Infielder
5′10″
/
185 lbs
Katy, TX
Junior
89:36
TexAgs Reunion Hangout: 2016 Texas A&M SEC Champion Baseball team
On this day in 2016, the Aggie baseball team won the SEC Tournament in Hoover, Alabama. We got the team back together on Google Hangouts to reminisce about their favorite memories, stories, and much more.
11:41
Diamond Thoughts: Aggies hit final week with ultimate goal in sight
Once again deftly handling the grind of the elite SEC slate, No. 2 Texas A&M hit the road and took a series from No. 9 USC to position itself as a near-lock for a national seed. However, the four games remaining will determine the outcome of the Aggies' season.
1, 2, 3 Baseball Thoughts: Texas A&M 5, South Carolina 2
Once again, Texas A&M has taken a series from a top-10 SEC opponent. In Saturday's 5-2 victory against South Carolina in Columbia, the Aggies did it by — once again — following what's become a consistent and truly intimidating formula.
1, 2, 3 Baseball Thoughts: Texas A&M 3, South Carolina 0
In a series opener worthy of a top-10 SEC clash, No. 2 Texas A&M and No. 9 South Carolina went into the seventh inning knotted at 0-0. Unlikely heroes at the plate and another elite effort on the mound made the difference for the Aggies, who took Friday's game 3-0.
10:47
Diamond Thoughts: Nine games, four teams, two national seeds
It seems a foregone conclusion at this point that the SEC will land three top-eight national seeds — and, perhaps, a fourth. Three series remain for No. 2 Texas A&M, which can all but lock it up beginning this weekend. Are the Aggies peaking at the right time?
All Updates
5/29/2020
TexAgs Reunion Hangout: 2016 Texas A&M SEC Champion Baseball team
5/16/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Aggies hit final week with ultimate goal in sight
5/2/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Nine games, four teams, two national seeds
4/25/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Talent, depth paving Aggies' stretch run road
4/4/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Takeaways from A&M's painful trip to Gainesville
3/28/2016
Diamond Thoughts: The true test arrives for top-ranked Texas A&M
3/14/2016
Diamond Thoughts: Red-hot Aggies, rivalry reignited & the road ahead
2/29/2016
Diamond Thoughts: At 7-1, Aggies a story of balance and depth
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.