Status:
Signed
HIGH SCHOOL
QB

Roschon Johnson

Quarterback
6′1″ / 190 lbs
Port Neches, TX
Port Neches-Groves
Class of 2019
Rating: 92
?

National Avg
Rating: 90.9
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Recruited by
Texas
Signed
Texas A&M
None
Jim Turner
Arkansas
None
Baylor
None
Florida
None
Florida State
None
Houston
None
North Carolina
None
Ohio State
None
Oklahoma
None
Ole Miss
None
Oregon
None
Penn State
None
SMU
None
Tennessee
None
ULM
None
+ 11 More

Staff Predictions

?
Confidence
Prediction
Name & Date
Jason Howell
on May 30, 2017

Videos

(4 Total)
Roschon Johnson 2017-18 Season
2019 PNG QB Roschon Johnson keeping his options open early on
2019 PN-G QB Roschon Johnson picking up offers, leading workouts
2019 PN-G QB Roschon Johnson recaps win, run-in with Myles Garrett

Updates

3 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
TexAgs High School Game of the Week: Nederland at Port Neches-Groves
One of the longest, most storied rivalries in the state of Texas, the 2018 version of Mid-County Madness comes with a district championship on the line. Ryan Brauninger breaks down the matchup between the Bulldogs and Indians on Friday night.
5 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Monday night recruiting notes - Post Clemson
6 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Recruiting notes from the road
7 mo ago by Billy Liucci
Liucci 44: Ranking the state's top high school prospects
Texas is a bastion of football talent, and the country's elite college programs are scouring the state for playmakers. With the summer camp circuit complete, Billy Liucci unveils his new rankings for state's best high school prospects.
10 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Weekend recruiting recap
All Updates

Photos

(3 Total)

Career Stats

Season Int TD Yds Cmp Yds TD
2017
JR
5 35 2,918 65 1,627 29
2016
SO
6 26 2,318 62 1,650 30
2019
SR
- - - - - -

Honors

40-yard dash

4.81

Shuttle

4.29

Vertical

33.6

Power Ball

38.0

SPARQ

83.79
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.