Status:
Signed
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Arkansas
None
Baylor
None
Houston
None
Iowa State
None
Michigan
None
Michigan State
None
Missouri
None
Nebraska
None
Oklahoma
None
Oklahoma State
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Penn State
None
Rice
None
SMU
None
TCU
None
Tulsa
None
+ 13 More
Videos
(15 Total)
2/23/2022
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
12/15/2021
Early Signing Day didn't disappoint: A&M on track for best class in history
2/10/2020
Offensive Grades: Texas A&M's 2019 & 2020 signing classes by position
2/6/2019
Signing Day Superlatives: Breaking down Texas A&M's 2019 class
1/4/2019
2019 A&M signees answer questions from TexAgs subscribers
1/3/2019
Under Armour All American Practice: Texas A&M signees in action
12/18/2018
Commit Profile & Highlights: 2019 Klein Collins RB Isaiah Spiller
12/1/2018
Isaiah Spiller's Season Highlights
11/19/2018
Texas A&M RB commit Isaiah Spiller likes what he sees in the Aggie offense
9/28/2018
A&M commit Isaiah Spiller recaps big night, looks ahead to future in Aggieland
8/6/2018
2019 West Mesquite WR Dylan Wright makes pledge to Texas A&M
8/3/2018
Jason Glenn analyzes A&M commits, Fisher's relationship with the THSCA
1/1/2018
Junior SZN
11/10/2017
2019 Klein Collins RB Isaiah Spiller talks recruiting process, Texas A&M ties
6/22/2017
Aggie legacy, 2019 RB Isaiah Spiller on Father's Day trip to Aggieland
Updates
18:54
11 mo ago by
Ryan Brauninger
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
21:30
1 yr ago by
Olin Buchanan
Early Signing Day didn't disappoint: A&M on track for best class in history
Photos
(21 Total)
Career Stats
| Season | TD | Rush | Yds | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2018
SR
|
4 | 37 | 225 | - | - | - |
|
2017
JR
|
23 | 198 | 1,284 | 15 | 313 | 4 |
Honors
Shuttle
4.21
Vertical
32.6
Power Ball
35.0
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×