Wide Receiver
6′4″
/
171 lbs
Carthage, TX
Senior (RS)
28:37
Ask Liucci: Prepping for Pittman's Pigs in Arlington once again & more
A pair of 3-1 teams meet in Arlington on Saturday afternoon as No. 24 Texas A&M and Arkansas will battle in the Southwest Classic at AT&T Stadium. Before heading to the DFW Metroplex, Billy Liucci answers another round of subscriber questions surrounding the Ags.
Pro Day LIVE: The latest from Texas A&M's 2017 NFL showcase
With the 2016 season in the rear view, 15 of Texas A&M's NFL-aspiring juniors and seniors are set to show off their talents for NFL scouts at the university's Pro Day. Follow along with all of the latest updates in our running thread.
Texas A&M 31, UCLA 24: Offense in Review
A bit sluggish early, the Aggie offense found its groove in the second half behind a new QB and a resurgent running game. A young interior line exceeded expectations, offering a hopeful answer to the biggest question facing the A&M offense.
On Finishing: Receiver depth, return options & Kaser's goal
Talent litters the Aggie roster, so much so that viable options to get the ball are having to work from behind the curve. On Thursday, Kevin Sumlin explained how they can do it. Meanwhile, Jeff Banks' special teams have a singular vision in mind.
10 yr ago by
Billy Liucci
Texas A&M vs. #3 Auburn: Key matchups
One of the nation's most explosive teams awaits A&M in Auburn. The Aggie offense and Tiger defense don't look quite like they did in the two teams' 45-41 thriller last year, but the important battles haven't changed.
All Updates
9/25/2024
Ask Liucci: Prepping for Pittman's Pigs in Arlington once again & more
5/13/2013
30 Players in 30 Days: #25 Edward Pope
4/1/2013
News & notes from Day 9 of spring practice
3/19/2013
Spring Practice Highlights: Offense-defense, receivers & more
7/10/2012
Listing the top five newcomers not named Trey Williams
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.