Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL
ATH

Marcel Brooks

Athlete
6′3″ / 200 lbs
Flower Mound, TX
Marcus
Class of 2019
Rating: 98
?

National Avg
Rating: 94.9
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Recruited by
LSU
Committed
4/29/2018
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Arizona
None
Baylor
None
Clemson
None
 
Colorado
None
Florida
None
Florida State
None
Houston
None
Illinois
None
Kansas
None
Ohio State
None
Oklahoma
None
Oklahoma State
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Penn State
None
SMU
None
TCU
None
Texas
None
Utah
None
+ 17 More

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Ryan Brauninger
on Jul 30, 2018
Jason Howell
on Mar 4, 2018

Videos

(3 Total)
2019 Linebacker Marcel Brooks talks favorite schools, summer plans
2019 Flower Mound Marcus LB Marcel Brooks reacts to Texas A&M offer
Class of 2019 Athl player ,

Updates

(9 Total)
1 mo ago by Jason Howell
Recruiting Rankings Update: Shake ups in the top 100
There have been plenty of shake ups in the recruit rankings since the last update, and Jason Howell has the latest ranking updates from recruits all across the state in both the 2019 and 2020 high school classes.
4 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Those last remaining spots...
4 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Another one of those visitors...
5 mo ago by Jason Howell
Previewing the 2018 Opening Finals in Frisco by the numbers
Top prospects from around the country will be at The Opening Finals in Frisco this weekend, including a few A&M commits and targets. Jason Howell breaks down the event by the numbers.
5 mo ago by Billy Liucci
Liucci 44: Ranking the state's top high school prospects
Texas is a bastion of football talent, and the country's elite college programs are scouring the state for playmakers. With the summer camp circuit complete, Billy Liucci unveils his new rankings for state's best high school prospects.
All Updates

Photos

(7 Total)

Career Stats

Season
2019
SR
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.