook for a long list of emerging contributors, including QBs, his outlook for a great A&M women's hoops squad and much more.
Recruiting Rankings Rewind: Assessing true value on a two-year delay
Recruiting rankings are always perceived to be important to a program's immediate success. However, Olin Buchanan explains why you shouldn't stress about recruiting rankings until players have had time to develop and truly make an impression on their teams.
All Updates
6/1/2021
John Harris offers way too early predictions on A&M's draft eligible players
9/15/2020
Cole Cubelic analyzes opt out decisions around the Southeastern Conference
9/9/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Competition at wideout, young guys to watch & more
9/1/2020
John Harris: It's time for Texas A&M to make a statement against LSU
8/4/2020
30 Players in 30 Days #14 — Elijah Blades
8/2/2020
The Afterparty, Part 2: Aggies in pro sports, most improved position in Jimbo era
7/15/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M cornerbacks
6/25/2020
McGee looks at seniors poised for a breakout season in 2020
6/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Previewing A&M's pass rush, Coley's recruiting impact & more
6/17/2020
Jordan Pugh analyzes the 2020 Texas A&M defensive backs
4/30/2020
Liucci: Aggies continue to stack talent on defensive side of the ball
4/16/2020
Pseudo Spring Superlatives: Cornerbacks & Safeties
3/17/2020
Aggie Football #1-99: Breaking down the jerseys numbers 1-5
7/23/2019
30 Players in 30 Days: #24 — Elijah Blades
4/8/2019
By Position: Analyzing A&M's Secondary
3/23/2019
Aggie secondary showing signs of improvement during spring practices
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.