Elliott Harris

Defensive Tackle

6′3″ / 300 lbs

Little Rock, AR

Pulaski Robinson

Class of 2019

Rating: n/a

National Avg

Rating: n/a

School Preferences

Texas State

Medium

Updates

7 yr ago by Jason Howell

SUNDAY 7:47 Update: A&M to host a group of out of state visitors next week

SUNDAY 7:47 Update: the Pulaski Robinson crew had to turn back and head to Little Rock after Nathan Page suffered a concussion today at the Louisiana Tech camp today. They are looking to reschedule for July 23-24.********A group from Little Rock (AR) Pulaski Robinson will make the trip to College Station on Monday. The group has already visited Iowa State and Arkansas, and will visit Louisiana Tech before heading to Texas A&M. In the 2017 class DE David Porter is the guy who has caught coach Price's attention. He currently holds offers from Kansas State, Iowa State, La Tech, Memphis, and ULM. He's been talking to coach Price quite a bit lately. He's kind of a rush end/OLB guy. He measured 6-3, 225 at a camps this past week.David Porter Highlights2018 ATH Nathan Page is one of the top prospects in Arkansas' 2018 class. At 6-0, 180 pounds he is drawing attention at WR, S, and CB. Arkansas is showing a lot of interest as well as many others around the SEC. The speed is a bit of a question mark but he makes plays on the fieldNathan Page Highlights2018 TE Hunter Swoboda has put on 35 pounds of muscle this offseason, and he is 212 now and measures in at 6-4. He's been tearing up the camp circuit. Iowa State and Georgia have been showing a lot of interest in addition to Arkansas.Huter Swoboda Highlights2019 lineman Elliott Harris ran a 5.4 laser as a 300-pound freshman at the Opening Regional this spring. He doesn't have a lot of tape, but at 6-3 he's big and he is attracting attention on OL and DL.Elliott Harris Highlights

Photos

(1 Total)

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”

Follow TexAgs