Status:
Signed
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Texas A&M
Signed
Alabama
None
Arkansas
None
Baylor
None
Colorado
None
Georgia
None
Minnesota
None
Missouri
None
Ohio State
None
Ole Miss
None
TCU
None
Tennessee
None
Texas
None
+ 8 More
Videos
(11 Total)
2/10/2020
Offensive Grades: Texas A&M's 2019 & 2020 signing classes by position
4/9/2019
Aggie signee Demani Richardson discusses knee injury, future with A&M
2/6/2019
Signing Day Superlatives: Breaking down Texas A&M's 2019 class
12/19/2018
Texas A&M signee S Demani Richardson excited for collegiate career
12/17/2018
Commit Profile & Highlights: 2019 Waxahachie S Demani Richardson
10/31/2018
My Senior Year!
7/4/2018
2019 Fort Bend Bush cornerback Erick Young commits to Texas A&M
7/3/2018
2019 Houston Madison CB Bobby Wolfe commits to Texas A&M
7/2/2018
Sights & Sounds: The Opening Finals, Day 2
4/9/2018
Waxahachie safety Demani Richardson locked in to Texas A&M
12/23/2017
Junior Year
Photos
(36 Total)
Career Stats
| Season | Rush | Yds | TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TDs | T | TFL | Int | Pass Breakups | Sacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2018
SR
|
17 | 199 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
2017
JR
|
44 | 519 | 7 | 13 | 293 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 3 | - |
|
2016
SO
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 47 | 4 | 2 | - | 1.0 |
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×