Right-Handed Pitcher
6′0″
/
180 lbs
Flower Mound, TX
Senior
89:36
TexAgs Reunion Hangout: 2016 Texas A&M SEC Champion Baseball team
On this day in 2016, the Aggie baseball team won the SEC Tournament in Hoover, Alabama. We got the team back together on Google Hangouts to reminisce about their favorite memories, stories, and much more.
2:56
Andrew Vinson talks SEC title, postseason pitching & hosting a regional
The man on the mound for the clinching outs of Texas A&M's SEC Tournament championship, senior right-hander Andrew Vinson has morphed during the season into one of the team's most vital players. Prior to College Station Regional action, Vinson shared his thoughts.
13:08
Diamond Thoughts: A national seed, a path laid out for Texas A&M
It's true, the No. 4 national seed seemed to be a bit of a slight for a team that defeated four top-10 opponents en route to an SEC Tournament title. Yet, a closer look at Texas A&M's draw should enthrall Aggies everywhere. All that's left to do is go win it.
1, 2, 3 Baseball Thoughts: Texas A&M 12, Florida 5
Nick Banks is back and Texas A&M is the SEC Tournament champion. The question this time around won't be whether the Aggies will get a national seed, but whether they'll be the top overall seed. In the meantime...
1, 2, 3 Baseball Thoughts: Texas A&M 11, Ole Miss 5
Following a pattern that has carried it to an unforgettable season, No. 2 Texas A&M waxed Ole Miss on Friday to set up an all-important series finale. Just like that, a share of the SEC championship — or an outright claim — is one win away.
All Updates
5/29/2020
TexAgs Reunion Hangout: 2016 Texas A&M SEC Champion Baseball team
6/2/2016
Andrew Vinson talks SEC title, postseason pitching & hosting a regional
5/30/2016
Diamond Thoughts: A national seed, a path laid out for Texas A&M
5/16/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Aggies hit final week with ultimate goal in sight
4/25/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Talent, depth paving Aggies' stretch run road
4/4/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Takeaways from A&M's painful trip to Gainesville
3/14/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Red-hot Aggies, rivalry reignited & the road ahead
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.